www.eurogamer.net
It’s Sony’s fault that this dev did a poor job?
winjer
could have found an explanation for.
I spent 800€ on a console where half of the enhanced games I want to play are broken. I certainly expect more from the devs AND Sony.It’s Sony’s fault that this dev did a poor job?
Damn, so Callisto Protocol, FFVII: Rebirth, the Resident Evils, Fortnite, F1, and many others being so good is a means for me to go Falcon Punch Sony into Oblivion!
Damn you, Kevin Butler!
Xtib81
Yes, 4 posts above yours.
It’s Sony’s fault that this dev did a poor job?
Damn, so Callisto Protocol, FFVII: Rebirth, the Resident Evils, Fortnite, F1, and many others being so good is a means for me to go Falcon Punch Sony into Oblivion!
Damn you, Kevin Butler!
Although I rarely talk about the S, does the Pro hold back other consoles because it is the lowest common denominator? That’s where a lot of the complaints come from.
Because there are so many examples of the Pro being used to produce vastly improved results, I’d say the hardware is less the issue and more management. That is, Sony could help more (again, assuming they haven’t) and teams could find other ways to leverage the hardware. In that regard, yes, both can shoulder some blame. Of course PSSR has improving to do, all new tech goes through that and Sony does need to get that ball rollin’ pronto!
The hotter the fire under Sony's ass, the faster PSSR actual shortcomings will be addressed, meaning Pro users ultimately being the ones benefiting the most from this kind of negative coverage.. which is mostly done with pure platform warring purposes.It’s Sony’s fault that this dev did a poor job?
Damn, so Callisto Protocol, FFVII: Rebirth, the Resident Evils, Fortnite, F1, and many others being so good is a means for me to go Falcon Punch Sony into Oblivion!
Damn you, Kevin Butler!
The hotter the fire under Sony's ass, the faster PSSR actual shortcomings will be addressed, meaning Pro users ultimately being the ones benefitting the most from this kind of negative coverage which is mostly done with pure platform warring purposes.
At the current state, developers forcing games looking like this with no possible other choice should be borderline illegal if it the end results ends up worse than base PS5. I mean, Avatar has clear improvements over base PS5:
But at the same time, thanks the usual and common issue seen in games sharing technical characteristic, it's also sort of broken.
If we had flawless PSSR implementation in Sony's own games like TLOU and Ragnarok being optional toggles, third party hacks forcing it on people when results in broken games as only choice, especially when it's not a Sony mandate or requirement, is nothing short of ridiculous.
As usual, we agree, especially about PSSR and devs who release games in this state.The hotter the fire under Sony's ass, the faster PSSR actual shortcomings will be addressed, meaning Pro users ultimately being the ones benefitting the most from this kind of negative coverage which is mostly done with pure platform warring purposes.
At the current state, developers forcing games looking like this with no possible other choice should be borderline illegal if it the end results ends up worse than base PS5. I mean, Avatar has clear improvements over base PS5:
But at the same time, thanks the usual and common issue seen in games sharing technical characteristic, it's also sort of broken.
If we had flawless PSSR implementation in Sony's own games like TLOU and Ragnarok being optional toggles, third party hacks forcing it on people when results in broken games as only choice, especially when it's not a Sony mandate or requirement, is nothing short of ridiculous.
RoboFu
To try to increase the sales of games nobody give a shit anymore while also putting in the minimum effort.
Would be insane if they weren't, given they're zoomed in minuscule portions of frames took from a compressed YouTube video.That looks blurry as shit both ways.
That’s not true, PSSR isn’t able to do what you just mentioned.
Vick
SH2 still has its issues though, so I hope they improve further.
Except it's not, as proven by games like Stellar Blade that have great IQ.
Yet it has more improved games on it than shit stains like Avatar.
The thing is that a static image says nothing, FSR2 also looks great in a screenshot, but when it moves everything goes to shit. But hey, even if while playing you have an image full of noise and shimmering, you can make great screenshots where zooming in and out you can distinguish that it looks sharper than a PS5 screenshot, all for $699, enjoy!As usual, we agree, especially about PSSR and devs who release games in this state.
Zoomed in obviously, but much less blurry on the Pro.
You either don’t have a Pro or were sippin’ on some J-Daniels when posting this.The thing is that a static image says nothing, FSR2 also looks great in a screenshot, but when it moves everything goes to shit. But hey, even if while playing you have an image full of noise and shimmering, you can make great screenshots where zooming in and out you can distinguish that it looks sharper than a PS5 screenshot, all for $699, enjoy!
What they did with Alan Wake 2 was dumb. They claimed they tried just upping the resolution and that they decided enhancing the visuals was the better alternative.
Because perhaps that option would give performance results vs PS5 that would not help give reasons to make the jump to a €800 hardware that plays the same games.
I have seen DLSS upscale from below 1080p to 4k. Infact it was Alan Wake 2 and it looked like it could have been around 1440p if I didn't know. That's what makes DLSS so good. You will see this with the Switch 2 with games running internally running at 900p looking good. We will see after the Switch 2 launches how pointless it is if an AI upscaler can't upscale from a lower resolution.
Please tell me you're being sarcastic.
Except that it is if either a. Your game worked well beforehand and/or b. You really know what you’re doing.
