Assassin's Creed Shadows officially has surpassed the launches of AC Origins and AC Odyssey according to UbiSoft

calico

Member
Lots of fake pro-Shadows news going around it seems but at least he deleted it.

Significantly underperforming Valhalla fits with the UK physical data and the garbage Steam numbers.
 

Kagoshima_Luke

Gold Member
Why are people acting as if 65K CCUs is something terrible though?
Because it is? It's a triple AAA release with no real competition and a full day 1 Steam launch which hasn't been the case with many Ubi games. Cyberpunk, a 5 year old game, had a 24 hour peak of 61K. 65K CCU is garbage and there will be some kind of fallout internally at Ubi; it's just a question of how extreme that will be.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Because it is? It's a triple AAA release with no real competition and a full day 1 Steam launch which hasn't been the case with many Ubi games. Cyberpunk, a 5 year old game, had a 24 hour peak of 61K. 65K CCU is garbage and there will be some kind of fallout internally at Ubi; it's just a question of how extreme that will be.

But you can also pay the game on PC on the Ubi subscription "for free" too right?
 

Humdinger

Gold Member
That is a thing that happens. It's called post-purchase rationalization.

I know it does (sometimes), but the poster exaggerated how much of a role it plays. He made it sound like everyone posting positive reviews was actually disappointed in the game but so upset about having spent $70 that they would fool themselves into thinking it was really good, when actually they didn't like it and were being dishonest with everyone.

That's nonsense. If people are dissatisfied with a product, they are more likely, not less, to lodge a negative review.

Besides, it's a matter of scale. The rationalization is more likely to happen with big investments - a car, a house, a marriage. With a trivial investment like a videogame, you'd have to be a pretty insecure person to need to rationalize dissatisfaction away as a good choice.
 
Why are people acting as if 65K CCUs is something terrible though?
I'll just quote myself from the other thread:
Not even half, less than half. When Odyssey launched, peak CCU was 16.3 million versus over 41 million for this month. A 4.5% improvement in peak CCU in an environment that is over 150% more active is quite lopsided and not in a good way...
Shadow's retention is much worse than Odyssey's, too. On the Monday after Odyssey peaked at 62K, it peaked at 51.1K. Contrast that with Shadows which peaked at 44.1K after hitting 64.8K the day before.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
I'll just quote myself from the other thread:

Shadow's retention is much worse than Odyssey's, too. On the Monday after Odyssey peaked at 62K, it peaked at 51.1K. Contrast that with Shadows which peaked at 44.1K after hitting 64.8K the day before.

But total percentage is a horrible way to measure any one game's success on PC or Steam. Why would you think otherwise?
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
wtf are these Odyssey numbers ? I thought the game sold well ?

er ... it did ..

It had sold 10+ million as of the last reporting in 2020 (5 years ago). Probably has sold some more since then with various sales and it getting the PS5/Series native patch later on.




Day 1 sales =/= lifetime sales.
 

RoboFu

One of the green rats
Why are these people trying so hard to claim the game a success? We won't know for a month at least.

It's just weird that so much of their existence is tied to such things.
 
Lots of fake pro-Shadows news going around it seems but at least he deleted it.

Significantly underperforming Valhalla fits with the UK physical data and the garbage Steam numbers.
The problem is that Ubisoft never actually announced actual sales numbers for Valhalla, the only thing they ever told their investors what that it "exceeded $1 billion revenue"

So we don't actually know how Valhalla performed, and I doubt we'll ever get any concrete information about how Shadows will perform

The only true indicator we'll ever have of how Shadows performed is if Tencent acquires Ubisoft or not. We can assume it underperformed if this happens
 
The problem is that Ubisoft never actually announced actual sales numbers for Valhalla, the only thing they ever told their investors what that it "exceeded $1 billion revenue"

So we don't actually know how Valhalla performed, and I doubt we'll ever get any concrete information about how Shadows will perform

The only true indicator we'll ever have of how Shadows performed is if Tencent acquires Ubisoft or not. We can assume it underperformed if this happens
Tencent is more than likely taking Ubisoft's scalp even if the sales performance is extraordinary (it's not). It's a foregone conclusion at this point.
 
Why are these people trying so hard to claim the game a success? We won't know for a month at least.

It's just weird that so much of their existence is tied to such things.

It’s actually the opposite… people desperately wanted the game to fail because some people did not like the idea of having a black samurai and female ninja leads. For months, before the game released people were super confident the game would be a complete flop and that didn’t happen so now those same people are trying to desperately to create “new metrics” to show why this game was a failure.

It’s extremely stupid and sad at the same time because at the end of the day companies should be able to just make the games they want to make.
 

A.Romero

Member
I'm not surprised. Even if it's not ghost of tsushima it's asscreed in Japan. Fans have been asking for that since the first game came out, the only thing I don't get is why it took them so long.

Also, the mass market doesn't care about the lead characters gender nor race.
 
It’s actually the opposite… people desperately wanted the game to fail because some people did not like the idea of having a black samurai and female ninja leads. For months, before the game released people were super confident the game would be a complete flop and that didn’t happen so now those same people are trying to desperately to create “new metrics” to show why this game was a failure.

It’s extremely stupid and sad at the same time because at the end of the day companies should be able to just make the games they want to make.
It's actually both, we have truly insane people on both the "want it to succeed" and "want it to fail" sides

The reality is that in a capitalist society, the companies have the right to make the games they want to make and the gamers have the right to not buy games they don't want to play. See Dragon Age: The Veilguard for more information
 
Why are these people trying so hard to claim the game a success? We won't know for a month at least.

It's just weird that so much of their existence is tied to such things.
this is just gaslighting when you know that isnt true.
Most of the videos and tweets anybody sees on AC Shadows is overwhelmingly negative because of Ubisoft's reputation, AC post Odyssey and Yasuke.
 

PeteBull

Member
anyone knows if Black Flag requires Ubiconnect to run on Steam ?
Dunno if u care enough but AC Blackflag is getting full fledged remake soon, so if u wanna play/replay it one more time dunno if u wanna maybe wait a bit longer :D
 
Last edited:

pudel

Member
It's actually both, we have truly insane people on both the "want it to succeed" and "want it to fail" sides

The reality is that in a capitalist society, the companies have the right to make the games they want to make and the gamers have the right to not buy games they don't want to play. See Dragon Age: The Veilguard for more information
Marvel Balance GIF
 

Topher

Identifies as young
It's actually both, we have truly insane people on both the "want it to succeed" and "want it to fail" sides

The reality is that in a capitalist society, the companies have the right to make the games they want to make and the gamers have the right to not buy games they don't want to play. See Dragon Age: The Veilguard for more information

The only thing that is "truly insane" is the gaslighting. I think rational people can look at the Steam CCU numbers and say that isn't great but also look at reports of how the game is doing overall and say it is obviously doing better elsewhere. Either way, I don't think anyone is arguing publishers shouldn't be able to make the game they want and gamers buy the games they want.
 

Lokaum D+

Member
Dunno if u care enough but AC Blackflag is getting full fledged remake soon, so if u wanna play/replay it one more time dunno if u wanna maybe wait a bit longer :D

I already platinumed the game, just wanted to play It again, but yeah, day one on remake.
 

Mattyp

Not the YouTuber
Who knows how it’s doing this early on, measuring sales or CCU is irrelevant when Ubisoft has Uplay or whatever it’s called now the same as Gamepass. They would rather you sign up to that and forget for half the year then sell a copy of this game contrary to what people think it’s the entire reason they offer the game on that service.

Haven’t played a AC since black flag and this 1 title isn’t going to save the company the size they are with the overheads and expenses they have at this point. How long until they can kick the next title out the door?
 

MMaRsu

Gold Member
The problem is that Ubisoft never actually announced actual sales numbers for Valhalla, the only thing they ever told their investors what that it "exceeded $1 billion revenue"

So we don't actually know how Valhalla performed, and I doubt we'll ever get any concrete information about how Shadows will perform

The only true indicator we'll ever have of how Shadows performed is if Tencent acquires Ubisoft or not. We can assume it underperformed if this happens
Ubi is done sooner or later 1 game selling well wont change that
 
Top Bottom