Anyone who pays $70 in COD is basically allowing others to pay nothing

Geometric-Crusher

"Nintendo games are like indies, and worth at most $19" 🤡
To what extent does this not make some consumers second-class consumers?
namely Playstation consumers like me?

everyone is free but not with me, if Microsoft wants it that way, they can support this themselves and not with my $70
 
I mean, it's not "free", it's just a "Game Pass perk". But at least the option for those interested is still there for others to buy. It's like nothing has changed.
 
It's not free and you don't own the game. Gamepass has many pros, but there are games that I just want to own the physical version outright and don't mind paying the $70.
 
To what extent does this not make some consumers second-class consumers?
namely Playstation consumers like me?

everyone is free but not with me, if Microsoft wants it that way, they can support this themselves and not with my $70
Im anti-gamepass as it gets... but thats just nonsensical... you loose nothing, if you always paid for COD nothing changes for you.. and if Free day one games from MS is your thing, you have to get Gamepass.
Or COD will be ther first "free" game in gamepass that you paid for in playstation ? Sure theres more ... shit .. I paid for the crappy Forbidden West and 1 week later was on psplus.
 
If you play COD for a month or two then sure, yea. And I am sure MS has run the numbers and figured that out. But if you play COD for a long time then it still makes sense to buy it.

But really after the last few people should be wary of whatever this is, plus the horrible monetization (for a game that, unlike any other GAAS, is wiped clean every year), and SBMM, I won't be sad if COD goes the way of Halo.
 
If someone who plays COD only plays COD (like alot of them do) its actually more expensive for them to play for the year through Game Pass over just buying it.
 
200.gif


WHY YOU GET FREE BUT NOT ME!
 
Play COD for a month on GP, then pick up a used version for a fraction of the price. You just saved some bucks.
 
Its not MS fault that you don't have a PC or an Xbox. If you want to pay nothing too, just buy an Xbox or get an able PC and pay for gamepa.... oh wait.
 
oh, I saw that argument too

MS is not using paying customers as a way of subsidizing COD on Game Pass.

COD on GP is just a desparate move from MS to make GP to work.

Infact. the only way GP would really work is by making all of their games exclusive to Game Pass. (without having a chance to buy them anywhere else).
 
It's not free, they pay a subscription fee. This is like crying when a game is available on PS Plus for free and not on XB, get a grip.
 
I mean, it's not "free", it's just a "Game Pass perk".
I am convinced that this violates my rights
Playstation gamers cannot be treated as second class consumers
Imagine, I pay $70 to anyone who subscribed to GamePass 10 months ago to play Cod for free, not for free, we who play on PS5 will be paying for it.
Ideally, we, Playstation players, should avoid this game until some promotion is made, If MS decided to put COD on the gamepass, it should take the money out of its own pocket.
 
oh, I saw that argument too

MS is not using paying customers as a way of subsidizing COD on Game Pass.

COD on GP is just a desparate move from MS to make GP to work.

Infact. the only way GP would really work is by making all of their games exclusive to Game Pass. (without having a chance to buy them anywhere else).


Your post is a desperate move to make MS look desperate. :messenger_winking_tongue:
 
I am convinced that this violates my rights
Playstation gamers cannot be treated as second class consumers
Imagine, I pay $70 to anyone who subscribed to GamePass 10 months ago to play Cod for free, not for free, we who play on PS5 will be paying for it.
Ideally, we, Playstation players, should avoid this game until some promotion is made, If MS decided to put COD on the gamepass, it should take the money out of its own pocket.


Now all I see is this when he comments

200.gif



Thanks Warnen Warnen
 
oh, I saw that argument too

MS is not using paying customers as a way of subsidizing COD on Game Pass.

COD on GP is just a desparate move from MS to make GP to work.

Infact. the only way GP would really work is by making all of their games exclusive to Game Pass. (without having a chance to buy them anywhere else).


How's the plan to kill Game Pass before CoD releases coming along, churo?
 
This is why I won't pay more than $29.99 for Atlus games and prefer to buy used copies. Between giving it away for free on Gamepass and releasing improved versions of games later on, the competition these days is just too fierce for me to buy anything from them on launch.
 
To what extent does this not make some consumers second-class consumers?
namely Playstation consumers like me?

everyone is free but not with me, if Microsoft wants it that way, they can support this themselves and not with my $70
Microsoft is on the record saying they'd like to have gamepass on playstation, so... isn't the ball on Sony's court?
 
Top Bottom