Vestal
Junior Member
I really don't think so. I think he knows the importance and what it means to take a stand like this and more importantly believes in what it means for his people.I don't think he's leaving his people
I really don't think so. I think he knows the importance and what it means to take a stand like this and more importantly believes in what it means for his people.I don't think he's leaving his people
Gun restrictions and regulations is the first step for "slavery".I am pro gun restrictions and regulation. Don't own a single firearm, but have considered purchasing one for the range. But I can tell you that the moment something like that happens here I would be the first in line to pick up a rifle and defend my country.
What you are seeing from these people, is Patriotism and love of country. Regardless of the difference we have or think we have in the US, the majority of us love this country and will defend it to our dying breath.
Gun restrictions and regulations is the first step for "slavery".
Plus, this happens too:
Gun restrictions and regulations is the first step for "slavery".
Plus, this happens too:
if I remember correctly it is cheap mass-produced gun. Not ideal guns and they can break easily if not well maintained but if you want to arm a large population it is great.I read ukraines distributing like 70,000 ak47s how powerful are those guns compared to others?
on the channel i posted these from there is further videos of that tank driving over the car and the events before it that was posted earlier.. not pleasant though so don’t watch if you can’t handle that stuff.
I swear all you do is repost fake info. Not sure if on purpose or stupidity.
Break easily? An AK? The AK-47 and it's variants are some of the most ruggedly reliable weapons that was ever made for it's price point. Those bastards can survive basically anything even if only slightly maintained. They are damn near indestructible by normal gun terms.if I remember correctly it is cheap mass-produced gun. Not ideal guns and they can break easily if not well maintained but if you want to arm a large population it is great.
Break easily? An AK? The AK-47 and it's variants are some of the most ruggedly reliable weapons that was ever made for it's price point. Those bastards can survive basically anything even if only slightly maintained. They are damn near indestructible by normal gun terms.
For example you can bury the damn thing in the ground for a month after beating the fucking piss out of it and it will still operate just fine.
Why do you support Russia?What an embarrassment. That's my home Canada for ya. That'll show em.
Ontario directs LCBO to remove all Russian-made products from shelves
The Ontario government has directed the LCBO to remove all products produced in Russia from store shelves.toronto.ctvnews.ca
I am by no means a gun expert or fan, but even I had to do a double take lolYeah I had a great laugh about that nobody has said something so wrong about a gun before
First: I will say that almost no military force uses the AK-47, they use the AKM (English: Modernized Kalashnikov Automatic Rifle) a nearly identical but slightly upgraded version of the AK-47 that started being manufactured in the 50s. A little nitpicky but whatever.I read ukraines distributing like 70,000 ak47s how powerful are those guns compared to others?
An accord only good to USA and Russia is a joke, thats why you need to consider every nation in the world as possible enemies in the future.The accord was to not attack Ukraine. Not to protect it.
Because what I can see is a true acting of cheating in this accord, plus Russia signed the accord and other members dont give protection to Ukraine against Russia attack is clearly bad faith.this is the budapest referendum :
2. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
Russia broke the accord, not the other nations. Ukraine signed the accord. In no where is it written that they have to protect Ukraine.An accord only good to USA and Russia is a joke, thats why you need to consider every nation in the world as possible enemies in the future.
Because what I can see is a true acting of cheating in this accord, plus Russia signed the accord and other members dont give protection to Ukraine against Russia attack is clearly bad faith.
This accord is like buying a xbox box in ebay and receive a empty box without refund of the money, lol.
Break easily? An AK? The AK-47 and it's variants are some of the most ruggedly reliable weapons that was ever made for it's price point. Those bastards can survive basically anything even if only slightly maintained. They are damn near indestructible by normal gun terms.
For example you can bury the damn thing in the ground for a month after beating the fucking piss out of it and it will still operate just fine.
Break easily? An AK? The AK-47 and it's variants are some of the most ruggedly reliable weapons that was ever made for it's price point. Those bastards can survive basically anything even if only slightly maintained. They are damn near indestructible by normal gun terms.
For example you can bury the damn thing in the ground for a month after beating the fucking piss out of it and it will still operate just fine.
This is the most dishonest answer possible even if 100% true.Russia broke the accord, not the other nations. Ukraine sign the accord. In no where is it written that they have to maintain it.
I meant protect it. I edited my posted after saw my blunder. You answered my posted unedited. Anyway in no way do they have to protect it. Tell me 1 thing that the other nations have broken in this accord. Only Russia broke the accord.This is the most dishonest answer possible even if 100% true.
Anyway, if no one have obligation to maintain the word isnt a accord.
Now, give back Ukraine nukes if no one need to maintain the accord, lol.
I swear all you do is repost fake info. Not sure if on purpose or stupidity.
What the hell is reviewbrah doing in Ukraine?China being backstabbing bastards
Everyone signed the accord as group and for obvious reasons the group need to act against Russia attacks because the accord ceases to exist with any violation and cant exist partially.I meant protect it. I edited my posted after saw my blunder. You answered my posted unedited. Anyway in no way do they have to protect it. Tell me 1 thing that the other nations have broken in this accord. Only Russia broke the accord.
Anonymous left a message :
Anonymous left a message :
Where is it written that they have to act if one break the accord ? You are crazy. And you are still argumenting about an obvious blunder that I made which doesn't make sense. If you do not want to have a rational discussion about this just tell me because I don't want to tire myself answering to irrational comments.Everyone signed the accord as group and for obvious reasons the group need to act against Russia attacks because the accord ceases to exist with any violation and cant exist partially.
The funny part is when you say that the counties who signed the accord have no obligation to mantain the word you only show that Putin is right in consider NATO a true menace to Russia because they lied/cheated Ukrain and are lying when say that NATO is a defensive organization, lol.
Even then that can be mitigated be experience and reasonable semi-auto fire.Its main weakness is probably range
It's true it's corny but whateverWow, I thought I hit my daily cringe quota earlier today with that AnnaLynne McCord Putin mommy video. Now this. I'm sitting at a surplus now.
At least they still are still good at doing some things so I do not care.Are these absolute fucking idiots still around?
I wanted to say something so bad but didn’t think anyone else would know what I was talking about. At first I thought this was fake but I saw the video footage and it indeed seems to just be a lookalike from that angle.What the hell is reviewbrah doing in Ukraine?
Don't listen to me. but maybe rethink the choice of "analysts" who claim a wedge between Russia and China. based on an "abstain" vote that doesn't matter.Sorry dude, but I’m going to listen to actual people with real world experience of both Russia and China, before some random guy on a gaming forum.
Anonymous left a message :
Anonymous left a message :
Anonymous left a message :
Ugh, you gotta be kidding me. I definitely fell for this one as well with those pictures. And here I said earlier how I'd be more skeptical...Just a reminder of how propaganda works. Reuters story on the right: https://www.reuters.com/world/europ...peace-talks-donbass-conflict-zone-2021-04-20/
I read ukraines distributing like 70,000 ak47s how powerful are those guns compared to others?
“AK-47. The very best there is. When you absolutely, positively got to kill every motherfucker in the room, accept no substitutes.”
I loved the one my dad had. It was an amazingly accurate weapon. Too bad my dad sold it before I could buy it from him.“AK-47. The very best there is. When you absolutely, positively got to kill every motherfucker in the room, accept no substitutes.”