Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart | 4K DLSS 3 Gameplay Comparison

I'm so excited to finally play this on PC. Glad I never finished it on PS5, and it's been long enough for me to forget a lot of what I've already done.
 
BennyBlanco said:
I really have no interest in playing this game but kinda wanna get it just to see how it looks maxed out
Click to expand...
It won't look much different. Short of adding path tracing, it's hard to make a game these days look dramatically different. Consoles can use maxed out textures without issues which they could not before and that was probably the single biggest visual upgrade on PC.
 
As long as I can do 4k/60 Maxed, IDGAF.
I preordered this awhile back, expecting a solid game. Last one I went through was Tools of Destruction. That was quite a while ago, but I remember that game being very fun to go through.
I'm really excited to see how Direct Storage works, in real time, the graphical display that Insomniac built, because it looks damned impressive, going by pictures and videos.
 
Gaiff said:
It won't look much different. Short of adding path tracing, it's hard to make a game these days look dramatically different. Consoles can use maxed out textures without issues which they could not before and that was probably the single biggest visual upgrade on PC.
Click to expand...

native 4k/60 will be a huge upgrade on its own
 
The Cockatrice said:
Even without DLSS3, the game runs at 4k at over 70 FPS with RT On. Thats fucking rare. Name any other games that run so well with RT ON, besides maybe Metro Exodus.
Click to expand...

It runs RT @ 40fps and mostly 4K on PS5. Fidelity modes don't drop below 1800p afaik, and even 1800p is rare. 4090 is WELL over 5x faster than a PS5 in RT workloads, so 70fps is dog shit performance relatively speaking. 4090 should be running native 4K/120 at PS5 fidelity settings without even thinking about breaking a sweat. Hell it should be flirting with 240fps all else being equal
 
Last edited:
BennyBlanco said:
native 4k/60 will be a huge upgrade on its own
Click to expand...
You will need lower the quality or use DLSS for that though. In the video, the game drops to 61 fps most likely with a 4090 so in more taxing scenes would be lower.

With quality DLSS mode at 4k game runs at 1440p, just saying :messenger_beaming:
 
Last edited:
Reallink said:
It runs RT @ 40fps and mostly 4K on PS5. Fidelity modes don't drop below 1800p afaik, and even that is rare. 4090 is WELL over 5x faster than a PS5 in RT workloads, so 70fps is dog shit performance relatively speaking. 4090 should be running native 4K/120 at PS5 fidelity settings without even thinking about breaking a sweat.
Click to expand...
Is it at "ps5 fidelity settings" though? That's the question.
 
JimboJones said:
Is it at "ps5 fidelity settings" though? That's the question.
Click to expand...

Probably not, but nothing stands out as being noticeably improved besides the framerate. So the best case argument is they've got terrible "Ultra" settings that are more than halving the performance for visual gains that require 800% zoom freeze frames to point out.
 
Last edited:
Reallink said:
It runs RT @ 40fps and mostly 4K on PS5. Fidelity modes don't drop below 1800p afaik, and even 1800p is rare. 4090 is WELL over 5x faster than a PS5 in RT workloads, so 70fps is dog shit performance relatively speaking. 4090 should be running native 4K/120 at PS5 fidelity settings without even thinking about breaking a sweat. Hell it should be flirting with 240fps all else being equal
Click to expand...
My 7900xt is about 5x the TF power of a PS5. I sure as hell don't get 5x the perf over my PS5.
 
MikeM said:
My 7900xt is about 5x the TF power of a PS5. I sure as hell don't get 5x the perf over my PS5.
Click to expand...

The 7900XT is "only" around 25TF in the single instruction per clock sense that calculates PS5 at 10TF. The 4090 is around 50TFs in the same single instruction/clock sense, with another entire GPU worth of dedicated RT and AI upscaling hardware (which PS5 has none of the 7900XT has like a quarter of).

So 70FPS is in the ballpark (though a little low) of what a 7900XT should be running at native 4K RT, but not a 4090. The 4090 is twice as fast as a 7900XT, which should put into perspective how terrible 70FPS is, its not even achieving a 2x a PS5. If accurate this would be in the running for worst PC port of all time performance wise.
 
Last edited:
DLSS3 is nailing it here. Fuck AMD for being so far behind in their up-scaling tech and frame generation.

Poor PC Gamer: "but AMD cards provide better bang for your buck"
Me: "fuck you"
 
Last edited:
Reallink said:
The 7900XT is "only" around 25TF in the single instruction per clock sense that calculates PS5 at 10TF. The 4090 is around 50TFs in the same single instruction/clock sense, with another entire GPU worth of dedicated RT and AI upscaling hardware (which PS5 has none of the 7900XT has like a quarter of). So 70FPS is in the ballpark (though a little low) of what a 7900XT should be running at native 4K RT, but not a 4090. The 4090 is twice as fast as a 7900XT, which should put into perspective how terrible 70FPS is.
Click to expand...
Ps5 Fp32: 10.28 TF

7900xt fp32: 51.48 TF
 
They Pull Me Back In Al Pacino GIF by The Godfather


I try to not double dip, I really do. But they got me good this time. This looks amazing! Nixxes is Sony's best acquisition ever.

Side note, this has to be industry best localization:

PoAyWpI.jpg


UI, sound, subtitles. And it's top notch as well. Most here obviously don't care but it's perfect for anyone with kids outside of the english talking countries. I had my kids beside me during the whole playthrough. You can imagine how it usually goes when there is no localization… "What did he say? What happened? Who was that? Is that a bad guy? What did they say now?" Etc…. But with local language and voiced characters it's as if they're watching a kids show on TV. No translation needed. It's awesome. Almost nobody else does this, not even Nintendo even though their games are often aimed at kids. Sony seriously deserved a localization of the year award for their work on this title.

Anyhow I'll go through this by myself in english this time.

Will there be haptics if I use a Dualsense?
 
mrcroket said:
You will need lower the quality or use DLSS for that though. In the video, the game drops to 61 fps most likely with a 4090 so in more taxing scenes would be lower.

With quality DLSS mode at 4k game runs at 1440p, just saying :messenger_beaming:
Click to expand...

I have a 4090/13700k build. It will probably do 4k/60 vsync fine.
 
Anyone else using frame generation on cyberpunk 2077 see particles and volumetric at half refresh rate? It is the reason i dont use overdrive. Lighting is a massive step up but everything else takes a hit. I wonder if it will be the same here for frame generation.
 
Enjoy my pc friends! It is a great game.

Ports like this make me think of for next gen is the way to go instead of ps6 or whatever
 
OverHeat said:
I said god damn! as fast as PS5.
Click to expand...


Hmm I think we can already see interesting comparison points between the two here. NVidia RTX IO shows stuttering just before the second portal (0:16), whereas on PS5 there is no stutter (~27:14). I will say I do remember PS5 having this same stutter at this exact spot (among others) back when they did a gameplay showcase prior to release so it's possible/probable that the stutter will get patched in. Also, we don't know asset quality differences yet.

PS5 Timestamped




RTX IO Timestamped

 
MikeM said:
Ps5 Fp32: 10.28 TF

7900xt fp32: 51.48 TF
Click to expand...

Yes that's the new method that counts FP32 and INT32 calculations together, which doubles the TF figure Vs. PS5's single instruction count. This is how the ROG Ally Steamdeck is "9TF" (basically a PS5), but actually doesn't even come close to a decade old GTX970, nevermind a PS5. A "51TF" 7900XT is an equal measure of horse shit, it's a 25TF card in reality and practice. The 4090 is a 100TF card in the double instruction/clock count sense, but it to is a bogus figure, it's 50TF in practice and reality.
 
Last edited:
Reallink said:
Yes that's the new method that counts FP32 and INT32 calculations together, which doubles the TF figure Vs. PS5's single instruction count. This is how the ROG Ally portable is a "9TF system" (basically a PS5), but actually doesn't even come close to a decade old GTX970, nevermind a PS5. A "51TF" 7900XT is an equal measure of horse shit, it's a 25TF card in reality and practice. The 4090 is a 100TF card in the double instruction/clock count sense, but it to is a bogus figure, it's 50TF in practice and reality.
Click to expand...
Any articles proving this?
 
That is super clean. I haven't looked at the PS5 version in a while but that looks better for sure. I notice the shadows and overall amount of detail present and it definitely looks cranked up.

That being said, it really is a testament to the PS5 that this can look marginally better while a person like me can appreciate all the cranked up detail running at 60fps with no compromise and nearly tipple with DLSS3.

This may well be the new benchmark in ports.
 
Seems like a good bump for a RTX 4070. RTX 4090 should reach 300+ FPS. This video was recorded with a 4070, right? Otherwise, the game's optimization is really crappy considering the performance delta between PS5 and RTX 4090. However, this wouldn't be the first Sony port with ridiculous performance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PS5 Pro Enhanced - Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
49
3K
asdasdasdbb replied
Besides AstroBot and Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart, what games use the dual sense features the best?
35
1K
Justin9mm replied
Digital Foundry - Upscaling Face-Off: PS5 Pro PSSR vs PC DLSS/FSR 3.1 in Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
7 8 9 10 11
513
27K
PaintTinJr replied
Good Comparison of DLSS 4 vs 3
13
1K
viveks86 replied
DF - Ratchet and Clank: Rift Apart PS5 Pro vs PS5 Image Quality Face-Off
8 9 10 11 12
575
31K
Kangx replied
Top Bottom