• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bloodborne Reviews Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
CA4xxZsWkAA9NrJ.png


someone doesnt like the game

Urgh, this guy, what games does he play? Does he say this about every game with violence?
 

Google

Member
EDGE,IGN and Eurogamer.

I think Nathan is writing EDGEs review and Rich Stanton is doing Eurogamer. His impressions came out yesterday and he's basically said it's his favourite or second favourite video game ever (behind Dark Souls).

They're waiting to review the online and server component before awarding a score.
 

Nokterian

Member
This guy?

va2wzwq.png

Ah yes Dan is a weird one..had a huge discussion with him about FoV a long time ago you can plow through my twitter it is there somewhere he thought i was attacking and i wasn't just a healthy discussion but he still didn't understand a low FoV for PC is not good (i get motion sickness and dizzy from it) that's not only me. But i had other encounters with him most of the time he doesn't know what he is talking about. Now i remember he blocked me on twitter dunno what happend back then but i think i was right and he was totally wrong and couldn't handle it.

Anyway he keeps bitching about bloodborne for the past 24 hours? That's...pathetic. At least i can't wait to play it tomorrow!
 

Docflem

Member
Yes, art is an expression/idea but it's not always political. Some games sure but all? No. There are some people who just over think things.

As I said earlier people just use that word "political" as a way to escape meaningful critique. Here's a thought, Google the definition of politics and then think about how your using the word here, doesn't really work does it?
 
So you haven't played the game, yet you are claiming the game plays the same way as its spiritual predecessors?

Yeah I was going to point this out as well.

It read like he had played the game and it would've made sense. "I picked this up and I'm aware of the rave reviews, but I'm just feeling like it's more of the same", OK, that's a fair first impression.

Then he said he will play it in the future. Wut. Talking at length about how a game plays without playing the game...
 

vin-buc

Member
As I said earlier people just use that word "political" as a way to escape meaningful critique. Here's a thought, Google the definition of politics and then think about how your using the word here, doesn't really work does it?

The point is not about the generality or the looseness of the word "politics" but the point here is the "over thinking" aspect. Get it?
 

autoduelist

Member
There are dozen's of 9s & 10s but folks can only focus on the few outlier opinions. People seem to always need a punching bag when someone doesn't like a game they are hyped about.

It makes sense. People debate / argue (depending on tone, I suppose) everything... it just seems like people are getting piled on when one side is, as you say, the outlier. One could just as easily point out some people enjoy being the outlier / devil's advocate / odd man out. Besides, you're wrong that 'people can only focus' on the outliers... plenty of people in this very thread were discussing the positive reviews too... it's just that two people agreeing with each other doesn't contain the same fireworks as two people disagreeing so the pile ons are far more obvious.
 

Docflem

Member
The point is not about the generality or the looseness of the word "politics" but the point here is the "over thinking" aspect. Get it?

Hmm, it seems you don't understand what I'm trying to say, you're deflecting a debate instead of engaging when you incorrectly use "political" or when you dismiss it by saying people just "over think" it. As I stated I too believe bloodborne's violence shouldn't be held as a negative, but I made supporting counter arguments instead of just outright dismissing the whole idea.
 

thefil

Member
Perhaps y'all can stop searching through a guy's old tweets to find reasons to hate him? If you give him the benefit of the doubt, he was commenting that violence is ubiquitous in games and it's boring that they are the games that get huge critical and press attention. None of this is evil mastermind dirtbag stuff.

Let people have opinions on Twitter without crucifying them for not meeting some standard of consistency in thought you and I do not bother looking for in ourselves. It's not like Twitter is an outlet where we expect thoughtful rhetoric.

There's a difference between a) commenting on his opinion with the work put in to make sure you don't misrepresent it and b) constructing a straw man you can scoff at without seriously considering the perspective.
 

Docflem

Member
Perhaps y'all can stop searching through a guy's old tweets to find reasons to hate him? If you give him the benefit of the doubt, he was commenting that violence is ubiquitous in games (fact) and it's boring that they are the games that get huge critical and press attention. None of this is evil mastermind dirtbag stuff.

Let people have opinions on Twitter without crucifying them for not meeting some standard of consistency in thought you and I do not bother looking for in ourselves. It's not like Twitter is an outlet where we expect thoughtful rhetoric.

There's a difference between a) commenting on his opinion with the work put in to make sure you don't misrepresent it and b) constructing a straw man you can scoff at without seriously considering the perspective.

While this is not the thread to pile on people's tweets your reasoning seems off, if people didn't want the opinions discussed and critiqued why broadcast them to the whole world?
 

Omnipunctual Godot

Gold Member
Perhaps y'all can stop searching through a guy's old tweets to find reasons to hate him? If you give him the benefit of the doubt, he was commenting that violence is ubiquitous in games (fact) and it's boring that they are the games that get huge critical and press attention. None of this is evil mastermind dirtbag stuff.
It's not about "evil mastermind dirtbag stuff" so much as giving people an idea of the character of the person levying criticism here. You may not like the things he said, but he said them in a public forum, and people can look at them and decide if his is an opinion worth listening to.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Totalbiscuit/status/580287722524409856

Here's a quote from total biscuit I thought was pure snobbery , sorry I'm on phone

Considering the praise Bloodborne is getting, might be worth trying to soldier through despite 30fps. Did with Dark Souls before the mod.
I agree, but it's a pretty common sentiment among PC-centric gamers concerning Bloodborne. Going from 60FPS to 30 can be a big change, but the visuals of Bloodborne seem stellar.
 

Odrion

Banned
Hey guys, where's the URL to the Bloodborne review Jonathan McIntosh wrote? Was it on Polygon or Joystick?

Wait, neither? He just some dude who wrote some bullshit on twitter? Then why are we talking about it?
 

vin-buc

Member
Hmm, it seems you don't understand what I'm trying to say, you're deflecting a debate instead of engaging when you incorrectly use "political" or when you dismiss it by saying people just "over think" it. As I stated I too believe bloodborne's violence shouldn't be held as a negative, but I made supporting counter arguments instead of just outright dismissing the whole idea.

I get you. You like to have a debate for the sake of debating.
 

Kssio_Aug

Member

Besides I've always enjoyed the Souls games (and a lot actually, to become even one of my favorite RPGs ever), I have to agree with that boss statement. When playing Dark Souls 1 I was devastaded by Four Kings, first because I had going into the pit without the ring, and many other tries next just getting kicked by him... the boss is actually quite awesome to be honest, but it was extremely frustrating to run all the way through, since Valley of Drakes, to get beaten like 5, 6, 7 times! For that reason I almost gave up the game... I became like 1 entire month without touching it, then I came back, did it, and kept going till the end. Awesome game, but that almost broke my entire experience!
 

thefil

Member
While this is not the thread to pile on people's tweets your reasoning seems off, if people didn't want the opinions discussed and critiqued why broadcast them to the whole world?

I don't think the discussion here is in good faith.

People are saying he is critiquing Bloodborne specifically, which he is not. Everyone here agrees that violence in Bloodborne is justified. Nobody has commented on the ubiquity of violence in games or the prevalence of violent games in the press cycle. So we are not discussing his opinion, we are taking a surface view of his opinion as a straw man and railing against it.

But more than that, the thread has been derailed calling him an idiot, lunatic, and "deranged", as well as dredging up his old posts as a way to discredit him and not his opinion.
 
Besides I've always enjoyed the Souls games (and a lot actually, to become even one of my favorite RPGs ever), I have to agree with that boss statement. When playing Dark Souls 1 I was devastaded by Four Kings, first because I had going into the pit without the ring, and many other tries next just getting kicked by him... the boss is actually quite awesome to be honest, but it was extremely frustrating to run all the way through, since Valley of Drakes, to get beaten like 5, 6, 7 times! For that reason I almost gave up the game... I became like 1 entire month without touching it, then I came back, did it, and kept going till the end. Awesome game, but that almost broke my entire experience!

I've just played two bosses but once you get near to their place you can open up shortcuts.
 

Schryver

Member
Yeah but "soldier through" he may as well just call us all peasants and be done with it

Considering he almost exclusively plays on PC and does consider consoles vastly inferior yeah that's exactly what he was thinking lol.
Pretty sure he just bought two Titan Xs if that tells you anything
 
Sometimes I wonder if he's a Gamergater account used to discredit their opposition. Would be less terrifying than if he was for real.

The fact that he is 100% serious is why I wish people would stop quoting him and just ignore him altogether. There is nothing to be gained from from his insight or comments regarding anything. Any actual good point he makes has been, and can be, made better by someone else. And I really don't want to be around for any shitstorm when more people realize who he actually is.
 
When playing Dark Souls 1 I was devastaded by Four Kings, first because I had going into the pit without the ring, and many other tries next just getting kicked by him... the boss is actually quite awesome to be honest, but it was extremely frustrating to run all the way through, since Valley of Drakes, to get beaten like 5, 6, 7 times!
It takes a measly 2 minutes or so to get back to the boss if you're taking shortcuts starting from Firelink Shrine, but I could see it adding up until you get decent at making the run there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom