Steve Youngblood
Member
That's all fair. I just want to reiterate that social spending programs are not necessarily the heart of my liberal views. It's not like I'm a liberal just because of modern day Robin Hood ideals. Yes, I might somewhat agree with the ideals behind these programs, and I might also not shed any tears for Richie Rich who exists in a higher tax bracket to fund them, but that's really not the crux of my political beliefs. I'm completely open to moderate views on fiscal issues, even if I skew slightly liberal.HokieJoe said:The abuse and overall mismanagement of the programs I work with are what makes me very skeptical that a universal health care system will be any less of a boondoggle. I know it's a complicated issue, and I don't want to whitewash the issue, but my experience leaves me with a decided lack of faith in government bureaucracy's ability to deal with something as large as universal health care. Moreover, there are privacy issues that I'd rather be dealt with at the private level (for liabilities sake) as opposed to a government administered program.
All that said, I realize that some changes need to be made to the system. For instance, too many hospitals are in competition with one another selling pricey services like MRI's, CAT scans, and like. Ideally, expensive machines like that should be situated regionally to minimize the competitive pressures. There are many other health care issues that need to be tackled head on (like prospective care), but I favor a very large ration of well reasoned debate before giving the Feds a mandate. I would prefer that a regulation be kept at the absolute minimum to improve the system and ultimately, promote better competition.
I am, however, staunchly liberal on many other issues, though.