Thirty7ven
Banned
Aww, poor baby, I'm sure you'll survive.
Didn't even phase me.
Aww, poor baby, I'm sure you'll survive.
So this is a thread where we analyze Ubisoft employees words for a faceoff win.....I mean we don't even wait for the game and solid numbers anymore......What is bringing this desperation?
The PS5 has a weaker GPU so it might not be able to run at native 4K.I think it has everything to do with m$ deal, we all know ps5 is capable to run this game at 4K
Bit of joke really as it's a current gen game, biggest generation jump my ass
4k is incredibly resource intensive.Bit of joke really as it's a current gen game, biggest generation jump my ass
I understand that and do expect it with most Next-Gen graphically intensive games.4k is incredibly resource intensive.
Shooting for native 4k is an utter waste of time when you can achieve 98% of the image quality without tanking the performance.
Good IQ and 60fps > 4k30
I understand that and do expect it with most Next-Gen graphically intensive games.
But this ain't it.
I own every single one actuallyLol dude, u clearly never played AC games, yet to see a single game that pushes over assassin creed visuals at the scope these games are.
It's the first year of next-gen. A lot of the games were not designed around it, no less from a 3rd party developer. Overreact much?So Pro vs One X all over again
I own every single one actually![]()
You need a very beefy GPU to play current gen titles at 4k60.I understand that and do expect it with most Next-Gen graphically intensive games.
But this ain't it.
I think that even the XSX is upscaled too it will be a situation similar seen in XBX vs PS4 Pro where the XSX will have a higher and better resolution and assets.
I'll be genuinely suprised if the Xsx is native
How embarrassing.
It's the first year of next-gen. A lot of the games were not designed around it, no less from a 3rd party developer. Overreact much?
Well if u look on Resetera website beyound3D announced that Watchdog legion is so far confirmed that xsx version is upscaled 4k from 1440p to 4k
it's dynamic 4k, apparently during the day it is closer to 4k but at night + with a lot of reflections on screen it can drop to 1440p
No it was later measured at daytime to also be 1440p. 2 posts later.
ok weird. especially since the One X goes up to around 2050p and only goes as low as 1500p
that raytracing sure seems taxing
Up to 50 % supposedly, although how Miles Morales does it is a mystery, thats why it will be interesting to see how WD legion scales on ps5..
don't forget. With ray traced reflections, it can happen that you are effectively not rendering the one 1440p picture, but reflections in the visible region might also make stuff visible, that is on the opposite site (or around a coroner ...). That stuff must also get rendered at a proper resolution.ok weird. especially since the One X goes up to around 2050p and only goes as low as 1500p
that raytracing sure seems taxing
Valhalla doesn't have Raytracing.Is why i think with valhalla both consoles will be dynamic 4k probably same resolution. Both will have Raytracing but due to more cu the raytracing could be better on the xsx compared to ps5. But ps5 will or may end up with faster loading lods and could or may have better textures due to texture streaming
don't really care about 60fps for all gamesYou need a very beefy GPU to play current gen titles at 4k60.
Why would you expect superior graphics all the whilst maintaining native 4k?
If you want native 4k60, then you should be happy with PS4 Pro / XBX visuals for the entirety of next gen.
Ok fair enough. If it should have i must sayValhalla doesn't have Raytracing.
It's weaker but not that weaker where 4k native is the normality on serie X and not on ps5. I really don't get it this general convinction. I hardly believe Valhalla will be 4k native on console, people should look to the pc recommend specs before to talkThe PS5 has a weaker GPU so it might not be able to run at native 4K.
However, if the resolution of the PS5 version is 1800p or greater, then differences will not be perceptible.
900p (or sometimes much less) on a 1080p panel looks really bad, this is true no matter that platform you play on... 1440p or 1800p on a 4k panel is a different story, still not ideal, but the panel's pixels are so small it's much harder to discern.What made it serious biz was sony shitting on xbox 1080p vz 900p and sharing games remember. Now Sony is getting shit on from the go
Nothing would make me happier.If you want native 4k60, then you should be happy with PS4 Pro / XBX visuals for the entirety of next gen.
Ubisoft games are hardly the gold standard for next gen visuals.don't really care about 60fps for all games
But that's exactly what this is
We come from dynamic 4K & 4K 30fps to exactly the same 4k or Dynamic 4k but with 60fps on some titles with barely any graphical difference
Sorry but that's not a generation leap especially with theses titles that are based on current gen.
Will you be saying the same when Ubi push their Next-Gen engine and the resolution and framerate drops again?
I'll give you Demon Soul's and SM kinda but not by much.Ubisoft games are hardly the gold standard for next gen visuals.
Spiderman and Demons Souls look better than anything on the PS4.
The gameplay trailer for Miles Morales looks absolutely bonkers to my eyes. Ratchet and Clank also has a CG quality to it.I'll give you Demon Soul's and SM kinda but not by much.
But yeah I agree
Maybe I'm looking for that MGS2 momentThe gameplay trailer for Miles Morales looks absolutely bonkers to my eyes. Ratchet and Clank also has a CG quality to it.
It's going to be harder to impress people with each successive generation. Still, most of the first wave PS4 titles look like shit compared to God of War and TLOU2.Maybe I'm looking for that MGS2 moment
or Because I'm currently seeing less of a jump then there was for AC4 on PS4 vs PS3
Makes you wonder what happens when this gens ACUnity arrives
It's going to be harder to impress people with each successive generation. Still, most of the first wave PS4 titles look like shit compared to God of War and TLOU2.
People forgot that Ubisoft came on stage and said that AC and some other games would be 4k on the XBOX ONE X, many people run with that thinking it was Native.....Best is to wait, I think the Ubisoft games will run well enough on next gen consoles. PRO has the best performance in Watch Dogs so far, so a 60fps mode along with the RT mode at 4k native is possible for next gen consoles. I think the same will apply for Valhalla.....Already said so no way in hell that game will run at 4k and 60 fps.
I don't believe for a second 4k native will be a thing on Ubisoft games IF 60 fps or raytracing are on the table, especially knowing them. Maybe in games with more scripted/limited scenario but open world? Nope .People forgot that Ubisoft came on stage and said that AC and some other games would be 4k on the XBOX ONE X, many people run with that thinking it was Native.....Best is to wait, I think the Ubisoft games will run well enough on next gen consoles. PRO has the best performance in Watch Dogs so far, so a 60fps mode along with the RT mode at 4k native is possible for next gen consoles. I think the same will apply for Valhalla.....
Those are first party games and yes they still look good.Which titles? The Order? Killzone? Infamous? Drive Club? Did you even got to see those titles?
Not to mention graphics don't mean shit whether a game is good or not, you want to look at great graphics go watch some CGI movies instead, but there's more than that when ot comes to games, way more than that. But to each of their own I guess.
Those are first party games and yes they still look good.
third party titles looked bad.
My prediction is expect a lot of tweets like this from Xbox this generation.
I do, what prize do I now win?Do you consider yourself a non-biased source?
Xbox UK is a fan site?Thats not from Xbox, that is a fan site.
I do, what prize do I now win?