• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

GeForce RTX 5090 is $1,999 5080 $999 5070 Ti $749 5070 $549 (Availability Starting Jan 30 for RTX 5090 and 5080)

Bojji

Member
You mean that chart?

50-vs-40-series-nvidia-benchmark-exact-numbers-v0-d5thkxvsolbe1.png


33% and 35% in apples to apples comparisons is a software patch?

One with RT and the second one with RT and frame gen. Zero raster tests so far.
 

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
One with RT and the second one with RT and frame gen. Zero raster tests so far.
It's still an apples to apples test, unless you think for some bizarre reason, regular frame gen on the RTX 50 works a lot better? Far Cry's RT is weak as hell and wouldn't explain that disparity. Either this chart is made up or it isn't.
 

//DEVIL//

Member
One with RT and the second one with RT and frame gen. Zero raster tests so far.
Right . But expecting the performance in resta to be lower than the one with RT. Simply because the newer RT core is working with the resta power just to gain this advantage over older RT cores.

If the newer RT cores and resta power can only do that much combined, then resta in theory should be lower . But who knows
 

Bojji

Member
It's still an apples to apples test, unless you think for some bizarre reason, regular frame gen on the RTX 50 works a lot better? Far Cry's RT is weak as hell and wouldn't explain that disparity. Either this chart is made up or it isn't.

DLSS3 frame gen has performance hit, you could have 60fps without FG but when FG is enabled it doubles from ~50FPS to 100FPS for example (so base FPS drops). I think there i a chance that this performance hit might be lower on Blackwell? Or not, we don't know but that would skew results for sure.

Right . But expecting the performance in resta to be lower than the one with RT. Simply because the newer RT core is working with the resta power just to gain this advantage over older RT cores.

If the newer RT cores and resta power can only do that much combined, then resta in theory should be lower . But who knows

RT teraflops performance went significantly up (like over 30% between 4070tiS and 5070ti) so it should boost hybrid RT games to some extend. Meanwhile raster TFs are closer.
 
Last edited:

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
DLSS3 frame gen has performance hit, you could have 60fps without FG but when FG is enabled it doubles from ~50FPS to 100FPS for example (so base FPS drops). I think there i a chance that this performance hit might be lower on Blackwell? Or not, we don't know but that would skew results for sure.
The hit would have to be comically higher to balloon up to a 35% advantage. Based on those apples to apples charts at least, the 5080 certainly is faster than the 4080. Not Turing to Ampere levels or even Ampere to Blackwell, but people have been suggesting the gains will be less than 5% and that seems impossible.

I think we’re looking at around a 20% performance advantage in general going from a 4080>5080, not 30-35%. Those games are likely strong performers on Blackwell.
 
Last edited:

Bojji

Member
The hit would have to be comically higher to balloon up to a 35% advantage. Based on those apples to apples charts at least, the 5080 certainly is faster than the 4080. Not Turing to Ampere levels or even Ampere to Blackwell, but people have been suggesting the gains will be less than 5% and that seems impossible.

I think we’re looking at around a 20% performance advantage in general going from a 4080>5080, not 30-35%. Those games are likely strong performers on Blackwell.

Combine it with RT teraflop increase.

We don't have even one pure raster bench from nvidia so no wonder people are not confident about performance jump. Most games still are raster only (plus software lumen UE5 games).
 

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
Combine it with RT teraflop increase.

We don't have even one pure raster bench from nvidia so no wonder people are not confident about performance jump. Most games still are raster only (plus software lumen UE5 games).
That would mean a titanic performance increase in ray tracing. FC6 has a 21% performance penalty when toggling RT on on a 4080. If the 5080 and 4080 are in the same ballpark with RT off, but the 5080 suddenly becomes 25% more performant with RT on, then we’re looking at the biggest gen-on-gen rt performance increase so far.

I doubt though if the numbers of BMW are anything to go by. The 5090 should be wiping the floor with the 4090 by well over 60%, not just 30-40%.
 
Last edited:

Bojji

Member
That would mean a titanic performance increase in ray tracing. FC6 has a 21% performance penalty when toggling RT on on a 4080. If the 5080 and 4080 are in the same ballpark with RT off, but the 5080 suddenly becomes 25% more performant with RT on, then we’re looking at the biggest gen-on-gen rt performance increase so far.

I doubt though if the numbers of BMW are anything to go by. The 5090 should be wiping the floor with the 4090 by well over 60%, not just 30-40%.

We know nothing without independent tests. Nvidia focuses on MFG and don't even show BW TF numbers (when they show them for Ada):

LbPoD9l.jpeg
ML1cYk7.jpeg
 

Bojji

Member
Yeah, so wait for reviews instead of claiming the 5080 won’t be an improvement over the 4080. It won’t be a big one, but they won’t be equal.

Yep, there is no way it won't be. Question is, how much? And where it will land in performance compared to 4090.
 
Last edited:

Zathalus

Member
It's still an apples to apples test, unless you think for some bizarre reason, regular frame gen on the RTX 50 works a lot better? Far Cry's RT is weak as hell and wouldn't explain that disparity. Either this chart is made up or it isn't.
That Plague tale note is odd. FP8 vs FP4. Might be that DLSS runs faster on 5000 series with the new Transformer model due to that. Unless I misunderstood what they meant by flux.

He's referring to the cu counts. Those have barely increased, so any kind of noteworthy uplift (if any) has to come from the architecture itself.
Not only that, memory bandwidth has taken a rather large jump upwards. Games that are heavily memory bound can see a larger than expected boost just due to that.
 
Last edited:

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
That huge and profitable high end gpu market that AMD and Intel can't survive in? Even if it's just that they make shit cards that can't compete, Nvidia and the AIB vendors sure do leave a lot of money on the table by producing so few of those cards.

Even if the cards only have $400-$500 of hardware in them, you can't just ignore the R&D and marketing costs, your thoughts on owners of those spending more on games and DLC is just pure conjecture.
Every gpu ever released had rnd. It was always a cost
I've been listening to Jeff for 20 years. I'm not going to say he's wrong, but the degree to which he's implying the additional latency impacts his ability to perform in game compared to his skill level relative to competitive fighting game and FPS players seems out of whack. He's always been a bit above average at both of those genres. Not to say he needs to "deal with it" or anything. I just think the latency introduced by FG is one of those things that some people are going to feel and others aren't. The people who don't feel it just aren't sensitive to it and probably aren't playing a lot of competitive multiplayer games.
yeah and he is obviously exaggerating
 

//DEVIL//

Member
DLSS3 frame gen has performance hit, you could have 60fps without FG but when FG is enabled it doubles from ~50FPS to 100FPS for example (so base FPS drops). I think there i a chance that this performance hit might be lower on Blackwell? Or not, we don't know but that would skew results for sure.



RT teraflops performance went significantly up (like over 30% between 4070tiS and 5070ti) so it should boost hybrid RT games to some extend. Meanwhile raster TFs are closer.
Exactly . That’s why we don’t have any information about resta performance. But I would assume if it was more than 30%, they would have at least one graph. But nope nothing.

5090 being on the node as 4090, I am really not expecting much of an improvement . But the 5000 series in general are a good future proof cards due to them having the AI hardware necessary for AI improvements in future.
 
We know nothing without independent tests. Nvidia focuses on MFG and don't even show BW TF numbers (when they show them for Ada):

LbPoD9l.jpeg
ML1cYk7.jpeg
It's possible to calculate flops based on the available data.

RTX5070 - 31TF / RTX4070 - 29TF
RTX5070ti - 44TF / RTX4070ti - 40TF
RTX5080 - 56TF / RTX4080 - 49TF
RTX5090 - 105TF / RTX4090 - 83TF
 
Last edited:

StereoVsn

Gold Member
When the actual hardware (based on CUDA/shader counts) has such limited improvement over the predecessor, yes

NVIDIA's own charts show the 5080 is a software patch over the 4080.

5090 is likely to be 25-30% faster, but also a 28.9% increase in total draw power.
I think it depends on the use case. For gaming,, seems about right. For AI workloads I can see much bigger improvements due to 32GB VRAM, 512bit bus and increase in Tensor cores.
 

Lethal01

Member
Clickbait or not, it's difficult to argue with the raw figures.

MnMy3Bp.png

KTYo6bD.png


Overall the 5000 series has been a sideways refresh with a software patch. The 5090 has an increase in performance - with increased power consumption and total price. Rest of the cards? Raster performance is no better than 2 year old GPU.

so in a raytracing heavy game the 5080 would double my performance? seems like a bargain does that test use framegen?
 
Last edited:

FireFly

Member
"The Blackwell SM doubles the INT32 bandwidth and throughput by giving all shader cores the ability to run either INT32 or FP32, unlike Ada, which supported that only on half the cores. They also made the Tensor Cores accessible from the shaders, by using the new DirectX Cooperative Vectors API."


So that explains the modest bump on per SM basis. No extra compute, but gaming performance should be slightly better.
 

Gubaldo

Member
there are reports that 5090 is also seeing 15-20% increase over 4090.
Which is hard to believe given the spec difference between these two.
May be scaling issues?


Edit: That source fixed it;s headline , now its stating 30% increase
 
Last edited:

analog_future

Resident Crybaby
Am I crazy in thinking these cards might not be THAT hard to get at launch?

  • No bitcoin mining craze to deal with
  • No COVID related supply chain issues to deal with
  • Cards are at really high prices and more and more people are struggling
  • General enthusiasm around the reveal has been lukewarm
  • Switch 2 announcement may steal some of the thunder


I'm sure the initial batch will still sell out, but I wonder if they'll sell out in an hour or two this time around instead of the first 3 minutes.
 
Last edited:

Kenpachii

Member
Am I crazy in thinking these cards might not be THAT hard to get at launch?

  • No bitcoin mining craze to deal with
  • No COVID related supply chain issues to deal with
  • Cards are at really high prices and more and more people are struggling
  • General enthusiasm around the reveal has been lukewarm
  • Switch 2 announcement may steal some of the thunder


I'm sure the initial batch will still sell out, but I wonder if they'll sell out in an hour or two this time around instead of the first 3 minutes.

Yea got the feeling those cards won't sell that fast. The founders edition will be sold out tho.
 

dave_d

Member
Am I crazy in thinking these cards might not be THAT hard to get at launch?

  • No bitcoin mining craze to deal with
  • No COVID related supply chain issues to deal with
  • Cards are at really high prices and more and more people are struggling
  • General enthusiasm around the reveal has been lukewarm
  • Switch 2 announcement may steal some of the thunder


I'm sure the initial batch will still sell out, but I wonder if they'll sell out in an hour or two this time around instead of the first 3 minutes.
Hard to know. I mean wasn't the deal in the 40 series was that you could get them as long as you weren't trying to get the 4090? (They were so plentiful that tech tubbers started claiming that the 4070 was a flop. Of course tech epiphany and Steam GPU survey suggest otherwise.)
 

Celcius

°Temp. member
Am I crazy in thinking these cards might not be THAT hard to get at launch?

  • No bitcoin mining craze to deal with
  • No COVID related supply chain issues to deal with
  • Cards are at really high prices and more and more people are struggling
  • General enthusiasm around the reveal has been lukewarm
  • Switch 2 announcement may steal some of the thunder


I'm sure the initial batch will still sell out, but I wonder if they'll sell out in an hour or two this time around instead of the first 3 minutes.
I guarantee you the RTX 5090 will fly off the shelves. The first and only 32gb GeForce card and the best performance money can buy.
You may be right about the rest though.
 
Top Bottom