I'm not able to get the MSI Afterburner overlay working, however. The game doesn't boot with application detection on low.
Are you using v3.0? It introduced support for 64-bit exes.
I'm not able to get the MSI Afterburner overlay working, however. The game doesn't boot with application detection on low.
Has anybody had any crashes yet? Twice now while attempting to hack electronic billboards I crashed to the desktop.
Anyway, my specs:
i7-4770k stock
16 GB RAM
780 Ti SLI
Running everything at ultra (HBAO High, TXAA 4X, etc). On average I'm probably getting about 60 FPS, but it frequently drops into the 50's briefly and even into the 40's sometimes. When I'm driving there are frequent frame rate drops to the 40's, which has made driving a pain in the ass sometimes. Not happy with those drops at all. Tomorrow I'll either tweak my settings to find a sweet spot or lock the frame rate at 30 FPS.
Has anyone with an Nvidia promo code had the game unlocked on Uplay yet?
Mine still hasn't.
Mine unlocked at 12:15AM EST, so over 3 hours ago. I'm surprised your's still hasn't.
Are you using v3.0? It introduced support for 64-bit exes.
Crap, I have basically the same config as you, an i7 4770K @ 4.4Ghz, same CGs and 8Gb RAM, I was hoping there would be no stuttering. Hope it will be patched real soon because it's really annoying...i5 3570K @ 4.2ghz
16 gb of ram
SLI asus GTX 670 2gb
@1080P
Found the sweet spot for me :
TXAAx2
Textures - high
Shader - high
LOD - ultra
Reflections - ultra
Water - ultra
Shadows - high
Putting the very same settings but with shadows set to ultra, I get stuttering while driving, with the settings above game runs flawlessly.
Crap, I have basically the same config as you, an i7 4770K @ 4.4Ghz, same CGs and 8Gb RAM, I was hoping there would be no stuttering. Hope it will be patched real soon because it's really annoying...
Fraps nor MSI works for me.
i5 2500K at 4.0ghz
16GB Ram
4GB R9 290
1980x1020
TXAAx2
Textures - Ultra
Shader - high
LOD - ultra
Reflections - ultra
Water - ultra
Shadows - ultra
40-60 FPS when on foot depending on environments
30 FPS when driving.
This is before the drivers that are supposed to improve performance up to almost 30% from AMD. Could probably boost CPU for improved performance too as my OC is on low end.
All the talk of i5s being obsolete are way overstated.
For AMD folks, there's a download link for the 14.6 beta here on this page.
http://www.hardwareluxx.de/index.php/downloads/treiber/grafikkarten/doc_details/199-amd-catalyst-146-beta-fuer-fuer-windows-7881.html
Download is slow, but the drivers are legit. Just installed them.
TXAA works with AMD cards? I thought that was Nvidia exclusive
http://static.techspot.com/articles-info/827/bench/CPU_01.png[IMG]
So much for needing an i7 or a CPU that scores over 9000 in passmark.[/QUOTE]
This just proves more to me that everybody who was complaining about CPU utilization issues in the last thread must have had that bitcoin miner going taking up power.
"i5 is doomed" indeed.
This just proves more to me that everybody who was complaining about CPU utilization issues in the last thread must have had that bitcoin miner going taking up power.
"i5 is doomed" indeed.
This just proves more to me that everybody who was complaining about CPU utilization issues in the last thread must have had that bitcoin miner going taking up power.
"i5 is doomed" indeed.
We'll have to wait a month to hear back from those people.lol, was the Bitcoin miner story true?
nice! performance isnt as bad as i thought. it seems this would be very playable on a 750ti (~£110) at high settings (console equivalent) budget PC gaming redeemed!
What GPU was it using?http://static.techspot.com/articles-info/827/bench/CPU_01.png
So much for needing an i7 or a CPU that scores over 9000 in passmark.
Someone mirror this, the page is going down. :/
What GPU was it using?
That always seemed a bit suspect considering that the PS4 CPU probably scores around 3000 points in that benchmarkSo much for needing an i7 or a CPU that scores over 9000 in passmark.
What GPU was it using?
the maximum performance we extracted from the HIS R9 290X iPower IceQ X² Turbo 4GB when using the ultra-quality settings was 82fps and this was achieved with Core i7 and Core i5 processors. The AMD FX series also performed well, as the FX-8350 averaged 79fps and the FX-6350 hit 76fps to match the low-end Core i3-4130.
The quad-core FX-4320 struggled with just 67fps, but it was fast compared to the A8-7600 quad-core APU which allowed for just 52fps.The Haswell-based Pentium G3320 averaged just 51fps and the Celeron G1820 was even slower with 45fps.
The most shocking results probably came from the octa-core Phenom II X6 1100T which averaged just 49fps, while the quad-core X4 980 was a fraction faster with 50fps. AMD's new AM1 budget platform didn't fare so well either with 23fps, while the A4-4000 dual-core APU averaged even less with 22fps, on par with Intel's Celeron J1800.
This just proves more to me that everybody who was complaining about CPU utilization issues in the last thread must have had that bitcoin miner going taking up power.
"i5 is doomed" indeed.
![]()
So much for needing an i7 or a CPU that scores over 9000 in passmark.
These two graphs are quite at odds.![]()
So much for needing an i7 or a CPU that scores over 9000 in passmark.
I want a lock on 60 frames and as clean as possible IQ with little jaggies even if I sacrifiace some graphcis - what settings should I use to achieve this? Everything is at stock.
i7 4770k
8GB
GTX 670 2gb
Wins 8.1
I see a lot of people running settings and then reporting framerate. Is there anybody who is targeting roughly 60fps average and wants to report what sort of settings that requires? I know the vsync on this isnt supposed to be great so it probably requires a good amount of overhead but I'm still curious.
Ok, I should be more specific.either a titan or 770+ in SLI
Are you using v3.0? It introduced support for 64-bit exes.