I personally don't really care about the user review for Titanfall. Why this is even becoming an issue just because this is Titanfall is pretty hilarious to say the least. The score is going up already so you can already see things starting to balance out.
Do you really care if the user score isn't above 8/10? I actually would give this game an 8 at max.
No, I don't care what the average score is. Many of my favourite games ever haven't scored well, and I have no problem with people not agreeing with my views. I do however think that people shouldn't be attempting to alter the game's score for motives other than how good they actually believe it is. If the game is a 7/10 in the eyes of those that play it, then that rating would be fine. However, the majority (all?) of the reviews scoring it a 0, do not actually believe that the game is actually a 0 in terms of how good the product is. When people have commented on this, you've been replying to them with essentially what reads as "shut up and stop whining, it's all fair game", and this is why I'm responding to you, as I don't believe the scores of 10 should be seen in the same way as the scores of 0, and I DEFINITELY don't think your comment of "well instead of complaining you could be on there placing 10's to help balance the situation" is helpful in the slightest.
You say you'd give the game an 8 max? Great, then I would expect you to place a user review of 8 (or maybe 7). What I wouldn't expect you to do is give it a score of 0.. but going by your responses so far in this thread, I'm not entirely convinced you wouldn't.
Lastly on the idea of people scoring it a 10. My brother is a huge Street Fighter 4 fan, he played all iterations of it at a rather high level, it's one of his favourite games ever. When Killer Instinct hit on the X1 he started playing that, and after the first week or so he was convinced that it was both better than Street Fighter 4, and his new favourite 2D fighter ever. If he were to have posted a user review at that moment, I have absolutely zero doubts that he would have given it a 10. Over time his opinion on it has changed somewhat due to things he's discovered whilst playing it, and how the game has developed over time. I don't believe he any longer believe it to be the best fighter ever, but I'd imagine today he'd probably give it about an 8 or something. The point is the scores of 10, aren't necessarily from people who don't believe that is the correct score for the game. The scores of 0 are almost exclusively that.
Are we clear on this now?
EDIT: I'm going to be away for the next few hours. If you have a reponse that warrants a reply, I'll get back to you once I return.
