maximum360
Member
Cheebs said:Fineman is one of my favorite journalists. Do you have a link (or more detail) of what he said?
Fineman's okay. I just hate the fact that he pushes the "Obama is arrogant" argument every time he's on the air.
Cheebs said:Fineman is one of my favorite journalists. Do you have a link (or more detail) of what he said?
MightyHedgehog said:I don't think the we can really have a really meaningful argument about a VP's worth while in office until we actually see them in office. In a post-Cheney American politics, we will probably see the VP take a greater role in things no matter who gets elected. Now, if we're talking about the reality of a VP moving up to fill in for the President in the case that it's necessary, I don't think there's much argument on why it does actually matter who seems fit for that possibility. We are not in a 'caretaker' President cycle...no coasting is going to be acceptable here.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#26462525Cheebs said:Fineman is one of my favorite journalists. Do you have a link (or more detail) of what he said?
No, I'm not. People are being forced to rationalize their support for the republican ticket against the new information of McCain's pick for vice-president, and would rather jump through mental hoops like "she's a mother of five, that's experience enough!" than admit their support is less justified in any way and insist she's a perfect candidate.PantherLotus said:hitokage, you're overusing and misusing the term cognitive dissonance.
Certainly, and the quality of that decision is directly reflected in the perceived quality of the pick...in the perceived quality of the VP as a working position and not just some hat-trick political stunt that only works until elected. It's both and I think Obama picked well. Earlier, someone, I think, correctly pointed out Obama picked mostly based on how to better achieve his goals once in office, while McCain picked based on how to better his chances to get elected.BenjaminBirdie said:I think, and rightfully so, this isn't a question about the value of a VP, but the nature and process of a Presidential candidate's decision making.
Blackwater Issues Mercenary Call For Hurricane Gustav
Email disseminated 29 August 2008 from Blackwater Worldwide
Security for Hurricane Gustav
Blackwater is compiling a list of qualified security personnel for possible deployment into areas affected by Hurricane Gustav.
Applicants must meet all items listed under the respective Officer posting and be US citizens. Contract length is TBD.
basik said:isnt the national guard supposed to be doing this? how much of the guard from these areas is in iraq?
http://www.legitgov.org/blackwater_mercenary_call_for_gustav.html
PantherLotus said:hitokage, you're overusing and misusing the term cognitive dissonance.
Hitokage said:No, I'm not. People are being forced to rationalize their support for the republican ticket against the new information of McCain's pick for vice-president, and would rather jump through mental hoops like "she's more experienced than Obama! she had five kids!" than admit their support is less justified in any way.
basik said:isnt the national guard supposed to be doing this? how much of the guard from these areas is in iraq?
http://www.legitgov.org/blackwater_mercenary_call_for_gustav.html
The LA NG is currently being mobilized to help relief efforts. They're not in Iraq atm.Tamanon said:The National Guard is absolutely strapped right now with Iraq. Although.......I'm still wary of Blackwater.
looters am shot by trigger happy ninjas news at 11basik said:isnt the national guard supposed to be doing this? how much of the guard from these areas is in iraq?
http://www.legitgov.org/blackwater_mercenary_call_for_gustav.html
All of these are completely different concepts.PantherLotus said:groupthink
doublethink
bullshitting
lying
etc
Obama, you're being too nice... what if Palin starts to impress a lot of people and his campaign has to start being critical of her?lexdysia said:60 Minutes Interview w/ Obama and Biden
Obama says Biden is ready to step in and be president.
He also says McCain's vice presidential choice is an "up and coming public servant."
Hitokage said:All of these are completely different concepts.
No, lying is when you know the truth but consciously decide to make statements to the contrary. Groupthink is when your faction has an unhealthy influence on your decisions, which is closer but not really the same thing.PantherLotus said:and they all apply
They've got a contract thing on their website under careers for it. Specifically for armed police officers and armed security guys.NLB2 said:The LA NG is currently being mobilized to help relief efforts. They're not in Iraq atm.
The Blackwater roll call looks like a good oportunity for some GAFers to make good money.
That's beautiful.maximum360 said:
Diablos said:I think the polling last week was a wakeup call for Obama. I hope so, anyway.
Juice said:Wow. The rally in Dublin, Ohio was really awesome. Absolutely huge crowd. Filled a pretty large high school arena including 75% of the field.
Obama's speech was mostly stump + a few of the saying he threw together for the Thursday. Biden's speech was very solid too, citing multiple foreign policy examples where Obama's position opposed McCain was later validated by later facts. Biden got into a really good flow with the chorus line "John McCain was wrong, Barack Obama was right!"
Overally, they've really put together a tight message against McCain. He's citing a lot of specific policy proposals, but was very clear in stating opposition to McCain. Overall, this machine is way better oiled for attacks then it was a week ago.
Diablos said:Obama, you're being too nice... what if Palin starts to impress a lot of people and his campaign has to start being critical of her?
Then you hit her on her policies and that's an easy target since she represents not only McCain's own shared views with the unpopular outgoing Bush administration, but also the social conservatives/religious right. If anything, I think McCain's choice of Palin makes it even easier to fight through simple compare and contrast. No Dem has to get nasty when McCain made it easier to paint his position as effectively more of the same. All of the bulletpoints about Palin can be worked over by Dems simply because she, like McCain, represents the same old shit that's thrown away all of the progress made in the Clinton years. If they do it right, it shouldn't be difficult to discredit the reformer image McCain needs to have in order to win. Just hammering based on the record should be good enough.Diablos said:Obama, you're being too nice... what if Palin starts to impress a lot of people and his campaign has to start being critical of her?
Agreed, but just remember: Her numbers are about as bad as what Dan Quayle had. Did that stop him from becoming VP for four years? Nope.NullPointer said:I dunno. Palin seems like the kind of choice that will implode on its own. I don't see a need for Dems to go on the offense and break out the pitchforks.
Once Republicans settle into their safe little "the world is a dangerous place filled with terrorists, rogue regimes, and thawing cold war conflicts", 24 hour all-fear-all-the-time cycle, people will see this all in a different light - and not one that's beneficial to the Republican ticket.
In this age of Global Wars on Terror, government continuity is a lot closer to peoples minds than it has been in a while.
That doesn't take a whole lot of effort, and it still doesn't exclude CNN from having one of the worst years of political coverage I have ever seen.UltimaKilo said:In my opinion, the CNN specials on McCain and Obama are much better than the ones FOXNEWS did.
Yes, but this is assuming she continues to poll poorly. She could very well get a legitimate convention bounce if she gives a compelling speech and continues to campaign hard. Obama might be better off keeping the more brutal cards close to his chest, but he shouldn't forget about them.MightyHedgehog said:Then you hit her on her policies and that's an easy target since she represents not only McCain's own shared views with the unpopular outgoing Bush administration, but also the social conservatives/religious right. If anything, I think McCain's choice of Palin makes it even easier to fight through simple compare and contrast. No Dem has to get nasty when McCain made it easier to paint his position as effectively more of the same. All of the bulletpoints about Palin can be worked over by Dems simply because she, like McCain, represents the same old shit that's thrown away all of the progress made in the Clinton years. If they do it right, it shouldn't be difficult to discredit the reformer image McCain needs to have in order to win. Just hammering based on the record should be good enough.
mckmas8808 said:Yeah 19,000 people were there with you today. That's more than you said had tickets.
Diablos said:Agreed, but just remember: Her numbers are about as bad as what Dan Quayle had. Did that stop him from becoming VP for four years? Nope.
That doesn't take a whole lot of effort, and it still doesn't exclude CNN from having one of the worst years of political coverage I have ever seen.
Diablos said:Obama, you're being too nice... what if Palin starts to impress a lot of people and his campaign has to start being critical of her?
"About an hour and a half ago 20 to 30 heavily armed police officers surrounded the house," Whelan said. "One of my roommates said 'I want to see a warrant' and she was immediately detained."
Whelan said it was especially perplexing that the police would target his home.
"There's nothing here," he said, "These are the "checking" people. They're not even going to be in the demonstration. Some are lawyers."
Whelan says his roommate, Erin Stalmaker, went out to talk to talk to the police. She asked the officers why they were there. The officers asked why people were running away from them. Erin reportedly told the officers that their drawn automatic weapons probably had something to do with it. She was detained after asking to see a warrant.
Your right. The Obama Campaign even admitted they had been working on gathering a ton of material on pawlenty and Romney. When Palin was announced they could hardly find anything.Stoney Mason said:As I said earlier its not so simple as just pounding her. Especially from the lips of Obama. She doesn't have much of a record to go after for one and the fact that she is a historic women for GOP politics does carry some weight. It can also very easily backfire. I thought he played it perfectly. She has to say something and start backing up Mccain's opinions before you start attacking so its substanative attacks and it's not just knee jerk attacks.
Arde5643 said:Anyone read this yet?
http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2008/08/inside-an-rnc-r.html
It seems the police are detaining those who are going to protest at the RNC convention.
The GOP is getting really desperate, and I don't think I want to know what they would do on November to suppress voter turnout.
Stoney Mason said:She has to say something and start backing up Mccain's opinions before you start attacking so its substanative attacks and it's not just knee jerk attacks.
NullPointer said:This.
I think the Obama campaign is letting this thing sink in a little - giving it some time to breathe. I really do think this choice was so blatantly manipulative that McCain/Palin will dig their own hole soon enough.
Once again, I long for the damn debates to start. We NEED to see all of these characters on the same stage, responding to questions and to each other.
All of this pomp and circumstance is just an overly long prelude.
But in contrast with the mild reception that greeted her comments at the Ohio event, when Palin praised Clinton here for showing determination and grace in her presidential campaign, the Alaska governor was met with a noisy mix of boos, groans and grumbles around the minor league ballpark where the Road to the Convention Rally was held.
Palin quickly recovered, promising the audience that female candidates werent yet finished, and that she and McCain were on their way to victory in November.
In a February interview with MTV, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin lavished praise on maverick Republican presidential contender Ron Paul.
She had a few nice things to say about another GOP candidate, Mitt Romney.
But Palin made no mention of John McCain.
Now that McCain is the presumptive Republican presidential candidate, he has selected Palin as his prospective running-mate for vice president.
McCain calls Palin his political "soul-mate."
But, in February, at a point when McCain was closing in on the Republican nomination, it sure sounded like she was sweet on Paul.
The governor, who supported the renegade Republican campaigns of Pat Buchanan in the 1990s (Pat says: "She's a great choice for the base ... She's a Buchananite"), described the anti-war, libertarian-leaning congressman from Texas as "cool."
"He's a good guy," she continued. "He's so independent. He's independent of the party machine. I'm like, ‘Right on, so am I.'"
Conveniently, Paul -- who refuses to endorse McCain -- will be holding an outside-the-convention "Rally for the Republic," which is expected to draw thousands of his ardent supporters to the Target Center in Minneapolis on Tuesday.
Perhaps Palin will join them.
Or is she now with the party machine?
It's Fox News...UltimaKilo said:In my opinion, the CNN specials on McCain and Obama are much better than the ones FOXNEWS did.
Fucked up.Arde5643 said:Anyone read this yet?
http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2008/08/inside-an-rnc-r.html
It seems the police are detaining those who are going to protest at the RNC convention.
The GOP is getting really desperate, and I don't think I want to know what they would do on November to suppress voter turnout.
Most polling doesn't mean shit, IMO. They may serve as a somewhat decent indicator of a general feeling for a moment, but it's fleeting and ultimately not something to base attack opportunities off of. I don't think a more forceful message is ever off the table, but I do think that with almost two months before election day and the debates still yet to come, the plan should be to escalate the core message and not darken it. Just amplifying the differences between the two choices will be successful enough while waiting for McCain/Palin to expose a weakness in their own attack. A serious counter-punch or two is definitely in the cards from Obama/Biden before election day.Diablos said:Yes, but this is assuming she continues to poll poorly. She could very well get a legitimate convention bounce if she gives a compelling speech and continues to campaign hard. Obama might be better off keeping the more brutal cards close to his chest, but he shouldn't forget about them.
Denver had secret jails setup in warehouses etc to detain potential trouble makers etc. Police really go beyond the law when it comes to these political conventions :-/Diablos said:Fucked up.
Arde5643 said:Anyone read this yet?
http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2008/08/inside-an-rnc-r.html
It seems the police are detaining those who are going to protest at the RNC convention.
Tamanon said:http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters/351293/palin_on_ron_paul_right_on_
Ironic thing to say, although she seems to kinda be idealogically opposed to Paul.