No, this is wrong. You could easily build GPUs with DDR3 but we don't know how this would turn out in terms of graphics. We don't know the performance hit. And it will also tell us only remotely how this would translate into differences in consoles as the architecture is quite different because of the APU. Also we don't know what differences make ESRAM and the move-units. Don't expect wonders, sure, but they don't build it this way for nothing.
Compared to xbone? Nope
GTA 5 runs on a measly 512mb of ram, how is 5gb of gddr5 not good enough.
The fuck is wrong with people.
GTA 5 runs on a measly 512mb of ram, how is 5gb of gddr5 not good enough.
The fuck is wrong with people.
I think I saw someone in this thread trying to say that DF knew about the 8GB ram increase in PS4 but I believe that was EDGE and only EDGE that reported on a increase in ram right?
Apparently someone said Gies knew that DF knew it first. lol
I heard inside sources were his favorite sources after all. You should learn not to doubt Gies by now, kitty.Apparently someone said Gies knew that DF knew it first. lol
What? Of course you can put crappy RAM in anything if you want but the fact is all high end cards come with GDDR5 for obvious reasons. The ESRAM is puny amount and still slower than GDDR5. Sure it will help with performance but it's a band-aid solution.
GTA 5 runs on a measly 512mb of ram, how is 5gb of gddr5 not good enough.
The fuck is wrong with people.
^ is the symbol for bitwise xor. 2^30=28 Therefore, that program would use 224 bytes of memory, plus bookkeeping and other overhead.
You mean: auto p = new char[(1<<30)*8];
GTA 5 runs on a measly 512mb of ram, how is 5gb of gddr5 not good enough.
The fuck is wrong with people.
Negative Xbox One Rumor = 100% true = no source needed
Negative PS4 Rumor = never true = even with source the sites are "dumb"
Positive Xbox One Rumor = something is still wrong = more sources are needed, site posting are MS fanboys
Positive PS4 Rumor = 100% true. best thing EVA! = no source needed
Hmmmm.....seeing a pattern.
The guys at DF are journalists, or at least they try to be so I'm hoping they got at least two sources before posting the article. After all, it's their day job and I'd hope they're pretty damn good at it. They of course get things wrong, just as insiders get things wrong....
Because 5.5GB is tiny.The speed is not especially crucial, it's the amount of ram. Devs like more ram way more than fast but tiny ram. Like you want with everything that computes.
What? Of course you can put crappy RAM in anything if you want but the fact is all high end cards come with GDDR5 for obvious reasons. The ESRAM is puny amount and still slower than GDDR5. Sure it will help with performance but it's a band-aid solution.
No offense intended, but even professional journalists sometimes have a hidden agenda, and to be clear, I'm not saying there was one with DF or EG. Just think of the image Fox News has with politics, it's not always seen as straight fwd.
So DDR3 is crappy ram now? Man, this is getting ridiculous, really... I don't say DDR3 is as good as GDDR5 for games but the comparison itself is invalid as it does not translate 1:1 on consoles. Accept this or don't.
Because 5.5GB is tiny.
So DDR3 is crappy ram now? Man, this is getting ridiculous, really... I don't say DDR3 is as good as GDDR5 for games but the comparison itself is invalid as it does not translate 1:1 on consoles. Accept this or don't.
DDR3 is crappy and slow.
Why do you think Nintendo and MS rely on Embedded RAM? It's too speed things up.
People like to know that the new systems will have long legs to run for the next 10 or so years.
And we still have to see what it's good for.
GTA 5 runs on a measly 512mb of ram, how is 5gb of gddr5 not good enough.
The fuck is wrong with people.
Sure they do this to speed things up but calling RAM that computers nowadays in almost every system is off. And to add it's not only ESRAM, we still don't know what the move-engines do exactly. But either way, just comparing specs point by point doesn't tell you the whole story on how the "system" will all parts together will perform.
512 mb sure carried the PS3 pretty damn long.
Turning on Xbox via voice![]()
No, this is wrong. You could easily build GPUs with DDR3 but we don't know how this would turn out in terms of graphics. We don't know the performance hit. And it will also tell us only remotely how this would translate into differences in consoles as the architecture is quite different because of the APU. Also we don't know what differences make ESRAM and the move-units. Don't expect wonders, sure, but they don't build it this way for nothing.
The speed is not especially crucial, it's the amount of ram. Devs like more ram way more than fast but tiny ram. Like you want with everything that computes.
GTA 5 also looks and will run poorly.
GTA 5 also looks and will run poorly.
sub-hd and -30fps can carry anything long.
DDR3 does not have the bandwidth per a pin needed to get high bandwidth without having a very wide bus, GPUs need lots of bandwidth, the performance hit would be very large!
The SRAM only helps for things that can fit into it and the "move engines" are nothing really of note, they are just there to try to help the system move things between the SRAM and main RAM.
Well good thing for them is PS4 has both fast ram and a huge amount .
GTA 5 runs on a measly 512mb of ram, how is 5gb of gddr5 not good enough.
The fuck is wrong with people.
It's not just a band-aid solution. It's an upgrade on a similar embedded RAM solution the 360 has, that helped developers a lot in the past with post-processing.
Also, GDDR5 is much better than DDR3, but not as dramatic as some people are making it out to be.
In the first couple of years, we won't really notice much of a difference in multiplatform games in any case.
512 mb sure carried the PS3 pretty damn long.
Hey I just got an email from gamestop, they have PS4s for preorder today..
Have you guys been canceling your preorders?
That's the argument people used when they learned Wii U has 2 GBs of RAM.
It's expectations vs. reality that's the problem. But frankly I don't see what's so bad here anyway so *shrug*
As he said full editorial is under preparation, I hope he can post full composition on ram usage.
Because in Sony's SDK docs, even page swap can count as RAM now.
Do we want another gen where only super high budgets and limitations can create graphics like that? TF2 never got updates on the consoles because there wasn't enough RAM for the extra weapons and games like Planetside 2 are impossible. I can put an awesome looking FMV into a PS1 game, but I want a good looking game without all the limitations.I'm pretty sure its been confirmed by rockstar that GTA 5 will run a lot smoother than GTA 4.
What about RDR, not only is that game vast its also beautiful to boot, all while running on 512 mb of ram.
Wait. Are people doubting Bruce and thuway?
Is 720p sub HD to you?
God of War, Uncharted, TLoU look mighty damn fine on my tv.
Wait. Are people doubting Bruce and thuway?