TheTurtleTitan
Member
My God.
I've been gone from GAF all day, and I missed the center of the heat, damn.
I've been gone from GAF all day, and I missed the center of the heat, damn.
DCharlie said:Back to my question, are people actually making their own opinion of the reviews based on reading the text or are they simply going on what people say about the reviews who can read it?
I'm just curious.
Master Z said::lol @ people taking this score to heart. Is it really that hard to believe that some reviewers in Japan, a place where digital pets are all the rage, gave a highly interactive puppy training simulator a perfect score? Makes sense to me. Or is it because now all the DS heads have something to brag about? :lol Don't worry haters you'll have your day when this shit reaches the U.S. and the 7.5/10 reality sets in......unless.......naaaawww. (Quite entertaining thread though :lol )
Fight for Freeform said:I always though Nintendogs was a good idea, and I can see how it can get a perfect score.
But remember, Wind Waker also got a perfect score. Kinda throws out the validity and granduer of having a perfect score.
I definately see this as a title that puts the DS to good use and hopefully this score encourages other developers to do similar titles on the DS (similar in capabilities, rather than a blatant rip-off with different characters or whatever).
demi said:I ooo and aww at tons of other games then shelve them away, though. It happens eventually.
So how deep is Nintendogs? What is its lifecycle? I'm just curious, because I've been playing this for over a week and I still have no idea. Perhaps someone without the game can give me a good idea.Belfast said:If this is really a 40 game, then just about every other pet sim, with a hell of a lot more depth (or, in the case of, say, Tamagotchi's, at least a life cycle), must be completely off the scale.
Apparently you missed my post where I pointed out several things that do make it a game. I can't say I'm surprised because this thread is now big beyond words, but if you check the first few pages, you should find the post where I talk about JackFrost's disinformation. Please have the decency to read it, because honestly, JackFrost was not aware of the depth of the game. The rest of your post was based on misinformation, so I won't follow it up. There are plenty of secrets and surprises in the game, though.And if you want to debate whether Nintendogs is a game or not, you've got to at least acknowledge that, even if it were classified as a game, its level of gameplay is on the lower end of that scale.
Belfast said:Yeah, but with these types of games, it, more often than not, wears out a lot faster. Yeah, it happens with any game eventually, but if you spend 20-40 hours on Nintendogs, let me know.
demi said:Will do.
Hehe look at him run
People are having fun with it. Plain, simple, childish fun. Nintendogs might not have Soul Calibur's depth of play, Vagrant's Story's customization or Ocarina of Time's immersion but it seems to set a new standard for fun. And why shouldn't that be awarded with a perfect score?
Warning. Being a Sega game automatically qualifies a game for a -4 points bonus in Famitsu. Me and DC have moaned about this enough times in the past. There's a couple of reviewers in particular who detest Sega.Fight for Freeform said:Well, that means Crazy Taxi should have gotten an 11/10.
JackFrost2012 said:Jesus Christ, what is wrong with the illiterate fucktards at that magazine.
Nintendogs is pretty good, sure, but giving it a 40/40 is worse than wrong, it's obscene.
What the fuck. I'm flabbergasted.
I don't get it. I don't get it. I don't get it.
I'm aghast.
EDIT: The ... what ... I ... *sigh* I know Famitsu that likes the DS and touching. They also like the talking (they gave some 10s to Operator's Side and Dekavoice, remember). But this? A 40/40? That's not a good score, that's downright epochal, and they had to have known that and thought about that and they did it anyways. I got Nintendogs, I like Nintendogs, I've played Nintendogs but I'm telling you right now, it's an 8-9 range game to people who like it. It is NOT A 10, let alone four of them, that's just a fact. I like the game, but there's no way you can spin it as a 40/40. You pet your dog, you teach him tricks, you bathe him, walk him, feed him, throw a frisbee. It's a 3D tamagotchi with adorable animations and rudimentary microphone support. Cute goes a long way, sure, but not this far.
I am utterly beyond words at this point. What the fuck. Fuck. What the hell. What is wrong with them. What is wrong with Famitsu and Nintendo and the DS and the Japanese game industry that it has come to this. Jesus fucking Christ. I don't understand. I don't get it. This isn't just a score I don't agree with ... this isn't just, "haha Famitsu doesn't actually play the games they review." This is a serious mistake in the fabric of reality. This is something inside of me dying.
I'm hurt.
Inumaru said:10/10/10/10:
Although I maintain you're an arse, that quote is fucking funny. :lolDrinky Crow said:...congealed amid the dance of endorphins in the swollen skulls of the Nintendowns crowd...
Hey, you can't just waltz back in here like nothing happened these past 24 hours! You've been thoroughly PWNED. It's time to PWN up!Folder said:Although I maintain you're an arse, that quote is fucking funny. :lol
Good work.
Good man.john tv said:BTW, speaking of PWNED... you don't want to know what game is in the shopping bag I just came home with.................... (starts weeping)
Coen said:
This is exactly why I can see a perfect score happening.
People are having fun with it. Plain, simple, childish fun. Nintendogs might not have Soul Calibur's depth of play, Vagrant's Story's customization or Ocarina of Time's immersion but it seems to set a new standard for fun. And why shouldn't that be awarded with a perfect score?
Belfast said:Don't you think a definitive score should come as a result of the sum and not the parts? In a way, yes, Nintendogs can be fun. I mean, ANYTHING can be fun if you just use your imagination! Considering this is a skill Nintendo fans would be completely lost without, its no surprise they can use it to spin this news into ABSOLUTE PWNAGE OF THE NTH DEGREE.
Hey, maybe Famitsu should learn from Gamepro and include a score for "Fun" in their tally. I could see that being high. But the controls, gameplay, audio, visuals, et al of Nintendogs? Are all of those aspects so above and beyond everything else that it gets a 40?
Famitsu broke their own scale. I used to think they were respectable, but, hey, their opinion is just as good as anyone else's right? Game reviewing for the bourgeoius!
Shoryuken said:What would you personally rate Nintendogs? Providing you at least gave it some playtime. But you haven't, so don't answer this question, boy.
LOL! As if. There was a two week discrepancy between magazine release dates, on the cover of a weekly mag at that. I was just doing my best to get to the bottom of the original scan.john tv said:Hey, you can't just waltz back in here like nothing happened these past 24 hours! You've been thoroughly PWNED. It's time to PWN up!
BTW, speaking of PWNED... you don't want to know what game is in the shopping bag I just came home with.................... (starts weeping)
Belfast said:Don't you think a definitive score should come as a result of the sum and not the parts? In a way, yes, Nintendogs can be fun. I mean, ANYTHING can be fun if you just use your imagination! Considering this is a skill Nintendo fans would be completely lost without, its no surprise they can use it to spin this news into ABSOLUTE PWNAGE OF THE NTH DEGREE.
Hey, maybe Famitsu should learn from Gamepro and include a score for "Fun" in their tally. I could see that being high. But the controls, gameplay, audio, visuals, et al of Nintendogs? Are all of those aspects so above and beyond everything else that it gets a 40?
Famitsu broke their own scale. I used to think they were respectable, but, hey, their opinion is just as good as anyone else's right? Game reviewing for the bourgeoius!
AniHawk said:Hey, that's neat. You know what I'm going to do if/when Zelda gets a lower score than Nintendogs? Not obsess like a MADMAN over a single fucking magazine score.
Belfast said:Hey, maybe Famitsu should learn from Gamepro and include a score for "Fun" in their tally. I could see that being high. But the controls, gameplay, audio, visuals, et al of Nintendogs? Are all of those aspects so above and beyond everything else that it gets a 40?
Thread low-point.junkster said:LOL you fucktards.... 40/40 does not exist, stop acting like its a score. It's 4 10's. Put the pitchforks down and hug each other.
There's a huge difference, use your damn noggins.
Jonnyram said:Warning. Being a Sega game automatically qualifies a game for a -4 points bonus in Famitsu.
Folder said:Thread low-point.
Inumaru said:10/10/10/10:
Catchpenny said:I didn't think GAF could top the 7.9/C- debacles, but once again y'all have surprised me.
That's a bunch of junk. There are fewer 10/10/10 EGM games than 10/10/10/10 Famitsu games.Porridge said:EGM gives out 10s like they were pamphlets, yet people are posting their scores every month
Really? That surprises me. What's gotten perfect scores in EGM?fennec fox said:That's a bunch of junk. There are fewer 10/10/10 EGM games than 10/10/10/10 Famitsu games.
http://zoocar.cool.ne.jp/data/cr.htm or roughly translated http://nifty.amikai.com/amiweb/brow...tm&langpair=2,1&toolbar=no&lang=JA&c_id=niftyDoc Holliday said:Didnt Street FIghter 2 for the snes get a 4 tens or maybe star wars for the snes. Is there a place online to look them up?
engrish said:Dragon Quest VIII It carries out by being cursed with empty, the sea, and the ground, and he is the princess
Drinky Crow said:I'd move this back to off-topic where it BELONGS, but Mister Ricciardi's bein' a ponce about it.
From what I can remember (though this may not be a complete list), the other Platinums included:john tv said:I was a part of two of them -- the original Metal Gear Solid and Zelda: Ocarina of Time... but I can't recall what else came after that. AFAIK, those were the first two, though.
scola said:did this specific thread get moved to OT once though? I am curious because it was part of my ten pages, five bans, and one OT move expectations that I set out on the first page.