jey_16 said:
Anyone that has even followed McCain over the years can tell that Palin wasn't his choice for VP and his advisers were the ones that convinced him. Despite Palin's shortcomings, can anyone even think of a way that McCain could pull this out with a stronger more traditional Mitt/Huck/Lieberman as VP?AniHawk said:My dad described McCain/Palin as an arranged marriage. I thought it was the perfect description.
I disagree. To me the word "elitist" mean gated communities, depending on "legacy" to get into a good uni, country clubs meant only for the rich, people who are snobby because they come from a family with a high pedigree, stuff like that. Whether it actually means that or not, those are the things it evokes in my mind. Working as hard as you can to be the best you can be or being born with natural gifts of intellect and ability is not what it brings to mind. Dems are better off not touching the word, or, if they are willing, try to brand the Republicans as elitists.LuCkymoON said:The DNC should put out an AD to take back the words Elite and Elitist.
The ad would go along the lines of starting with how great America is compared to the rest of the world. It will then follow up with the definition of Elitism and end with all Americans are Elite.
/cut to scene of Obama standing on a cliff overlooking the grand canyon
"I'm Barack Obama and I'm proud to be an American!"
![]()
oh wow they even sourced. i love thatGhaleonEB said:And today Obama ran his first ad directly attacking Palin, and he calls her nothing less than a liar.
not to mention the huge gulf in education level between democrats and republicans. it all ties in. i love how they mention that he went to an ivy league school as if that's something he should be ashamed of. good lordHsieh said:You guys are looking the word "elitist" all wrong. Why is Obama, a man who has recently made a few million self made dollars of his book sales, considered elite, while McCain, who's family is worth somewhere around $100 million dollars considered not elite? People don't literally mean that Obama is an "elitist", they're using "elitist" as a code word. "Elitist" is a culture war code word for urban America. There is currently a culture war between urban "blue states" and rural "red states". Obama was first called an "elitist" after his "bitter-gate" comments which were aimed squarely at rural America. When Obama is called an elitist, that doesn't mean he's a rich guy who's out of touch with America, it's a code word meaning he's a city slicker, a damn yankee, a liberul, etc.
The funniest part is that Biden and Obama both voted for the "Bridge to Nowhere" (H.R. 3058). McCain was not present for the vote.Socreges said:oh wow they even sourced. i love that
Well the republican party the last decade has basically been an association of 3 parts of society.Socreges said:not to mention the huge gulf in education level between democrats and republicans. it all ties in. i love how they mention that he went to an ivy league school as if that's something he should be ashamed of. good lord
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html
god damnit, america
I'd wager that this is just as commonplace in other countries as well and that the analogy holds true with their 'football' players.kevm3 said:I'm liking what I see in that Obama is starting to make more ads attacking Palin and McCain with FACTS. I may get around to donating another 25 with the next check.
What absolutely boggles my mind is the low standard that many Americans hold for the highest office in the land. They hold football players more accountable than that. Do you think anybody would want a runningback on their team who they felt they could just sit down and have a beer with or do they want the runningback who they know can perform? Apparently, having the intelligence to do your job as an American president is a bad thing, yet nobody would say, "Hey, that guy's too athletic for running back. He thinks he's better than us!"
Not nearly as controversial if you don't post the full amount:Agent Icebeezy said:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/08/AR2008090803088.html?hpid=topnews
Until the GOP throw her to the wolves, we are going to see stuff like this everyday.
The last paragraph is kind of shameful in its own way. Jay must be thrilled.Palin, who earns $125,000 a year, claimed and received $16,951 as her allowance, which officials say was permitted because her official "duty station" is Juneau, according to an analysis of her travel documents by The Washington Post.
The governor's daughters and husband charged the state $43,490 to travel, and many of the trips were between their house in Wasilla and Juneau, the capital city 600 miles away, the documents show.
Gubernatorial spokeswoman Sharon Leighow said Monday that Palin's expenses are not unusual and that, under state policy, the first family could have claimed per diem expenses for each child taken on official business but has not done so.
But they never claimed they did and that funding was a small part of that bill.devilhawk said:The funniest part is that Biden and Obama both voted for the "Bridge to Nowhere" (H.R. 3058). McCain was not present for the vote.
Did Biden or Obama say that they said "thanks, but no thanks" to the bridge to nowhere and did they base their Mavrickness on that?devilhawk said:The funniest part is that Biden and Obama both voted for the "Bridge to Nowhere" (H.R. 3058). McCain was not present for the vote.
errr, that doesn't seem at all funny. did they say they were "against it from the beginning", as she did? they're pointing out blatant lies, not misguided support.devilhawk said:The funniest part is that Biden and Obama both voted for the "Bridge to Nowhere" (H.R. 3058). McCain was not present for the vote.
yeah that's well known, but thanksdevilhawk said:Well the republican party the last decade has basically been an association of 3 parts of society.
You can definitely consider some Republicans 'elite.'
- 1.The typically lesser educated rural population
2. The social conservatives and evangelicals
3. The higher educated, fiscally conservative rich
It is sort of funny but they have no relevance to the actual issue.Socreges said:errr, that doesn't seem at all funny. did they say they were "against it from the beginning", as she did? they're pointing out blatant lies, not misguided support.
Any time.yeah that's well known, but thanks
kevm3 said:I think Barack should make his community organizing days his version of McCain's POW POW POW. "As a community organizer, I hit the streets of Chicago and was DIRECTLY responsible for helping the American people."
It would be excellent if Barack used the aikido approach to his ads. Use the republicans energy against them. If they keep onattacking Barack, he should run an ads ofthem making these attacks and say, "In a time when Americans need the most help, the Republicans can't stop talking about Barack. That's not change. With Americans lacking healthcare, a crumbling infrastructure, etc., we are at a turning point. What about the issues?"
Here is another idea.
Show a chef mixing up ingredients... "Karl Rove playbook? Check. "Voted with Bush 90 percent of the time? Check. "Refusing to talk about the issues? Check." This is not a recipe for change, this is a recipe for the same.
It's been around for a few decades, actually.mckmas8808 said:Oh crap Alan Keyes using the media elites line back in 2004! :lol :lol
What's with this excuse?
The correct term is "Rope a hope".polyh3dron said:They're doing the rope a dope guys.... right?
I can't speak for anyone else, but most people (who aren't voting out of tradition only) are definitely voting on issues, policies and competence first and foremost in my country.devilhawk said:I'd wager that this is just as commonplace in other countries as well and that the analogy holds true with their 'football' players.
Chrono said:http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/09/opinion/09goldberg.html
This stuff scares the hell out of me, and annoying too because I know it'll take a few days to forget about that possibility.
The author is wrong on Barack though. If somebody is voting on just this single issue, Big O slaughters McCain. Of course that's assuming the voter is intelligent and knowledgeable, otherwise McCain will claim that having been strapped to a chair and bitch-slapped by a half-naked Vietnamese dude makes him the clear winner on this issue.
Chrono said:http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/09/opinion/09goldberg.html
This stuff scares the hell out of me, and annoying too because I know it'll take a few days to forget about that possibility.
The author is wrong on Barack though. If somebody is voting on just this single issue, Big O slaughters McCain. Of course that's assuming the voter is intelligent and knowledgeable, otherwise McCain will claim that having been strapped to a chair and bitch-slapped by a half-naked Vietnamese dude makes him the clear winner on this issue.
He's just one of the many things wrong with GOP.maximum360 said:Keyes is a nutcase, pure and simple. He's an embarrassment to the GOP. :lol
Arde5643 said:He's just one of the many things wrong with GOP.
Also Palin was gov. of Alaska, she should be paying attention to the projects coming in and take stances on them. Biden and Obama have no reason to be worrying about projects going into Alaska when they were just senators from Illinois and Delware and not candidates for president at the time, it would be very weird for them at the time to take stances on various spending that have nothing to do with either the nation at large or their states.polyh3dron said:Did Biden or Obama say that they said "thanks, but no thanks" to the bridge to nowhere and did they base their Mavrickness on that?
Didn't think so.
maximum360 said:Keyes is a nutcase, pure and simple. He's an embarrassment to the GOP. :lol
ToyMachine228 said:So Bush wants to pull 8,000 troops from Iraq. A good thing, but I'm angered by the fact that it's another political ploy to try to leave the Whitehouse with a more positive image.
Student GOP leader resigns over Obama remark
By MICHAEL RUBINKAM, Associated Press
ALLENTOWN, Pa. The leader of a statewide group of college Republicans has been forced to resign after posting racially insensitive comments about Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama on the Internet.
Adam LaDuca, 21, the former executive director of the Pennsylvania Federation of College Republicans, wrote on his Facebook page in late July that Obama has "a pair of lips so large he could float half of Cuba to the shores of Miami (and probably would.)"
LaDuca, who previously had called Martin Luther King Jr. a "pariah" and a "fraud," also wrote: "And man, if sayin' someone has large lips is a racial slur, then we're ALL in trouble."
The College Republicans asked LaDuca to resign after his remarks were publicized by the Pennsylvania Progressive, a blog written by a Democratic committeeman from Berks County. The group announced LaDuca's resignation on its Web site Friday.
"The comments were completely uncalled for and very offensive," said Anthony Pugliese, 22, a senior at West Chester University and chairman of the College Republicans, an umbrella group with more than 50 chapters statewide. "The P-A College Republicans do not accept or tolerate racism in any way."
LaDuca said Monday that he regrets posting the comments and understands how they can be construed as racist. "In hindsight, when you read it a second time, it's like, 'oops,'" he said. "It was just a dumb move on my part to make a statement like that public."
He said he is not a racist and that he admires prominent blacks such as economist and author Thomas Sowell and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. He compared the comment about Obama to jokes about Republican presidential nominee John McCain's thinning hair or President Bush's large ears.
LaDuca is a senior at Kutztown University. Two years ago, Kutztown's College Republicans chapter was heavily criticized for holding a "bake sale" to protest affirmative action in which whites were charged more for cookies than blacks. LaDuca, then the group's spokesman, made a public apology on the group's behalf
lawblob said:Check this out, the Young Republicans of tomorrow!
Truly the party is in good hands for the future..
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate John McCain has gained huge support and now leads Democrat Barack Obama among white women voters since naming Sarah Palin as his running mate, according to a survey published on Tuesday.
Before the Democratic National Convention in late August, Obama held an 8 percentage point lead among white women voters, 50 percent to 42 percent, but after the Republican convention in early September, McCain was ahead by 12 points among white women, 53 percent to 41 percent, the poll found.
VanMardigan said:
Chrono said:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-mckay/were-gonna-frickin-lose-t_b_124772.html
I'm not panicking, just thought that was a good read so here's the link for anybody with a few minutes to kill.
VanMardigan said:
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/mommy-quotient.htmlVanMardigan said:
The ABC News finding that Sarah Palin dramatically upped John McCain's support among white women is one I'm not entirely convinced by, mostly because other polling by the same agency shows Sarah Palin performing worse among women than she does among men.
because they're richer than those who are over there.HylianTom said:What I want to know: why aren't these chickenshit College Republicans over in Iraq fighting right now?
If they believe so fervently that this war is so goddamn vital to the survival of our nation - that this is a war out of necessity - then why aren't their asses over there fighting it?