The Librarian
Banned
I'm sorry to disappoint you.OuterWorldVoice said:
Dammit Dax! I coulda used this against you!!!
I'm sorry to disappoint you.OuterWorldVoice said:
Dammit Dax! I coulda used this against you!!!
I can't read the Star Trek books because even though I can make-out the voices for each character in my head, it just doesn't seem like them. I don't know, it's hard to explain.grandjedi6 said:I can't read the Star Trek books. So many of them are awful and none of them are canon. There's no real incentive to pick them up at all, especially when I could just pick up an actually good book instead.
Fragamemnon said:Sisko's so great because he's actually comes across as a person and not some sort of Starfleet action figure almost all of the time. The only other character in Trek that, for me, always came across as so internally consistent and believable was Bones.
A favorite Sisko moment at the end of In the Pale Moonlight:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-YyL7X4CWw
Cheebs said:I wouldn't say Bones was the only character that felt like a real person on TOS. Obviously all of the minor characters never felt like real persons. And Spock was well, Spock. Kirk in certain instances came across as a flawed regular human being.
Kirk was vunerable and showed a real side of a person with flaws despite in TOS and most of the films being a super hero. However it was only when under the direction of Nick Meyes sadly. But in his two movies he did show a very very vulnerable Kirk who could connect with you as a person. In Khan he had Kirk being extremely fearful of growing old and death and in Undiscovered Country he showed a Kirk who had to fight his inner demons of racism (specieism?).
Meyes also brilliantly used the super hero aspect of Kirk to turn it into a flaw in Khan by showing him as someone who was so cocky and self-assured he never imagined he'd ever have to sacrifice anything and the idea of losing would destroy him (and he did with Spock at the end).
So Kirk WAS able to be shown as a flawed normal human, but only under Meyes. Well and City on the Edge of Forever.
Kirk was a character who was a real person who could be connected with and was filled with flaws and emotional problems, but almost none of the writers/directors in Trek took advantage of it. It was easier to play up Super Kirk.
Bail out and skip to season 4, but don't watch "Storm Front" parts 1 and 2, or "These are the Voyages..."Karakand said:So I am on season 3 of ENT now... the Xindi thing and the Delphic Expanse is so bleh.
Karakand said:So I am on season 3 of ENT now... the Xindi thing and the Delphic Expanse is so bleh.
Karakand said:So I am on season 3 of ENT now... the Xindi thing and the Delphic Expanse is so bleh.
True, 3 does play into it.DrForester said:If Kirk had been able to save his son from the Klingons, like Sisko did, his hatred of the Klingons wouldn't have been as big and it would have made the issues in Undiscovered country alot easier.
It's nice that there is actually an arc in season 3... it's just introduced and subsequently conducted terribly.DrForester said:I had no rel issues with season 3 and foudn it enoyable and a vast improvement over season 1 and 2.
Dax01 said:Does anyone know what the font Star Trek uses is called?
DrEvil said:Wait for Coto to take over in S4
No, I'm just wondering what it's called.besada said:It's been called Star Trek BT since the eighties. No idea what they based the original font off of.
Do you need Star Trek fonts?
Cheebs said:I wouldn't say Bones was the only character that felt like a real person on TOS. Obviously all of the minor characters never felt like real persons. And Spock was well, Spock. Kirk in certain instances came across as a flawed regular human being.
Kirk was vunerable and showed a real side of a person with flaws despite in TOS and most of the films being a super hero. However it was only when under the direction of Nick Meyes sadly. But in his two movies he did show a very very vulnerable Kirk who could connect with you as a person. In Khan he had Kirk being extremely fearful of growing old and death and in Undiscovered Country he showed a Kirk who had to fight his inner demons of racism (specieism?).
Meyes also brilliantly used the super hero aspect of Kirk to turn it into a flaw in Khan by showing him as someone who was so cocky and self-assured he never imagined he'd ever have to sacrifice anything and the idea of losing would destroy him (and he did with Spock at the end).
So Kirk WAS able to be shown as a flawed normal human, but only under Meyes. Well and City on the Edge of Forever.
Kirk was a character who was a real person who could be connected with and was filled with flaws and emotional problems, but almost none of the writers/directors in Trek took advantage of it. It was easier to play up Super Kirk.
Mama Robotnik said:Great thread!
A treat I found on TrekBBS, some newly unearthed promotional pictures that have been lost over the years:
http://trekcore.com/specials/thumbnails.php?album=32
Picard as Dixon Hill looks no-nonsense. And its nice to see behind-the-scenes on the infamous Insurrection-Joystick moment.
Mama Robotnik said:I clearly need to do my background reading. I think I've head about Phase 2, is it a planned sequel to TOS that never took off for some reason? I remember the (awesome) animated series, is it related to that?
This site is awesome. I found the Star Trek font for download.Mama Robotnik said:Great thread!
A treat I found on TrekBBS, some newly unearthed promotional pictures that have been lost over the years:
http://trekcore.com/specials/thumbnails.php?album=32
Picard as Dixon Hill looks no-nonsense. And its nice to see behind-the-scenes on the infamous Insurrection-Joystick moment.
Beneath his latex Klingon forehead, Michael rolled his eyes. "You want me to kick his ass, Wil?"
Reasonably good?besada said:I have now finished watching Season 1 of DS9.
It was okay. Duet was reasonably good, as were a handful of other episodes. But there was a bunch of stupid being flung around, too. Some of it's just regular Star Trek stupid (everyone speaks English, including the Klingons in their own records), but there was some DS9-specific stupid, too.
And is it me, or does DS9 have some of the goofiest outfits of the entire Trek universe? Whoever picked out Jake's clothes should be beaten with a rake. Star Trek already ruined one fifteen year old's life, did they have to destroy another one? You know he got his ass beat for those outfits.
Seeing Nurse Ratched was a pip.
I liked the episode with Odo and Troi. Odo is still my favorite character, and I still want Bashir to be raped by Hortas.
On to Season Two.
Dax01 said:Reasonably good?
Yeah. WillDrForester said:Phase 2's pilot was re-scripted to become the first movie and few scripts were later used for a few episode of Next Generation (even Troi and Rikers "lost love" relationship was taken from Phase 2), but no link to the Animated Series I don't think.
besada said:And is it me, or does DS9 have some of the goofiest outfits of the entire Trek universe? Whoever picked out Jake's clothes should be beaten with a rake. Star Trek already ruined one fifteen year old's life, did they have to destroy another one? You know he got his ass beat for those outfits.
besada said:It was okay. Duet was reasonably good...
People always hold up Duet as one of Trek's best episodes ever, but I remember reading in one of Leonard Nimoy's books about how in the 70's or 80's he directed a stage play concerning a major Nazi war criminal on trial for the deaths of thousands. In the end, it turned out the Nazibesada said:Yep. I've seen the plot elsewhere, it was predictably handled, and Kira's kind of a ham. Other than that it was good.
beelzebozo said:have you watched "the wire" yet?
p.s. i never liked the trill stuff much either.
Lucky Forward said:Does anyone know what that play was called?
Thanks, I'd been trying to think of that for a while. Now that I can google Duet and Man in the Glass Booth, I see that the connection is well known, even wikipedia has it.besada said:The Man in the Glass Booth, which has been a play, a novel, and a movie. I've read the novel and seen the movie. It's pretty much a direct lift of the plot, and while it was very good for an episode of Star Trek, I couldn't help comparing the acting from the film.
I've also read a short science-fiction story somewhere that similarly appropriated the plot, but I can't for the life of me remember what it was.
Really? I thought they handled them pretty differently. With the Trill, the symbiont and host merge to form one new personality. With the goa'uld the symbiote and host share one body but retain unique minds, though the symbiote can access any information and take control of the body at will.besada said:Also, most of the Trill/Host stuff is spoiled for me by watching years of Stargate with the same sort of plots.
JoshuaJSlone said:Really? I thought they handled them pretty differently. With the Trill, the symbiont and host merge to form one new personality. With the goa'uld the symbiote and host share one body but retain unique minds, though the symbiote can access any information and take control of the body at will.
Ehhh, they're still separate, they just do it in a peacefully coexistant way.besada said:But you have roughly the same situation with the Tokra, where they blend,
Ahh. That, yeah.but mostly I was talking about the plot device of removed symbionts and the race to reimplant them.
MMaRsu said:Sorry to hate but Voyager > all.
There I said it.
besada said:15 episodes away. Watching one of the Ferengi episodes now.