It would be like using the term "blacklist" to describe the removal of a particular feature, in front of a black person and having them get offended. (Or someone get offended on their behalf).I don’t think anyone’s arguing about whether or not it’s terminology that’s actually used. It’s just the ridiculousness of using that word for a context like that. It just smacks of the fashionableness now of using words like ‘disability’ or ‘vulnerable’ or the like. It’s just lame and peeps are rightfully making fun of it.
It's not a problem if you're capable of understanding that the meaning of the original phrase doesn't change, just because it's used in a different context.
Not being able to use benign technical terms just because someone might get offended feels like word policing.