Implying that HBOs Game of Thrones is some sort of higher class art sound super weird.
This is some DaVinci-level shit right here.
Implying that HBOs Game of Thrones is some sort of higher class art sound super weird.
It's referring to the fact that LOTR and GOT have the "prestige" factor working for them as they both come from critically referred works of fiction, and both adaptions have swept award shows because of how well-executed they were. They weren't just great fantasy adaptions, they were a great trilogy/TV show period. They're saying Warcraft isn't that.
Although Warcraft comes from a critically-revered series, the games are beloved widely for their gameplay, not their storytelling or plot.
Basically I take it to mean Warcraft is a "Popcorn Movie" or whatever the term is and was never mean to be seen as a tour de force.
if you want to see bad CGI, maybe you should look at RDJ in the Iron Man suit in Civil War with the helmet down. THAT was bad. never mind what you showed wasn't even CGI.
Idk, I don't consider Game of Thrones to be a "tour de force" or a "great adaptation" either. It's a passably entertaining pulp fantasy series with tits and blood. So if you're saying that Warcraft is worse than that, it sounds pretty bad!
Well personally I don't how the movie is since I haven't seen it but I understand what the people are trying to say when they say "they liked it but..." But for what things sound like it probably is worse than Game of Thrones, but sounds probably still watchable and maybe even enjoyable.Idk, I don't consider Game of Thrones to be a "tour de force" or a "great adaptation" either. It's a passably entertaining pulp fantasy series with tits and blood. So if you're saying that Warcraft is worse than that, it sounds pretty bad!
Watched it yesterday.
Warcraft was my game to go when I was young. I am 26 now.
Bought Warcraft 3 and Frozen Throne on release. Play them to this day still with some friends sometimes. And of course I played Warcraft + 2 and the expansions before WC3 even (even though I didn't really play it for the story back then)
Played World of Warcraft (since NA beta and then EU release) including Burning Crusade and I came back for every free trial (about 40 days play time overall).
Consumed the lore here and there like a champ just to understand the whole thing.
I wanted this movie for years back then when WoW was still fresh and now I watched it with a friend of mine with whom I played together all these years.
We are damn disappointed, because this movie lacks structure, pacing, tid bits for fans are missing, it looks kinda cheap even though it looks expensive (does that make sense?). I love how the world looks in that real life look, but everything else was just bad and I am a Warcraft fan.
Nice to hear these kinds of opinions, whatever they may be, hopefully they keep coming to help me wait for June.
In for my bois Durotan and Orgrim
I can't wait for the Half in the Bag episode of this.
I can't wait for the Half in the Bag episode of this.
The Honest Trailer is going to be brutal.
Idk, I don't consider Game of Thrones to be a "tour de force" or a "great adaptation" either. It's a passably entertaining pulp fantasy series with tits and blood. So if you're saying that Warcraft is worse than that, it sounds pretty bad!
well f*ck the critics.. i belive in these http://imgur.com/Y95qpkl
Okay guys, here's my spoiler free review for Warcraft:
My history with Warcraft is not ultra-deep, but I played Wc3 and WoW, so you can say I am more than casually involved, but not with the backstory which is told in this movie.
The movie throws you right in the middle of quite a cast of characters that you still need time to get to know, but that only happens over time. You can tell this story would have required more time to develop, but we have only about two hours of runtime, and the script kinda rushes through all those events required to understand all motivations and connections. Duncan Jones does a great job in telling a story that dense in such a short amount of time. But here is also the problem: The film has barely enough time for "character moments", for breathing in and characters becoming more than "the wizard" and "the king" etc. It fails in that department - just a little.
We still do get a beautiful movie with "engaging enough" characters, with the Orcs being on the plus side, which was also necessary, since those CGI-only creatures need all the depth they can get. They don't have the human actor bonus of the other side. The Orcs are really well done with incredible amount of detail, and so is the detail level on the alliance side with the swords, shields and armors. The magic CGI looks a bit overdone, but it is over-the-top Blizzard magic we are talking about here, so it is faithful to the games, despite it is not working as well in a movie. Maybe people are just feeling overfed with CGI at this point and less would have been more.
So, now I have touched mainly the aspects of pacing and looks, but who is this movie for? Well, it is definitely for the fans. You can tell Jones did his best effort to deliver an experience as true to the games as possible while not losing the casual audience. Speaking of those: People not familiar with the matter may fall into one of the possible traps:
- Expecting a popcorn-action flick, they might be disappointed with the amount of character moments and exposition, action isn't this movie's only purpose. If you expect Michael Bay's Warcraft, you will be disappointed.
- Expecting a somewhat leveled approach to fantasy, people may be blown away by crazy high-fantasy concepts like incredibly powerful mages, lifesucking evil magic, world-crossing portals and much much more. Anyone expecting a more grounded fantasy world like Lord of the Rings may "switch off" due to CG and craziness overload. I think this is the POV where most negative professional reviews are coming from.
Overall I enjoyed my time at the movies and I don't have the feeling of having wasted time or money. It's worth seeing in the theater.
8 out of 10 from me. Anyone giving this 5 or lower, or even comparing it to motherfucking Battlefield Earth, is just an idiot screaming for attention.
Okay guys, here's my spoiler free review for Warcraft:
My history with Warcraft is not ultra-deep, but I played Wc3 and WoW, so you can say I am more than casually involved, but not with the backstory which is told in this movie.
The movie throws you right in the middle of quite a cast of characters that you still need time to get to know, but that only happens over time. You can tell this story would have required more time to develop, but we have only about two hours of runtime, and the script kinda rushes through all those events required to understand all motivations and connections. Duncan Jones does a great job in telling a story that dense in such a short amount of time. But here is also the problem: The film has barely enough time for "character moments", for breathing in and characters becoming more than "the wizard" and "the king" etc. It fails in that department - just a little.
We still do get a beautiful movie with "engaging enough" characters, with the Orcs being on the plus side, which was also necessary, since those CGI-only creatures need all the depth they can get. They don't have the human actor bonus of the other side. The Orcs are really well done with incredible amount of detail, and so is the detail level on the alliance side with the swords, shields and armors. The magic CGI looks a bit overdone, but it is over-the-top Blizzard magic we are talking about here, so it is faithful to the games, despite it is not working as well in a movie. Maybe people are just feeling overfed with CGI at this point and less would have been more.
So, now I have touched mainly the aspects of pacing and looks, but who is this movie for? Well, it is definitely for the fans. You can tell Jones did his best effort to deliver an experience as true to the games as possible while not losing the casual audience. Speaking of those: People not familiar with the matter may fall into one of the possible traps:
- Expecting a popcorn-action flick, they might be disappointed with the amount of character moments and exposition, action isn't this movie's only purpose. If you expect Michael Bay's Warcraft, you will be disappointed.
- Expecting a somewhat leveled approach to fantasy, people may be blown away by crazy high-fantasy concepts like incredibly powerful mages, lifesucking evil magic, world-crossing portals and much much more. Anyone expecting a more grounded fantasy world like Lord of the Rings may "switch off" due to CG and craziness overload. I think this is the POV where most negative professional reviews are coming from.
Overall I enjoyed my time at the movies and I don't have the feeling of having wasted time or money. It's worth seeing in the theater.
8 out of 10 from me. Anyone giving this 5 or lower, or even comparing it to motherfucking Battlefield Earth, is just an idiot screaming for attention.
8 out of 10 from me. Anyone giving this 5 or lower, or even comparing it to motherfucking Battlefield Earth, is just an idiot screaming for attention.
I'm just upset about that kind of clickbait journalism. The movie is undeserving of lower-than-average scores.Really liked your post until this part. Come on, man.
Alright, I've seen it last night. Very mild spoilers in my post I guess, and I'll try to tag them.
First of all, I'm a huge Warcraft fan. I've been playing the strategy games since I was a kid, and my WoW subscription is still running since day one, with the ten year anniversary thank you statue proudly displayed in my house.
The movie was a mess. There's some very high points, like the Orcs, some of the cast (Garona, Khadgar and Durotan) or the insane attention to details, but also some very low points, like some of the CG and some of the acting. Lothar is bad, and Llane has zero charisma, which is weird for a King. Places like Stormwind are very faithful to the game, but also feel very fake. It's almost like if it was TOO faithful in a weird way. It's cool that they are riding gryphons,That's just fan service, and it stands out weirdly. Fans of the games will love the easter eggs (extra points to those of you able to spotbut I didn't need them to land EXACTLY at the gryphon master location.), but sometimes it feels like too much. There's too many ideas in that movie, and they never have te time to really expand on them. I loved the shot of Westfall in the trailers,the summoning stoneIt's just there as fan service "hey guys, remember that place in the game? cool, back to the movie now". Locations are name-dropped like candy and it never pays off.but that's literally all of Westfall that's in the movie. There's not a single second more.
It was a weird thing. I'm definitely disappointed, I have no intention of seeing it again, but also I'm glad I saw it, and I wouldn't mind a sequel. They're definitely setting things up for one, and I fear that's yet another part of the movie that's never going to pay off.
It really feels like it's close to being a great movie, but like a house of cards, it's the little things that make everything fall apart.
I'm just upset about that kind of clickbait journalism. The movie is undeserving of lower-than-average scores.
That's not how clickbait works. You don't know the score when you click on the article on the website. You know what would be clickbait?
"You won't believe what we thought of Warcraft!"
That would be clickbait, since it wants you to click on the article without actually telling you what the article entails. These headlines are the exact opposite of clickbait, since they accurately tell you what the editor though of the movie, then providing further reasoning after deciding you want to know more.
They disagree with you. Not because they figure "Yeah! That will bring way more clicks (which is in and on itself a deeply flawed premise) but simply because they have a different opinion. An opinion that is just as valid as yours- and they spend many words to explain why they came to that conclusion.
Who picks the line on the RottenTomatoes site?
Because his review is headlined with "Imagine Battlefield Earth without the verve, or the unintentional comedy." on RT and it's definitely clickbait.
The summary of the review on The Wrap als reads as follows "Imagine “Battlefield Earth” without the verve and you get this sludgy, tedious fantasy adventure, a fun-starved dud that’s not even unintentionally hilarious"
And even just putting it in your review is just bait, because people will talk about it when they read it and tell friends and co-workers that "one review even compared it to Battlefield Earth and it was worse!".
None of that is what clickbait means and none of that shows that it's a bad review or critique. Clickbait doesn't mean: "Something that makes you want to read an article." That's literally what every single headline/summary is supposed do. The term just gets thrown around by everyone whenever someone makes a statement they disagree with, depriving it of any and all meaning it once had.
If he thinks it's a worse version of Battlefield Earth and then provides reasoning for why he thinks that, it's just as valid as someone in this thread saying it's a great movie for fans.
Oxford Dictionary said:clickbait
content whose main purpose is to attract attention and encourage visitors to click on a link to a particular web page
Hmmm, just got back from the screening. It's a really weird one this. It's definitely not getting bad reviews because it's too nerdy, there is something badly wrong here.
Basically, most of the problems come down to structure and script. So it's not that it's a terrible film because of a lack of artistry, more that the story has been cut to the bone to fit into two hours, and a lot of really important character building connective story tissue has been left out as a result. I watched them film a lot of stuff that's not in the finished movie too, so I suspect there's probably a three hour version of this film that's a lot better.
Essentially, the film boils down to two pairs of friends, Durotan and Orgrim on the Orc side, and Llane and Lothar on the the Humans side. Except, the film never explains or properly introduces these relationships or their backstory properly, instead thrusting the audience straight into the story, meaning you never care what happens to the various characters, as if you don't know the lore, you don't know who they are. There are twists that should be epic moments, but instead are just met with shrugs, because that character groundwork just isn't in the movie.
For example, it's never explained that there are lots of different orc clans, and that the different clans are in competition with each other, or who the leaders of each clan are, or why the orc homeworld is dying, or anything really, just assuming that the audience will either know or work out the various factions themselves. Which is difficult when a lot of the orcs look quite samey. The first 40 minutes are incredibly breathless too, like somebody reading off a list of random plot beats, with no scenes seemingly lasting more than about 30 seconds. It's really head spinning.
Effects wise, the magic works really well, and the orcs work really well UNLESS there are humans or any live action elements in the frame, at which point the whole illusion completely falls apart. I almost wish the whole thing had been CG really. It almost may as well have been. It also lacks any sort of satisfying conclusion.
It's a shame, because there's almost a good film here, but it's just a bit buried in the editing I think. But that's not really going to help this film's chances at the box office. Essentially, if you're super into the lore then there are few surprises, and if you're not, then the whole thing must be a little incomprehensible.
EDIT: And having just read up on it to refresh my memory, it's ironically not even that faithful to the lore either, except in the broadest of strokes.
I'm just upset about that kind of clickbait journalism. The movie is undeserving of lower-than-average scores.
I'm willing to bet that a 5 or 8 means something different to every person in this thread.
Really liked your post until this part. Come on, man.
Its okay, first come denial and then acceptance.It's prety obvious the Battlefield Earth name drop was done just as a clickbait.
This is some DaVinci-level shit right here.
I just noticed this post -
Is "DaVinci" supposed to be "Shakespeare"?
Also, the C in Warcraft is not to be capitalized. GAF usually has better standards in |OT| thread titles
yes I'm anal
Yeah, fix that someone. Getting on my nerves.
8 out of 10 from me. Anyone giving this 5 or lower, or even comparing it to motherfucking Battlefield Earth, is just an idiot screaming for attention.
I just noticed this post -
Is "DaVinci" supposed to be "Shakespeare"?
Yeah, fix that someone. Getting on my nerves.