adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Two things can be true.
Exactly.
Like how a large amount of viewership on something doesn't mean it was acclaimed.
Two things can be true.
You should know this more than anybody.Exactly.
Like how a large amount of viewership on something doesn't mean it was acclaimed.
Yet in most of the individual games threads, people are hyped about them.The bubbles didn't seem to love what was shown either
I am 55 thousand of those votes. I went to democracy school for democrats.Wasn’t just GAF that voted the show poorly btw
![]()
so you somehow know the reasons why the 80,000 people voted the way they did?I think your inability to understand expectation vs. result is causing the issue here.
A state of play can be "decently good", but if everyone expects every single sony first party studio to announce a new game or show new footage of their games, while also expecting a Bloodborne remaster which is nothing more than a meme at this point, then you can have a result that shows lower grades *despite* the game showcase being quality in aggregate.
Similarly, if nobody expects anything (MS Direct), but gets a surprise like Ninja Gaiden, it can poll highly. And yet The Sony showcase can still show a better lineup of titles. So yes, the polls are largely meaningless.
Oh I don't mind if people are excited about games they saw even if someone loved every single game they sawYet in most of the individual games threads, people are hyped about them.
Odd phenomenon.
According to this thread, people think it wasn't liked without any evidence.We have a consensus outside of just numbers?
Which bubbles? Gaf?The bubbles didn't seem to love what was shown either
where do you see this? 99% of the threads see on GAF are AAA relatedWhat's funny is all the people.on here giving it an 'F' when this SoP gave them nothing but AA and indie, exactly what people on here seem to demand all the time.
so you somehow know the reasons why the 80,000 people voted the way they did?
gamers telling other gamers that they're actually not disappointed but in reality they're simply confused is wild
if you weren't so blinded by weird corporate cuckery you'd see how silly you look
I don't know what people demand in general outside of great games but the funny things about these polls here and Keighlys are people saying only PS haters are voting and PS lovers just decided to not vote?Which bubbles? Gaf?
What's funny is all the people.on here giving it an 'F' when this SoP gave them nothing but AA and indie, exactly what people on here seem to demand all the time.
disagreeing with a poll because you don't like the results is literally the opposite of being a realistIt has nothing to do with being blinded. It's just being a realist.
That's not what I am saying.Oh I don't mind if people are excited about games they saw even if someone loved every single game they saw
Flip side why do people find it so hard to believe some were not excited about what they saw?
Why are people taking it so personally that many did not like the show?
I don't know what people demand in general outside of great games but the funny things about these polls here and Keighlys are people saying only PS haters are voting and PS lovers just decided to not vote?
do the math dude
28.8 + 36.2 = 65
the fact it can swing both ways is the bad part
are you serious? the individual threads are obviously drawing people who are interested in the gameThat's not what I am saying.
I am noticing that supposedly the majority called in an F, yet the majority of users in the most of the individual games threads are raving about them.
It strikes me as odd. In what universe are we disappointed seeing a new Onimusha & Shinobi & Housemarque announcement as F tier, but a NG4 one as A tier.
I just think one has much higher expectations where the other is pretty much in the gutter.
Didn't the majority on here accurately predict Concord's failure? Didn't the game trailers have millions of views, just for the game to peak at 697 on Steam? Even then you have the deniers that those are just "PC numbers" just for Sony to pull the plug.This past week has shown us that GAF is extremely out of touch and many of its narratives are completely divorced from reality.
I wouldn't trust polls on Twitter (I'm never calling it X) as quite alot of people left the platform and went to better/less toxic social media platforms like Bluesky, Threads etc... Most users i have enchountered on Twitter these days are noting but bot created accounts.Wasn’t just GAF that voted the show poorly btw
![]()
I wouldn't trust polls on Twitter (I'm never calling it X) as quite alot of people left the platform and went to better/less toxic social media platforms like Bluesky, Threads etc... Most users i have enchountered on Twitter these days are noting but bot created accounts.
In what universe are we disappointed seeing a new Onimusha & Shinobi & Housemarque announcement as F tier, but a NG4 one as A tier.
And 99% of people in those AAA related threads are whining about how devs are too focused on AAA.where do you see this? 99% of the threads see on GAF are AAA related
I remember people asking for more indie games in the early 2010s
this narrative seems tired and old. vast majority of hype threads I see, be it Sony, MS or Nintendo, are for AAA titles
Polls on Gaf should be disregarded completely. Gaf is completely out of touch with reality 9/10 times.I don't know what people demand in general outside of great games but the funny things about these polls here and Keighlys are people saying only PS haters are voting and PS lovers just decided to not vote?
Good show, good numbers, what's wrong?
Sony deserve their success.
disagreeing with a poll because you don't like the results is literally the opposite of being a realist
Even the bots hated that awful SoP.I wouldn't trust polls on Twitter (I'm never calling it X) as quite alot of people left the platform and went to better/less toxic social media platforms like Bluesky, Threads etc... Most users i have enchountered on Twitter these days are noting but bot created accounts.
you're using old data bro![]()
On NeoGAFs poll 51.9% of people thought it was a C or above.
On Geoffs poll 64.1% of people though it was a C or above.
In neither poll everybody hated it.
And that's just a fact.
So disregard polls and just decide how others feel because they want?And 99% of people in those AAA related threads are whining about how devs are too focused on AAA.
Polls on Gaf should be disregarded completely. Gaf is completely out of touch with reality 9/10 times.
As for polls in general, most people don't care about gaming polls at all.
And 99% of people in those AAA related threads are whining about how devs are too focused on AAA.
Polls on Gaf should be disregarded completely. Gaf is completely out of touch with reality 9/10 times.
As for polls in general, most people don't care about gaming polls at all.
Some advanced GAFers believe Steam Deck is selling like hot cakes.Wasn’t just GAF that voted the show poorly btw
![]()
C is average. D is below average and F is failing in curriculum.you're using old data bro
updated pic:
![]()
35% gave it an A or B
65% gave it a C or D
D is the average if you were to average it via other methods such as mode (D is the highest reported rating)
and this is just fact
Does the GAF poll of the Microsoft conference mean that they had a better showing of games than the Sony state of Play just because it has a higher score?
Don't listen to people in gaming threads
Don't listen to people in GAF's polls
Don't listen to people on twitter polls
Got it, Boss.![]()
sorry for my confusing wording, I meant if we even deviate from relying on 'mean average' and look at mode, you get DC is average. D is below average and F is failing in curriculum.
90% of voters don't even participate in discussions on here. Only use useful idiots, lol.For GAF's participating demographic, yes.
Everyone called out Concord as a failure from day one, you don't have to be Nostradamus to see that game was going to fail hard. That's not an achievement especially when you consider a broken clock is right once a day.Didn't the majority on here accurately predict Concord's failure? Didn't the game trailers have millions of views, just for the game to peak at 697 on Steam? Even then you have the deniers that those are just "PC numbers" just for Sony to pull the plug.
How about Playstation absolutely dominating the console-market and breaking record after record?So disregard polls and just decide how others feel because they want?
Sorry but polls tell me more than feelings
Oh, you can listen to them if you want.Don't listen to people in gaming threads
Don't listen to people in GAF's polls
Don't listen to people on twitter polls
Got it, Boss.![]()
There was literally nobody on Gaf that thought Concord wouldn't flop.Didn't the majority on here accurately predict Concord's failure? Didn't the game trailers have millions of views, just for the game to peak at 697 on Steam? Even then you have the deniers that those are just "PC numbers" just for Sony to pull the plug.
90% of voters don't even participate in discussions on here. Only use useful idiots, lol.
idk I haven't watched the MS conferenceYou clearly know NOTHING about polling, because polls can be skewed entirely due to a number of different factors.
Sinceadamsapple is too afraid of answering a basic question, maybe you will.
Does the GAF poll of the Microsoft conference mean that they had a better showing of games than the Sony state of Play just because it has a higher score?
Is Ninja Gaiden 4, Doom, Expedition 33, and South of Midnight a better showcase of games than Saros, Tides of Annihilation, Shinobi, Onimusha, Metal Gear Solid 3, Sonic Racing, Hell is Us, Lost Soul Aside, Lies of P Overture, MindsEye, Monster Hunter Wilds, The Mignight Walk, Directive 8020, etc?
Oh yes sales figures means everyone is happy with the first party gamesHow about Playstation absolutely dominating the console-market and breaking record after record?
Oh, you can listen to them if you want.
But then you keep scratching your head everytime reality contradicts your fantasies.
Still doesn't answer why people are taking it so personally that a majority voted the show below averageThat's not what I am saying.
I am noticing that supposedly the majority called it an F, yet the majority of users in the most of the individual games threads are raving about them.
It strikes me as odd. In what universe are we disappointed seeing a new Onimusha & Shinobi & Housemarque announcement as F tier, but a NG4 one as A tier.
I just think one has much higher expectations where the other is pretty much in the gutter.
Bluesky is the largest echochamber on the internet. Any poll on there is totally useless.I wouldn't trust polls on Twitter (I'm never calling it X) as quite alot of people left the platform and went to better/less toxic social media platforms like Bluesky, Threads etc... Most users i have enchountered on Twitter these days are noting but bot created accounts.
I'm not taking it personally. Just logically it doesn't make any sense with a lot of the games shown. I rated it a C+ FWIW, because fuck them every time there is no Bloodborne.Still doesn't answer why people are taking it so personally that a majority voted the show below average