They've been doing that since the previous generation. One of the reasons I got a 7900XT is because it has 20gb of VRAM.First sign that AMD is indeed reacting to what Nvidia does?
User title checks out.Useless for gaming
It would be great to have a card that has 32gb but is nowhere near 600w and doesn't use the new power connector
If there is one area that AMD have consistently been ahead of Nvidia in its VRAM at each price point.They've been doing that since the previous generation. One of the reasons I got a 7900XT is because it has 20gb of VRAM.
Give me an example of when you would need 32. Unless you're running 16k it's uselessGood, time to end the BS with anything below 16gb for GPUs at 500$ and more.
User title checks out.
modern gaming at any reasonable graphics setting. Plus if the raytracing performance is as good as they say it is, it'll be more futureproof than any Nvidia card not called 5090Give me an example of when you would need 32.
"future proof" is one (foolish) thing but there's still no game in existence at any graphics setting that'll need 32 gbs of vram.modern gaming at any reasonable graphics setting. Plus if the raytracing performance is as good as they say it is, it'll be more futureproof than any Nvidia card not called 5090
you underestimate the ability of developers to not give a fuckthere's still no game in existence at any graphics setting that'll need 32 gbs of vram.
You may not need the full 32gb, but it's more than 16gb and the only nvidia card that offers better than 16gb is the 5090 currently."future proof" is one (foolish) thing but there's still no game in existence at any graphics setting that'll need 32 gbs of vram.