It's a historical irony that many of the mainstream media programs that have run "shock" pieces on furry fandom have run into one roadblock: there aren't actually enough of those "insane, crazy, shocking" furries to go around.
So they've often had to fall back on hiring actors, and renting animal costumes (that, with further irony, are often of inferior quality to what actual furry fans make) to appear in their pieces and spice things up by acting things up. I recall hearing that a decade ago, some show that filmed something at a furry convention hired non-fans to come into the hotel in costumes and act wild in the background while they interviewed people To insure that everyone at home saw the con was full of crazies.
Of course, even when actual, nominal members of the subculture get on television, youtube, or radio, as in most such cases, they are often drawn from a small pool. The same people appearing in multiple venues to promote the same publicity and image.
At the end of the day though, all of this seems to me, kind of a dodge. It is a distraction from deeper, core issues; we can argue about stereotypes, argue about ignorance, etc. And there may be a lot of stereotypes and a lot of ignorance, yes.
But doesn't it also boil down to a lot of people just being unable to cope with what's really out there? The Internet is a gallery for a bunch of people to get together, while imagining they are part of a mainstream - the audience - and see all this strange stuff stream by to gawk at. Like the song says "Look at the bullies singing, to prove that they all belong."
Every time I see someone say "those furries are the only people I have a problem with", I think: really? You don't get out much if you think furries are the end of the earth. Or insert-whatever in place of "furries". Same difference.