DryvBy
Member

Activision finally admits to using AI & CoD players aren’t surprised at all - Dexerto
Activision has finally admitted to using AI-generated content in its games and Call of Duty players aren’t at all surprised.

Don't see the problem if it helps cut development time and the overall budget. Hopefully this leads to publisher willing to take more risks so we don't get the same slop that we've played a hundred times before.Get used to it. It's inevitable
Should add DEI disclosure too if the developer or publisher has dei statement/dei department or using sweet baby inc as consultation.
Should add DEI disclosure too if the developer or publisher has dei statement/dei department or using sweet baby inc as consultation.
Can't they use AI to make COD AI so the game feels more realistic at least?Get used to it. It's inevitable
Actually, I don’t necessarily agree.Get used to it. It's inevitable
Should add DEI disclosure too if the developer or publisher has dei statement/dei department or using sweet baby inc as consultation.
Yeah I can see AI tools becoming widespread for asset creation and speeding up workflows. Got no problem with that.
Yeah I've seen those shitty games made by AI. I bet many suits are creaming over the idea but I believe actual good videogames made by an AI are still many years away.The problem is that it opens the door to escalation, which MS has already shamelessly announced.
Uncle Phil's pipedream is to have "baristas making videogames".
What the fuck?
You people are sick.
Sounds like you’ve got a lot on your plate
![]()
Yeah.
Im a none-immigrant traveller to the US often and keep my original documents in a safe deposit box.
Not sure what that has to do with anything?
P.S
Offsite shit is against GAF TOS fyi.
It doesn't.Don't see the problem if it helps cut development time and the overall budget.
Pretty sure blanket insults like “You people are sick” would be on the TOS but I don’t go running to look at them every time I don’t like what a user said
It shows the hypocrisy of you calling someone sick when you’ve clearly got some issuesWho are the you people I'm refering?
Still begs the question. What my post on ERA has to do with anything?
It shows the hypocrisy of you calling someone sick when you’ve clearly got some issues
It can help with asset creation. Designs, textures, and their normal maps and all that shit. Also helps with coding, although I still prefer the good ol' visit to stackoverflow.It doesn't.
Did you even read what you screen capped or process its context? Lmao.It shows the hypocrisy of you calling someone sick when you’ve clearly got some issues
I don't get people going to ERA and then referencing things here either unless it would be some sort of actual newsYeah, they definitely use AI on a variety of graphics, and they make it abundantly clear, which is wild. They're not even trying to hide it, lmao. I really wish they wouldn't, I mean, they have fully capable artists.
Did you even read what you screen capped or process its context? Lmao.
I still don't get why some even bother going to Era if it's a place you "hate", lol. It's a lot better when you just don't pay attention to something if you genuinely don't like it.
LolShould add DEI disclosure too if the developer or publisher has dei statement/dei department or using sweet baby inc as consultation.
Yeah and avoid Disco Elysium!Follow this and at least each game’s store page will a note on it if it’s in the list.
![]()
Steam Curator: Sweet Baby Inc detected
🌐 | Website: deidetected.com 🍺 | Memberships & Donations: buymeacoffee.com/kabrutus 📽️ | YT Channel: youtube.com/@kabrutusrambo ✖️ | Twitter: x.com/kabrutusrambo 🟣 | Discord: discord.gg/detectedstore.steampowered.com
![]()
Likely wont change much until their sales plummetProbably not surprising by basically everybody since their games doesn't seems to diferentiate much.
You and I both. Battlefield and COD together were a strong combo back in the day, especially with both IPs focusing on their own different strengths. But as years went on they unfortunately got more and more similar. I miss the days of when Battlefield was the game you'd play to experience all out warfare that included vehicles and chaos. Whereas COD was just more on the ground, infantry experiences. It was fun to go back and forth more so IMO.Likely wont change much until their sales plummet
I think the market needs a great alternative and as foolish as I know this is I have hopes the next BF returns to greatness
But I know how that will turn out
People are upset with how it could affect a number of industries and the availability of jobs, which I feel makes sense. Also things that are considered an art form that are best completed by human beings being replaced. Some people are a bit more heavy opinionated about it, which I don't agree with, but I get some of the concerns personally.AI will lower costs, create many MANY more game developers, and help produce high-quality visuals (and visual progress) without making the cost of doing so becoming prohibitive.
Meaning?
AI could create a far more creative, risk-tolerant industry. I have no idea why people are upset by this stuff.
the AI stuff looks like shit. Is it really better to have cheaper, faster output of total garbage? is it really good that it means they can churn out shitty battle passes faster?Yeah I can see AI tools becoming widespread for asset creation and speeding up workflows. Got no problem with that.
I'm not talking about making AI assets and using then as is. I'm talking about speeding up the creation process, because a competent artist could create assets a lot faster by modifying and cleaning up AI generated stuff rather than creating them for scratch.the AI stuff looks like shit
Well, clearly they're not doing that, and broadly speaking, it doesn't appear to be how people use AI. They let AI take over their thinking.I'm not talking about making AI assets and using then as is. I'm talking about speeding up the creation process, because a competent artist could create assets a lot faster by modifying and cleaning up AI generated stuff rather than creating them for scratch.
And it's not just assets, it can help with the code as well.
Yeah, that's the thing. Some people see AI and immediately jump ship, but people are already using it for code, and "behind the curtain" tasks. I feel like that's where it really shines. I could see it helping with concept art and references. But it should never, ever be the final product. Some of the art in COD looks like they just AI'd it, and maybe did few minor effects. Feels weird when there's a talented and capable team. Especially when you know how much money they make, lol.I'm not talking about making AI assets and using then as is. I'm talking about speeding up the creation process, because a competent artist could create assets a lot faster by modifying and cleaning up AI generated stuff rather than creating them for scratch.
And it's not just assets, it can help with the code as well.
That's a lot of assumptions. The fact is that it can be used to speed up the creation of quality code and assets, and imo anything else is cope.Well, clearly they're not doing that, and broadly speaking, it doesn't appear to be how people use AI. They let AI take over their thinking.
Like look at what teachers are saying, students aren't using "AI in their research", they're just telling AI to generate papers and then putting their name on it. It would be useful to use AI as a sort of first draft that you clean up later, whether it is code or art, but that's not what is happening.
No, it's not an assumption, it's what is happening. Look at six fingered Santa zombie in this thread. TIme to face reality.That's a lot of assumptions. The fact is that it can be used to speed up the creation of quality code and assets, and imo anything else is cope.
The incompetence of a few doesn't mean that it's happening everywhere dude.No, it's not an assumption, it's what is happening. Look at six fingered Santa zombie in this thread. TIme to face reality.
This is the real copeThe incompetence of a few doesn't mean that it's happening everywhere dude.
That's the company's fault tho. AI is just a tool, if someone decides to churn out some ugly shit that's on them, but don't blame the tool.This is the real cope
Do I think that the artists working on COD wanted to release that shitter Santa? No. But the company says "it's fine, ship it". That's what happens. The trend is towards this. AI is used to churn out cheap junky assets and the standard is very low and the pressure is to release more faster. It's just blatantly obvious and there are blatant examples in this thread.