Winter John
Member
Not sure why you think strawmanning is doing your case any good here but keep on trucking
Nowadays, that’s all social censoring, sorry “deplatforming” is.Just hold on and think what we are discussing here.
A person, who did something certain folks dislike.
And that "something" is:
1) believing school shooting conspiracy (re-tweet)
2) claiming that transwomen have advantage over cis-women (I hope I'm not messing terminology up), since they at the very least have male bones (which are bigger/heavier/stronger)
This is not a sort of #censorship is it? They don't suppress her speech, merely want to erase her as a person.
So cherry picking the last 2 fights is?Not sure why you think strawmanning is doing your case any good here but keep on trucking
i'm in no way , shape or form an expert in the matter, but if we consider the fact that there are scientific studies inquiring how much of that natural advantage is retained after changing,i'm tempted to say that maybe the problem is not as clear cut as you depict it.This is grade A bullshit by the way. Being born a man and going through puberty cannot be undone by hormones. Bone density, frame size, men tend to have larger skulls, larger hands and feet, completely different torsos, the list goes on and on. A man who has drilled exercise into his muscles and body with testosterone completely retains this muscle memory and technique, no matter how much you attempt to transition them.
The same was as taking steroids or other PEDs is banned, because if you train on steroids or EPO to improve your cardio, your body retains the abilities after the banned substances are gone. It's pretty standard stuff and well known to MMA fighters, boxers etc. Vitor Belfort abused TRT for years and had a ridiculous body of a 21 year old at age 40, causing serious damage to other fighters along his win streak. Cris Cyborg, while clean now, roided up in Brazil and looks like a man still. She passes tests because shes clean, but remains a murderer.
Theyve even just banned a runner for having natural elevated levels of testosterone, and all she does is run on a track. A man who goes through puberty, spends 30 years with testosterone in his system, training, living, working, who then transitions, is not a woman. He's a man with an altered body, retaining a large amount of his advantages, and should not be beating up women. It's not even up for debate, apart from by deranged activists.
So cherry picking the last 2 fights is?
I was never, nor am I still a fan of Rhonda. I thought her fights were boring and always ended the same.
I won’t try to take away anything she’s done because her last couple opponents were better then her.
To try to take away her “acting” jobs because she got beat in the ring is fucking stupid.
Attack the arguement, not the person.
Weird, this showed up in my articles of interest.
Though I have no idea how. Bad google! Are they all launching a smear campaign at once or just parroting each other as per usual?
It's funny how Netherrealm decided to go to bat for these lunatics and make a game to pander to them and now once again, they've found something to throw a bitch fit about.
She was fed cans like Cat Zingano for most of her UFC career. Anyone can look at her record and see that. I'd put the blame on Dana for it because at the time he was trying to build up wmma, but he didn't do her any favors at all. When she finally had to face 2 real opponents she got her ass well and truly kicked. That's what happens when a career is built on fighting gym rats. The upside of it was it lead to her move to WWE, where she seems to be a lot happier and has done well for herself.
i'm in no way , shape or form an expert in the matter, but if we consider the fact that there are scientific studies inquiring how much of that natural advantage is retained after changing,i'm tempted to say that maybe the problem is not as clear cut as you depict it.
but i also don't really care that much myself since i'm not transgender and i'm not one of the guys in charge to decide,so whatever i think is ininfluent.
When they say MMA pioneer, it might just be the fact that she brought in more money than anyone else right? You're missing the point by a nautical mile here. It's not an assessment of quality or performance in the ring.
Rousey is a great Judoka and MMA fighter. I do not agree with her politics, but she is a great fit for a fighting game.
She's an awful actress though, which is all that matters for a voice actor.
Well they didn't say that did they. They said "MMA Pioneer." So it's more than reasonable to assume that in an article about a UFC fighter the "pioneer" tag would be a reference to her achievements as a fighter in the UFC. If we're going to pretend that isn't the logical assumption, then I'd say when they called her an MMA Pioneer it might just be the fact that she had the pointiest elbows in the UFC. So it's you who's missing the point by a nautical mile here. It's not an assessment of who has brought in the most money, it's who has the pointiest elbows.
I can kinda understand Kotaku because they started off as something else, but who the fuck reads Waypoint? What kind of braindead dribbler actually consumes that nonsense unironically?
What the fuck is "transmisogynistic "???
Are we just making up words now and ignoring all the other majority studies agreeing with Ronda?
I’m tired of having to learn new “woke- abulary” every two seconds. Let’s just call everything “smurf”. It’ll make life so much easier.I made up the word fellatial in my reply in response to this.
Are you being serious? Her career was totally manufactured(though for the benefit of the womens division). The second the division was legit and real competition started to come she left before her image was destroyed. She was the UFC version of Gina Carano.It isn't the logical assumption. You're rambling. She was the biggest star on the roster and pioneered the way for women, not in MMA perhaps, but the UFC, which is the premier platform for the sport. Barely anyone else has as much star power as her in the fighting scene.
Holmes did that.merely want to erase her as a person.
Noted MMA pioneer
Worst journalists ever if they think writing a bunch of articles complaining will change anythingthose 'journalists' are just bullies, trying to bully companies to do what they want
Armchair slacktivism at its finestWorst journalists ever if they think writing a bunch of articles complaining will change anything
I see you too have picked up on Scopa 's simmering love for all things Kingdom HeartsWhat's wrong with you Scopa ?
Don`t you like headlines like this?
"Kingdom Hearts' True Magic Isn't Disney, It's Men Showing Vulnerability
The Square Enix mashup franchise hasn't lasted more than 15 years because you can visit the world of 'Frozen,' it's the surprising meditation on toxic masculinity."
Doesn't it turn you on? It's KH3 and this is a game about fighting toxic masculinity.
/s
The Square Enix mashup franchise hasn't lasted more than 15 years because you can visit the world of 'Frozen,' it's the surprising meditation on toxic masculinity."
Possibly the most moronic thing I have ever had the misfortune of reading.What's wrong with you Scopa ?
Don`t you like headlines like this?
"Kingdom Hearts' True Magic Isn't Disney, It's Men Showing Vulnerability
The Square Enix mashup franchise hasn't lasted more than 15 years because you can visit the world of 'Frozen,' it's the surprising meditation on toxic masculinity."
Doesn't it turn you on? It's KH3 and this is a game about fighting toxic masculinity.
/s
I guess it's too much projection and expectations on simply fictional characters. But I think both Kotaku and Waypoint are ERA's bitches so that's why they pander too much to that audience.Yes it is exactly that draw that brings people in your moron. These people are so disconnected from reality it actually scares me a bit sometimes.
she was great in beating up soccermoms that did mma on the side. once the sport went fully professional she was out.
She did everything she could to duck Cris Cyborg and later we found out why.
It isn't the logical assumption. You're rambling. She was the biggest star on the roster and pioneered the way for women, not in MMA perhaps, but the UFC, which is the premier platform for the sport. Barely anyone else has as much star power as her in the fighting scene.
ftfy, specially Vice and Kotaku.Just imagine now how fellatial the article would've been if it was one of the Williams sisters as Jax and you'll see whygamingGame "journalism" is a joke now.
I can kinda understand Kotaku because they started off as something else, but who the fuck reads Waypoint? What kind of braindead dribbler actually consumes that nonsense unironically?
The fact of the matter is, when activists say "the science is still unknown" what they really mean is "the science does not support my own political viewpoint."No she would not have the same muscles because part of the change process involves taking a lot of stuff that inhibits muscle growth.
If that is enough to level the competition, we dunno, most studies I've read fall into the 'fuck of we know' category because number of athletes tested and funding is small.
There are als concerns about bone density of course
as i said before, i'm no expert..but in all the studies i've seen is reported that science still doesn't know exactly what is the precise cause of the blatant difference in physical performance between genders.The fact of the matter is, when activists say "the science is still unknown" what they really mean is "the science does not support my own political viewpoint."
It is ridiculous to argue that a biological male and a biological female are on equal footing in sports. Feminists fought for decades to have womens sports teams, and the reason is because there are obvious physical differences between men and women. PEOPLE are not on equal footing in sports. Some win the genetic lottery and are more physically capable than others. The question is, whether being a biological male gives one an unfair advantage, and the answer is yes.
Real science begins with a question and seeks an answer, whatever that answer may be. Activist science begins with a conclusion and seeks any small kernel of truth to support that conclusion. In today's environment, we need to be more cautious of the source of information and be able to recognize advocacy research.