technically you are correct but 5090 is not a real gpu and should not be brought up in any comparisons imo.
1070-1100p and dropping below 60 vs native 4K+DLAA 80-100fps and Ultra settings.
Yeah, I don't think so. Mind you, the Pro should be running this at like 1800p60, but the optimization is ass.
By what then? The 'magic' you feel? Because we all know all the magic will soon be gone for PS players once they know that someone with a PC could be playing the same game as them.
Nioh definitely looks like a PS3 game. It doesn't look better than Uncharted 2-3, Halo 4, or GTA V.
Eh, at least Nioh 2 looked pretty decent from what I remember. Both on PS5 and PC.
I do. It's just that Nioh looks like shit. I stand by what I said. It looks worse than top-tier PS3 games. I'm also not one of those thinking PS4 games looked better than current ones, so I have no idea why you bring that up.
You're so ignorant. Even these "shitty, unoptimized " benchmarks blow the Pro out of the water.
Benchmarks and graphs be damed. If it plays so much better, then what are people still complaining about?
That it looks kinda crappy considering the hardware requirements.
Because you shouldn't need a 5090 for 4K60 Ultra for a game that looks like a low-tier PS4 title without RT. Nobody complained about the performance profile of Alan Wake 2 at max settings because it has RT and dumps on almost every game out there.
You shouldn't need a 5090 for these graphics. It doesn't mean you cant outperform an almost as sucky PS5 version with PC.
All those later games run at 30fps. Nioh runs at 60fps on PS4. I'll take Nioh 60fps gameplay over those games anyday.
I really like the game but It always looked almost a generation behind to me. I thought MGSV and DMC5 both looked miles better running at 60fps. Bloodborne also looked much better but of course the framerate is garbage. Nioh needed a PS4 Pro just to do 1080p at 60fps. On base PS4 it was 720p at 60fps or 30 fps at 1080p. I never understood why the compromise was needed for a game that looked like that.
It also runs at 720p-900p, so not much of an achievement. The bottom line is, Team Ninja games almost always look a generation behind and a lot of them, especially lately, run horribly.
This is the thing that all these fanboys know but want to gloss over.. and they think that if they tweet about it enough, they'll convince themselves and others that what they are saying is true.
I wouldn't go that far. Don't write it off completely.
That was very obvious. The problem clearly isn't that it doesn't perform much better than the PS5 version. The problem is that you'd expect a game with those visuals to run at 4K60 Ultra on a 3080, not a 5090.
MGSV was a fairly early cross gen PS4 game so yeah I expect more from others. That wasn't the only game either and Nioh 2 came out many years later.
Game is still great. Runs really, really well compared to the PS5 version.
I played the PS5 version for 100+ hours but was always struggling with the combat because of the brutal timing-based parries. Unstable performance made it very difficult for me to get the timing right. So I just played on easy mode.
But on PC it runs super smooth capped at 60 and I'm discovering a whole new way to play the game with the perfect parry. I have a 4070 and I play on 1440p, pretty much everything on ultra, DLSS to balanced. Disabled reflection raytracing.
The combat is so good. Extremely rewarding to pull off the perfect parries. And the vibes in the game are great, it's not a visual masterpiece but the atmosphere is aces. Beautiful music too (by Inon Zur, who also did Fallout and Starfield). Traversal is fun, the glider is cool. The story gets messy super quick but who cares.
Tip: just make your way through the story until you unlock the Longhouse, and then go explore. In the Longhouse you can fully customize your character (just like at the start of the game) and transmog your outfits and gear. Plus you'll get the glider and meet Taka
It is indeed why I laugh at the notion that visuals have "barely improved" from those days. They have improved CONSIDERABLY since the 7th gen.
1440p High preset, all post procession like vignette moton blur ect off, dlss updated to dlss 4 and on balanced, fps uncapped, above 60 in the cities and anywhere between 60 and 100 in the open world.
wtf haha what an innovation. /s
People are laughing at you, but I think it's pretty obvious by now that if a game isn't big in China, then its odds of succeeding on Steam aren't very high.The target pc-audience is too small to be taken seriously. Nobody cares!
Yeah, no shit. They run on systems with 256MB of RAM while Nioh runs on one with 8GB.
Yes, they do. The only thing Nioh has on them is the cleaner resolution. Blow them up to 1080p and they shit on Nioh something awful. Even at its native 720p resolution, Uncharted 3 takes a royal dump on Nioh. Nioh looks like a PS3 game with PS4-era resolution.
In contrast to the hundreds of ps3 games that dont look like that.Yeah, no shit. They run on systems with 256MB of RAM while Nioh runs on one with 8GB.
Yes, they do. The only thing Nioh has on them is the cleaner resolution. Blow them up to 1080p and they shit on Nioh something awful. Even at its native 720p resolution, Uncharted 3 takes a royal dump on Nioh. Nioh looks like a PS3 game with PS4-era resolution.
This is what top-tier PS3 games with PS4-era resolution look like:
Tell me how these don't crap all over PS4 Nioh. They're also 1080p60, not 720p-900p like Nioh.
And that stops Uncharted and God of War from being PS3-era games, how?
Because Nioh was in development hell for years and those games werent, they also run at 30 fps with dips so I dont see your point in how Nioh is technically looks and feels like a ps3 games because it doesnt.
So?
And Nioh runs at 720p-900p with dips on a PS4.
It's technically inferior to games like Uncharted 3 or God of War 3. Besides the resolution, those graphics are PS3-era. Take PS3 games on RPCS3, increase their resolution to 1080p and a lot of them straight-up look better than Nioh, so yes, it's graphically a PS3 game.
