Good luck. I got a warning back in February after playing Helldivers 2. I don't message people and generally keep my microphone off. I did revenge kill a group that were trolling me in game so the only thing I can think is that they mass reported me but that doesn't exactly match the criteria for the email Sony sent me. I tried contacted support for more information which was a fruitless exercise.
Context matters, the same way a nudist beach isn't pornographic. Take a hot woman from that beach, put her at home on her bed in some cute panties (more clothed than the beach!) and it becomes pornographic.
www.resetera.com
PS needs to get rid of photo mode. It annoys most people who don't want to use it and the minority that does use it risks getting banned.
i bet OP has been arguing some other peeps online (prolly CoD) and now telling using photomode caused ban ^^
It’s still absurd because Sony and Microsoft content regulate the stores. Every game also goes through regional content ratings. If someone is banned for sharing a screenshot of a game distributed on those stores, it’s not only a failure on part of the individual who shared it (if it violates terms of service), but also the distributors. Sony can’t accuse OP of failing to comply with the code of conduct, when they’re enabling it. It’s like saying don’t share these drugs, but you can buy them from me. Lmao.Not that surprising, people on GAF and Era have reported similar bans for uploading pictures of Cyberpunk on XBL, a game that is sold on the storefronts. Selling the game on storefront doesn't preclude you from getting banned for uploading what they might deem inappropriate.
The ban is not the surprising part, the PERMANENT ban is.
Xbox Enforcement Nonsense (Cyberpunk 2077?)
So, I finally decided to buy Cyberpunk on my Series S and started to play it last night. I was quite pleased with the visuals which got me very excited for the photo mode. There is a part in one of the very first missions where you have to carry an unconscious and nude female body. I took two...
Ever?
That's what got OP into this mess.
OP either lies or shared meow pics with some "anime waifu" or set that tail pic as profile pic
You having a problem with people questioning inconsistencies in what someone says is a you problem. The OP was asked a number of times to clarify some things he said and he simply did not. That has nothing to do with broken systems. That is based entirely on the OP's own words.
Bullshit. I asked you a simple question on what you were calling "ignorance". And even if I had "challenged" your thoughts....so what? You really believe your comments cannot be questioned? I'm sorry to be the one to tell you this, but you are quite wrong. I'll question as much as I want.
Who challenged your thoughts other than seeking clarification of what you meant by the ignorance in the thread? My problem (LOL, like anyone on message boards cares) is people that go straight into asshole mode instead of explaining their position when asked a simple question for clarification.
Bet she could drop enough rope to skip with
But that could easily be countered by arguing that if you own a physical disc you could still play the games. And I don't think if challenged with a good legal team, any court would agree that if you spend money to purchase a game that they can say you don't own it. At the very least I think courts would meet in the middle and say ok, you can take away their access to the games, but then you have to refund their purchases.
How did it get to this?
