Sure but, this needs to be said...those buying COD clearly are buying cause something is being delivered that they are ok to spend money on.
We've seen series come and go, people are not just solely buying something only based on name alone or something, that is harder to maintain then I think some really realize, look at all the IP we've seen die, teams close down etc.
For this game, it seems maybe their marketing was off cause I forgot about this game legit right after it was announced.
To Edge's point too, it doesn't help if the game isn't fun....
If a game is legit and people think its fun, sometimes even with little marketing, that word of mouth can help do the heavy lifting.
Doesn't help that the names are basically forgettable.
Look
@SpearHea.:D enough comments have given some solid reasons on why this didn't do good.
I don't see it as unfair, these are just reasons.
So I'm not going to sit here and pretend COD is just some easy thing that folks should support, something clearly is being done to have folks buy every year that is effective.
Its fun, it has a name folks can remember lol
Maybe this studio can learn at least from those ideas. Everything doesn't always need to be "new" focus on being fun first and have a solid marketable name AND then we can talk about new ideas, being new doesn't mean something will be fun and I think folks get a bit too carried way with that notion as if being different automatically must mean folks will care