NullPointer said:That's not very helpful.
You are an enabler
NullPointer said:That's not very helpful.
There's that. There's also the fact that I'll bet a dollar to anyone's dime that whether you elect Obama or McCain, nothing of any significance is going to happen in regards to abortion.Cloudy said:There are other things happening in this world besides abortion, people!
Steve Youngblood said:There's that. There's also the fact that I'll bet a dollar to anyone's dime that whether you elect Obama or McCain, nothing of any significance is going to happen in regards to abortion.
How fukking selfish/apathetic/ignorant/arrogant do you have to be to become a one-issue voter?
AniHawk said:On Gay Marriage and Religion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZxiVnuFFoI
Branduil said:If you really wanted to disarm the anti-abortion vote, the Dems would adopt a platform less fervently pro-abortion rights.
That's your opinion.Cloudy said:I think religious zealots out there should just stop trying to rule everyone's lives. It's 2008 and abortions are never gonna be banned. They need to deal with it! No one is encouraging abortions, Dems just value a woman's right to choose in a FREE country!
With all the crap going on in this country, abortion is the last thing on SANE people's minds during this election.. *sigh*
Branduil said:If you really wanted to disarm the anti-abortion vote, the Dems would drop-kick the GOP so bad in EVs this cycle that Republicans would never aggressively pursue abortion as a wedge issue ever again.
Branduil said:That's your opinion.
There are others who believe that if a fetus is human and alive, it deserves all the protection anyone else has, and if they're being slaughtered in mass numbers, it really is the most important issue of the day.
But we've discussed this before so I'm going to stop now unless someone adds a salient point to the discussion. And your wild-eyed ranting is really anything but.
Branduil said:That's your opinion.
There are others who believe that if a fetus is human and alive, it deserves all the protection anyone else has, and if they're being slaughtered in mass numbers, it really is the most important issue of the day.
But we've discussed this before so I'm going to stop now unless someone adds a salient point to the discussion. And your wild-eyed ranting is really anything but.
I don't think it will require a de-emphasis as much as a re-framing.Fragamemnon said:fixy fixy .
Values voters, prepare to meet the underside of the bus after McCain gets beat in November. The GOP will be scrambling to form a coalition that can beat the new Democratic majority of Aftrican Americans+urban/suburban whites+Hispanics, and that'll probably require a de-emphasis on traditional social conservative issues.
reilo said:Well, maybe when republicans stop being such hypocrites and stop slaughtering men, women, and children by starting unnecessary wars and being so staunchly pro-death penalty, then they might have a leg to stand on this abortion debate. Until then, they need to keep their mouths shut.
Fragamemnon said:fixy fixy .
Values voters, prepare to meet the underside of the bus after McCain gets beat in November. The GOP will be scrambling to form a coalition that can beat the new Democratic majority of Aftrican Americans+urban/suburban whites+Hispanics, and that'll probably require a de-emphasis on traditional social conservative issues.
Fragamemnon said:fixy fixy .
Values voters, prepare to meet the underside of the bus after McCain gets beat in November. The GOP will be scrambling to form a coalition that can beat the new Democratic majority of Aftrican Americans+urban/suburban whites+Hispanics, and that'll probably require a de-emphasis on traditional social conservative issues.
Branduil said:That's your opinion.
There are others who believe that if a fetus is human and alive, it deserves all the protection anyone else has, and if they're being slaughtered in mass numbers, it really is the most important issue of the day.
But we've discussed this before so I'm going to stop now unless someone adds a salient point to the discussion. And your wild-eyed ranting is really anything but.
Branduil said:I don't think it will require a de-emphasis as much as a re-framing.
I believe there are significant numbers of pro-life Hispanics and African Americans that could come into play if the Republicans are smart in the future.
If everyone who ever did or said anything hypocritical stayed silent on every moral issue because of that, blacks would still be slaves and women wouldn't be able to vote.
Well, it at least solves the problem of implicitly-sanctioned murder.PhoenixDark said:Banning abortion solves absolutely nothing. It would be prohibition all over again, just with more bloody hangers than machine guns.
Curbing the amount of abortions is the only logical way to tackle the subject, and that process would involve issues that republicans are typically not concerned with - such as education, helping the poor (not handouts), etc
Branduil said:Well, it at least solves the problem of implicitly-sanctioned murder.
I don't see why you assume that banning abortion automatically means taking no other steps to stop it after that.
Because republicans want to have their cake and eat it, too. They don't want to ban just abortion: they want to ban sex all together. Their entire agenda over the past few years has been to stop ordinary people from sticking their genitals in places that don't concern them.Branduil said:Well, it at least solves the problem of implicitly-sanctioned murder.
I don't see why you assume that banning abortion automatically means taking no other steps to stop it after that.
PhoenixDark said:I'd love to hear your ideas on these "other steps"
reilo said:Because republicans want to have their cake and eat it, too. They don't want to ban just abortion: they want to ban sex all together. Their entire agenda over the past few years has been to stop ordinary people from sticking their genitals in places that don't concern them.
The health care issue cannot be blamed on one party... and it's really not the government's job to teach people to be responsible.Jak140 said:Why not worry about the fact that the US has the highest infant mortality rate in the industrialized world? Why not care for the babies that are born wanted and die because our health care system is shit due to the Republicans blocking legislation to reform it instead of concerning yourself with women who are keeping unwanted children out of poverty by being responsible? Why not vote for a party that will increase funding for sex education programs that teach about birth control to reduce unwanted pregnancies and abortions instead of voting for one that says it will outlaw abortion but never does?
DenogginizerOS said:Obama should remind people about what this administration and its supporters said just a year ago, "We can't afford!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TMDUNEPNt8
Meanwhile, the Democrats will gradually move from slightly-right-of-centre to slightly-left-of-centre by the time the process finishes stabilising. A lot of the issues currently espoused by Liberalism will disappear from the political discourse as they become par for the course for both sides.HylianTom said:The GOP had better begin to shift; otherwise, they will be relegated to permanent minority status in two or three election cycles.
We're going to see some real fireworks from the far-far-right as the process unfolds. It's not going to be pretty.
If you don't think republicans have been pushing for abstinence only for decades now, then you sir, are quite naive.Dr_Cogent said:Public hangings. :lol
:lol
GAF, never change. Please, I need a good laugh from time to time.
Branduil said:Well, it at least solves the problem of implicitly-sanctioned murder.
gkrykewy said:You are an enabler
reilo said:If you don't think republicans have been pushing for abstinence only for decades now, then you sir, are quite naive.
Or maybe you just don't know what abstinence only means?
If McCain wins and gets a couple of Supreme Court appointments, Roe v. Wade is good as dead.Steve Youngblood said:There's that. There's also the fact that I'll bet a dollar to anyone's dime that whether you elect Obama or McCain, nothing of any significance is going to happen in regards to abortion.
_leech_ said:That's disgusting... talk about ass backward priorities.
Money for access, plain and simple.WASHINGTON One of the giant mortgage companies at the heart of the credit crisis paid $15,000 a month from the end of 2005 through last month to a firm owned by Senator John McCains campaign manager, according to two people with direct knowledge of the arrangement.
The disclosure undercuts a statement by Mr. McCain on Sunday night that the campaign manager, Rick Davis, had had no involvement with the company for the last several years.
Mr. Daviss firm received the payments from the company, Freddie Mac, until it was taken over by the government this month along with Fannie Mae, the other big mortgage lender whose deteriorating finances helped precipitate the cascading problems on Wall Street, the people said.
They said they did not recall Mr. Daviss doing much substantive work for the company in return for the money, other than speak to a political action committee of high-ranking employees in October 2006 on the approaching midterm Congressional elections. They said Mr. Daviss firm, Davis & Manafort, had been kept on the payroll because of Mr. Daviss close ties to Mr. McCain, the Republican presidential nominee, who by 2006 was widely expected to run again for the White House.
Branduil said:I'd also like to know how Republicans would outlaw abortion. It's not as if they're not trying, but we pretty much have no chance unless several liberal-leaning justices retire and are replaced by conservative ones.
Branduil said:I'd also like to know how Republicans would outlaw abortion. It's not as if they're not trying, but we pretty much have no chance unless several liberal-leaning justices retire and are replaced by conservative ones.
speculawyer said:If McCain wins and gets a couple of Supreme Court appointments, Roe v. Wade is good as dead.
Several? No. One.Branduil said:I'd also like to know how Republicans would outlaw abortion. It's not as if they're not trying, but we pretty much have no chance unless several liberal-leaning justices retire and are replaced by conservative ones.
GhaleonEB said:The Times' just gave Obama a gift basket.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/24/us/politics/w24davis.html?hp
McCain Aides Firm Was Paid by Freddie Mac
Money for access, plain and simple.
Might be why Schmidt was trashing the Times so hard - both for the previous article, and because they were investigating this. Something tells me Obama will be talking about this for the rest of the election.
Actually it is.NullPointer said:It's not murder if its officially sanctioned.
Dr_Cogent said:I guess you are just fucking retarded then. You said that they are trying to ban sex altogether. Preaching abstinence is not trying to ban anything. Words mean things. Maybe you should learn how to fucking use them. They have just as much a right to preach abstinence as others have to preach promiscuity.
If you actually had said what you just said now, I wouldn't have called out your idiotic comment in the first place.
Branduil said:Actually it is.
Yeah, quite clearly, I'm the retarded one. Because this administration never placed contingencies on educational funding by requiring abstinence-only education.Dr_Cogent said:I guess you are just fucking retarded then. You said that they are trying to ban sex altogether. Preaching abstinence is not trying to ban anything. Words mean things. Maybe you should learn how to fucking use them.
GhaleonEB said:The Times' just gave Obama a gift basket.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/24/us/politics/w24davis.html?hp
McCain Aides Firm Was Paid by Freddie Mac
Money for access, plain and simple.
Might be why Schmidt was trashing the Times so hard - both for the previous article, and because they were investigating this. Something tells me Obama will be talking about this for the rest of the election.
These are the truest words I've read in years. Social conservatives need to really understand this, as history continues to back this up, election cycle after election cycle.OuterWorldVoice said:See - here's the thing. They do not wish to get rid of their main wedge issue. They don't care about babies. They care about dividing people and taking advantage of your "passion." In short, the republican party is playing you for a fucking idiot.
No, actually, you're the one trying to do that. You fail, but thanks for trying.OuterWorldVoice said:See - here's the thing. They do not wish to get rid of their main wedge issue. They don't care about babies. They care about dividing people and taking advantage of your "passion." In short, the republican party is playing you for a fucking idiot.
I think you know this and I think you prefer the "appearance" of morality that the party offers.
Tyrone Slothrop said:i think in the trajectory of 50 years you'll see the complete dissolution of the GOP unless they finally eschew screwball far-right ideology. i honestly can't see a future where people equate abortion with murder and decry homosexuality. they're just silly and regressive and it's only a matter of time until joe america realizes that.