Portugeezer
Member
Not if the games are 3-4 years away, which is what I am kind of expecting from many games they'll show.
It's the whole claim that slow HDDs of previous systems will hold next gen systems back. It's the reason why some games are not possible on previous systems. Not to mention the huge difference in CPU power as well.
![]()
The Medium Developer Reveals Why Game is Next-Gen Exclusive
The developer of The Medium, Bloober Team, looks set to deliver a game-changing mechanic in the upcoming title that made it a next-gen game.gamerant.com
In an interview, Wojciech stated, "I can't tell you right now about our most important feature, because we will have to save it for later. But the gameplay mechanic built around those two worlds couldn't be fully realized on current-gen hardware."
MS wanting to release their games on xbox one, pc and XSX still isnt anti-consumer.
It all depends on what their next gen exclusives are like. The argument that I've seen is that people that buy an XSX should have games on it that are not held back by last gen systems. People are buying the XSX to play next gen games not to play current ones at a higher resolution.
Hopefully that makes sense.
Its not very complicated. A company that wants to keep supporting their products even after a new one comes out is the very definition of "pro consumer".
I dont know how else to explain that to you.
But this mentality never really made sense as 99% of games this gen could've been done on PS360 with lower resolution and graphics geometry. It's not like there was such an improvement in physics and AI that games relied heavily on these and last gen could not have handled. Next gen will be a game changer imo. I expect physics to take a big leap (thinking at this guy's fluid simulation demo) but it'll take time before we fully get what next gen brings. I don't think the first year will bring most games to new heights. So supporting this gen for the first year isn't a big deal.It all depends on what their next gen exclusives are like. The argument that I've seen is that people that buy an XSX should have games on it that are not held back by last gen systems. People are buying the XSX to play next gen games not to play current ones at a higher resolution.
Hopefully that makes sense.
I don't see how anyone cauld laud Microsoft for doing so many things right when the reality is that this gen was a dumpster fire for Xbox fans, in particular for the early adopters who bought the original Xbox One for $500, got the weakest specs, a useless Kinect peripheral and seven years of mostly poorly reviewed first party games. You must really love the brand when after such a poor showing you're willing to give MS another shot.
But this mentality never really made sense as 99% of games this gen could've been done on PS360 with lower resolution and graphics geometry. It's not like there was such an improvement in physics and AI that games relied heavily on these and last gen could not have handled. Next gen will be a game changer imo. I expect physics to take a big leap (thinking at this guy's fluid simulation demo) but it'll take time before we fully get what next gen brings. I don't think the first year will bring most games to new heights. So supporting this gen for the first year isn't a big deal.
If they just upped and stopped making games compatible with the x1, they'd still be called "anti consumer" by certain individuals here.
I might very well buy the XSX to go with my PS5 but I'd rather them put 100% of their focus into next generation titlesI dont think you can call supporting old and new anti-consumer. If anything, Its the opposite.
The only people complaining about that are people that dont like MS to begin with.
Its not very complicated. A company that wants to keep supporting their products even after a new one comes out is the very definition of "pro consumer".
I dont know how else to explain that to you.
Not really. With the exception of the TV part, they just merged all of that stuff into services that are more digestible to the average gamer, namely Game Pass and xCloud.They have ditched for good the TV, DRM, no used games, always on disasters.
So is producing games that are built around next gen systems. That's pro consumer as well.
At some point both Xbox and Playstation will drop support for current gen systems. It's the same thing that happens with every new generation.
Isn't MS getting flack because they don't plan on abandoning Xbox One users for the next year or two?
You forgot they’ve been completely dominated in sales even since the “mid” gen refresh.Since the mid gen refresh, MS has gotten the power crown back, both with the XOX over the Pro, and the XSX over PS5. They have ditched for good the TV, DRM, no used games, always on disasters. They have smashed back compate out of the park.
They have increased their first party studios and exclusives.
They have rolled out Game Pass for the masses.
They have an excellent communicator as their public face in Phil.
I'm also pretty sure MS will release the XSX at the same price as PS5, unlike last gen when they were $100 dearer.
So with all this in mind, and if they come off of a successful game showing, has MS done enough to wipe away the demons?
If not, what are the last remaining things they need to address before launch?
Yes, next gen consoles bring significant improvements in the CPU and SSDs and both will allow new stuff not possible on past gens.I think my doubts come from the massive difference in I/O and CPU speed when compared to last gen systems. That's why I believe that some experiences will only be possible on next gen systems.
Just for comparisons sake the I/O systems and CPUs that the PS4 and X1 have are not that ahead of what the 360 and PS3 had. I've even read that the CELL was actually better than the Jaguars that both the X1 and PS4 have.
Both GamePass and XCloud are online services though. It's like complaining you can't watch Netflix shows while being offline...Not really. With the exception of the TV part, they just merged all of that stuff into services that are more digestible to the average gamer, namely Game Pass and xCloud.
My god dude, you cant be serious. The reaching over here is beyond crazy.
Sony cut off support to ps4. They have the right to do that, sure. But that action is also anti-consumer. It means if people bought a ps4 for primarily the sony games, they are all completely fucked and forced to spend another 400-600$ to continue that support. Theres nothing pro-consumer about that regardless of how console generations have worked.
They may have the right to do that, (and MS has done the same thing in the passed) but stop pretending like thats a pro consumer thing, because it isnt and never has been. It doesnt matter which way you spin it.
Sony are being called anti consumer for abandoning the PS4 while Microsoft is being called anti consumer for not putting all their focus on the XSX.
My post is saying IF they do have a good showing, will they have then done enough?
It's not like making players go online to play physical copies of their games was the goal Microsoft had when they unveiled XBO, it was a side effect. The goal was to gain more control over the degree to which players actually "owned" their games, and how, where and when they could buy and play them. Game Pass and xCloud are a more gentle, roundabout way of achieving that exact same goal.Both GamePass and XCloud are online services though. It's like complaining you can't watch Netflix shows while being offline...
Yes, next gen consoles bring significant improvements in the CPU and SSDs and both will allow new stuff not possible on past gens.
Whether or not people want to buy their products in mass numbers again is a different issue, but...
Personally, it was all good as of the One X. They've had years of great services, initiatives, and hardware, and I've really enjoyed them again.
This is from someone who almost was on a Jihad against the original Xbox One.
But you can't expect the first year of next gen to spot games that rely on mechanics that are impossible to replicate past gens. If so, from a first party perspective, nothing prevents you from making two versions if necessary. There's nothing anti consumer in this. Making people buy a console and stop supporting it the same year is anti consumer. Granted third parties will still support PS4 and X1 for some time. A year later they'll jump on the next gen craze np.Pretty much. At some point making games on all platforms will just hinder next gen systems. It's where I see the argument that cross gen support is anti consumer for those that buy next gen systems.
I felt they redeemed themselves with the release of the Xbox One X. Everything else you mention was just icing on the cake. Sony had their time to build up their studios during the PS3/360 Gen. I think Xbox has deserved that same time to allow their new studios to develop as well.Since the mid gen refresh, MS has gotten the power crown back, both with the XOX over the Pro, and the XSX over PS5. They have ditched for good the TV, DRM, no used games, always on disasters. They have smashed back compate out of the park.
They have increased their first party studios and exclusives.
They have rolled out Game Pass for the masses.
They have an excellent communicator as their public face in Phil.
I'm also pretty sure MS will release the XSX at the same price as PS5, unlike last gen when they were $100 dearer.
So with all this in mind, and if they come off of a successful game showing, has MS done enough to wipe away the demons?
If not, what are the last remaining things they need to address before launch?
AAA games are rarely bad. Especially when the teams involved have the pedigree to create AAA games.Nope. They need to deliver those high quality games first. I've seen way to many interesting looking games turn out to be mediocre after a good showing.
I remember being really excited for No Man's Sky when it was first shown. We all know what happened with that game.
....but sure you are over the moon for all of the games sony showed.Nope. They need to deliver those high quality games first. I've seen way to many interesting looking games turn out to be mediocre after a good showing.
I remember being really excited for No Man's Sky when it was first shown. We all know what happened with that game.
But you can't expect the first year of next gen to spot games that rely on mechanics that are impossible to replicate past gens. If so, from a first party perspective, nothing prevents you from making two versions if necessary. There's nothing anti consumer in this. Making people buy a console and stop supporting it the same year is anti consumer. Granted third parties will still support PS4 and X1 for some time. A year later they'll jump on the next gen craze np.
....but sure you are over the moon for all of the games sony showed.
AAA games are rarely bad. Especially when the teams involved have the pedigree to create AAA games.
We agree on that at some point they need to drop the previous gens. I just didn't think the idea that supporting both gens for the first year is anti consumer. I don't think supporting exclusively a new gen is anti consumer either. Both companies have a different mindset and they do what's best for them. But if you're gonna drop support for one, at least make sure the new buyers are aware of it. I think Sony kinda publicly said so if I'm not mistaken.Doesn't mean that it's impossible to release games that take advantage of next gen hardware in the first year. I've seen plenty of games at launch that were not possible on previous gen systems. I do agree that nobody should expect games that are only possible on next gen for the first couple of years.
I agree that dropping support for current gen systems is anti consumer but I also agree that letting current gen hold next gen game design back is also anti consumer. Like you said at some point current gen will be dropped in favor of next gen. Sony is just doing that earlier than Microsoft but at some point Microsoft will make the same decision.
This isn't anything new since it happens with each generation of consoles.
Why does Xbox One even matter?
Next gen is a new start.
We agree on that at some point they need to drop the previous gens. I just didn't think the idea that supporting both gens for the first year is anti consumer. I don't think supporting exclusively a new gen is anti consumer either. Both companies have a different mindset and they do what's best for them. But if you're gonna drop support for one, at least make sure the new buyers are aware of it. I think Sony kinda publicly said so if I'm not mistaken.