1080p+, 60fps, Better textures, larger FOV, larger view distance, dramatically reduced load times, mods, Steam, /PCGAMING
Aww you even put the stickers on.
I am ready for PC gaming. Teach me your ways.
1080p+, 60fps, Better textures, larger FOV, larger view distance, dramatically reduced load times, mods, Steam, /PCGAMING
Aww you even put the stickers on.
Any chance your are in the Pac NW?I am ready for PC gaming. Teach me your ways.
You can't. You can change the fan profile to make the fans spin higher preventing it from getting to 70C though.How can I stop my 670 from downclocking when it reaches 70 degrees?
Also its not reaching the 1137 MHz speed shown on the box, stops at 1070 MHz
GPU: ASUS DCUII 670 TOP edition
I cant get my 670 to go above 58 =/How can I stop my 670 from downclocking when it reaches 70 degrees?
Also its not reaching the 1137 MHz speed shown on the box, stops at 1070 MHz
GPU: ASUS DCUII 670 TOP edition
I cant get my 670 to go above 58 =/
And I'm not even overclocking yet
Any chance your are in the Pac NW?
You can't. You can change the fan profile to make the fans spin higher preventing it from getting to 70C though.
Seems abnormally high. Ambient temps? Case situation?
I noticed in your screen shots in the PC hi-res thread...doesn't seem like your GPU is running at 98-99% utilization in your pics (going by the Afterburner overlay). It should be, especially in Armored Kill. Do you have V-sync on?
http://i.minus.com/iM96dIrb8bI2f.jpg[/IMG
You're still getting 60fps though![/QUOTE]
Yep, Also, I'm only running at 1600x900 yet (as I haven't gotten my 1080 monitor yet) if that makes a difference.
And wait... Vsync LOWERS gpu performance? O.O
Oh. Don't use Furmark. It's so synthetic that it's basically meaningless.I see.
I was just stress testing my GPU using Furmark (100% load) to see if it was one of the faulty DCUII TOP edition ones. Thankfully it didn't crash yet![]()
Yep, Also, I'm only running at 1600x900 yet (as I haven't gotten my 1080 monitor yet) if that makes a difference.
And wait... Vsync LOWERS gpu performance? O.O
Oh. Don't use Furmark. It's so synthetic that it's basically meaningless.
If you want to cycle for extended stress tests use Uniengine Heaven on loop. Otherwise, 3DMark11 is a good 'un to use.
Yep, Also, I'm only running at 1600x900 yet (as I haven't gotten my 1080 monitor yet) if that makes a difference.
And wait... Vsync LOWERS gpu performance? O.O
And it's GLORIOUS
My GPU is currently idle at 37. My old 4890 would Idle at 58! And it'd HOT in my apartment, too!
So good.
Vsync most definitely on. Dat input lag.
Ideally, if someone were to invest in a gtx 690, how long would it last if they constantly wanted high-ultra settings +30 fps?
2-3 years?
Just in case that was read in such a way, I deleted my answer to say Smokey's was better. I'm probably being over sensitive, just wanted to make sure you didn't think I meant it towards your awesome vsync essay.![]()
At 1080p? I'd say MINIMUM of 3-4 years i'd say. 690 is tons more powerful than the new GPUs that will be in the next gen consoles so you'll be set for years especially if you don't mind not gaming at 60fps.
you'll be set for a very long time.
I hadn't read it that way, but thanks for the consideration.
There's some fairly techy Haswell info from the Intel Developer forum here, if anyone's interested. It's mostly concerning energy efficiency and integrated graphics improvements, but there are a few tidbits about the improved FP performance of the AVX2 SIMD units and increased cache bandwidth, so some of you may be interested. Nothing about release timeframes, though.
60fps would be be 2-3 years max then I'm guessing?
A grand to only last that long is insanity to me.
Since I got my new rig going, I need the firefox add-ons (namely the GAF Addon that makes my posts (and my posts of mine that Gaffers quote) turn green.
Does anybody have that?
Thanks! That worked!It's a user script. I think you need the GreaseMonkey extension.
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/77218
I tried this before and tried it again after inputting my username and it still doesn't workIt's a user script. I think you need the GreaseMonkey extension.
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/77218
Maybe just copy and paste this into the script? Worked for me the first time =/I tried this before and tried it again after inputting my username and it still doesn't work![]()
/*
Copyright (c) 2010-2011 James Rodrigues
This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied
warranty. In no event will the authors be held liable for any damages
arising from the use of this software.
Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,
including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it
freely, subject to the following restrictions:
1. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not
claim that you wrote the original software. If you use this software
in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be
appreciated but is not required.
2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be
misrepresented as being the original software.
3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source
distribution.
*/
// ==UserScript==
// @name NeoGAF User Highlighter
// @namespace com.zombie.net
// @description Highlight user posts, quotes, and threads.
// @include http://www.neogaf.com/forum/*
// @include http://neogaf.com/forum*
//
// ==/UserScript==
// These two variables must be set!
//////////////////////////////////
var username = "Hazaro"; // <-- Your GAF username goes between the quotes.
var color = "#d6e9cc"; // <-- This is the highlight color.
// Options
//////////////////////////////////
var highlight_avatar_area = true;
var highlight_post_area = true;
var highlight_threads = true;
var highlight_quotes = true;
//////////////////////////////////
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
// Add jQuery
///////////////////////////////////////////////
var GM_JQ = document.createElement('script');
GM_JQ.src = 'http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.5.1/jquery.min.js';
GM_JQ.type = 'text/javascript';
document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(GM_JQ);
if (window.opera) unsafeWindow=window;
// Check if jQuery's loaded
function GM_wait()
{
if(typeof unsafeWindow.jQuery == 'undefined') { window.setTimeout(GM_wait,100); }
else { $ = unsafeWindow.jQuery; if(username.length > 0) execJQuery(); }
}
GM_wait();
// Execute
////////////////////////////////////////////////
function execJQuery()
{
// thanks to yeef @ neogaf
$.expr[":"].econtains = function(obj, index, meta, stack) {
return (obj.textContent || obj.innerText || $(obj).text() || "").toLowerCase() == meta[3].toLowerCase();
}
var path = window.location.pathname;
if((path.search("showpost") > 0) || (path.search("showthread") > 0))
{
var user = $(".bigusername:contains('" + username + "')");
if(highlight_avatar_area && highlight_post_area)
user.css('color', 'black').closest('tr').children().css('background-color', '' + color + '');
else
{
So all this talk of Haswell has me thinking Ivy Bridge may not be the optimal upgrade move, especially since it wasn't much of an update over Sandy and Intel got cheap with the thermal paste. So now I'm looking into a mini-upgrade to my E5200 + 4770 PC until next year just to tide me over. I've seen Q9300's going for around $100 on eBay and low-end video card options might open up after the 660 and 650 launch in a few days. Throw in a badly needed new case and I'm looking at around ~$300-350 (or less if I decide on not getting a case). What thinketh GAF?
That's a lot of bleed, 3 of the corners have it
tick releases are always meh. Haswell looks to be reasonably faster than Sandy/Ivy, but may not be the jump we saw from Nehalem to Sandy. Intel seems to be focused on low power consumption. It's not clear how much faster Haswell is at integer math, but the chips have more cache, 2 ALUs per core (could be interesting), and improved branching prediction. I'm guessing 15-40% faster than Ivy.
Broadwell will be after Haswell and probably will also be meh.
People looking for new mobile devices...yeah definitely wait for Haswell. Runs on 10 fucking watts at Ivy Bridge speed. 10-20 hour battery life hybrids. I'm getting one next year.
I'd say yes if Sandy/Ivy weren't already stupid powerful. The only time that these processors are a bottleneck are when engines aren't designed around using quad core or 8 threads. If anything, the new engines will only increase the lifespan.So all this talk of Haswell has me thinking Ivy Bridge may not be the optimal upgrade move, especially since it wasn't much of an update over Sandy and Intel got cheap with the thermal paste. So now I'm looking into a mini-upgrade to my E5200 + 4770 PC until next year just to tide me over. I've seen Q9300's going for around $100 on eBay and low-end video card options might open up after the 660 and 650 launch in a few days. Throw in a badly needed new case and I'm looking at around ~$300-350 (or less if I decide on not getting a case). What thinketh GAF?
Oh Lian Li, you are so adorable.For people after a discrete HTPC case I think I've found just what you're looking for.
http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=21438
And only $299 AU.
Read and write look pretty good to me.
660Ti is far better.So after doing exhaustive but fallible research (since I'm the one doing it) I narrowed it down to a EVGA GTX 570. Mind you I have a $300 budget and I wanted to stick with NVIDIA, and since I only have a Best Buy Card I have to go through that.
Any objections? I want to play BF3 and Witcher 2 on the best possible settings I can. I know Best Buy has slim pickins compared to newegg. So if you can please let me know your opinions, and thanks so much for giving me feedback
EVGA 570
Newegg Reviews