Should be a bigger difference between portable and docked, right? Given the power consumption is like 4:1
I was so busy that I probably missed 90% of all switch 2 news so is there a page that details that? Link to me pls.
This was old predictions with T239 circulating for a couple years along with the github nvidia leaks.
Fan in dock could be changing this to higher clocks.
I just want to make sure that whatever number is circulating is not the dock power consumption, which was 60W leaked a couple months ago but includes USB charging for accessories. which would also include the USB ports, charging battery, charging joycons, etc. ~30-45W seems reasonable Docked mode. Like I said, if there's new info in the last couple of days, I'm interested.
So this put switch 2 around series s perf.
No no
Its in an odd place.
It has a more modern architecture than PS4 base. Not quite the TFLops of a PS4 pro, but leveraging the paradigm shifts Ampere had in asynchronous compute and all the memory improvements along with ML & RT dedicated cores, it will do things that PS4 or PS4 pro could not, and probably some case where PS4 pro can do things when very focused on raster than Switch 2 won't. (DLSS upscaling helps a shitload though to be honest).
The ARM CPU is more modern and has a punch in terms of IPC core for core compared to Jaguar.
But Series S, and of course the other consoles, have much better CPU just by pure principle that they have much higher clocks.
Switch 2 will be somewhere in-between crossgen. It has much better I/O than PS4 HDD, it has a decompression engine, it has fast internal storage, etc, more akin to modern console data streaming. It has mesh shaders from modern architectures which was not a thing back in PS4 days.
But no, I think Series S is safe. DLSS though might give it a run for its money image quality wise. Imo FSR 1 & 2 on those consoles was terrible.