twilo99
Member
The bottom line is ps5 pro is future proof for this gen on console side, before we see ps6 possibly 2028.
Future proof with CPU architecture from 5 years ago … solid
The bottom line is ps5 pro is future proof for this gen on console side, before we see ps6 possibly 2028.
Did you turn of all of the post processing options to see if it help with shimmering especially motion blur? I posted a video in this thread which demonstrates this. It practically get rid of most shimmering.Thats because those games are upscaling from a much higher resolution. even DLSS 4k quality >>>> DLSS 1440p performance because 4k quality reconstructs from 1440p while dlss 1440p performance scales from 720p.
You NEED to up the base resolution to at least 1080p. 4k dlss performance is kinda soft but is mostly clean. anything below that and even dlss has issues. i mostly just reduce the settings or turn off ray tracing in order to play games at dlss quality or dlss balanced because even 4k dlss performance is too blurry for me.
AI is not magic. Everyone who games on PCs knows this. you need raw GPU power on top of AI upscaling. 45% more power gets you from 720p to 900p at best. they are using 864p which is maybe 35% more raw pixels. just not enough.
AW2 also has a shimmering issue even on PC related to their post processing setting which is set to Low on consoles. You need to set to high on PC because even at medium, its a shimmering mess. Problem is that even going from medium to high is a 20-25% performance increase. They have to go from low to high on the pro and there just isnt enough GPU there to increase the resolution AND this setting.
to be fair, i had to play this game at 40 fps locked because that setting pretty much killed my framerate and without it, the game looked like a shimmering mess so even on PC its a tradeoff. at least on pc i was able to adjust this setting manually, cant do that even on the quality mode on the pro. again, not enough gpu power.
I think retaining the same CPU is something to do with compatibility with current gen. Like I said, its possible 2028 for ps6, so maybe 3 to 4 years, just a short while it can be considered future proof for console side, for those 3 to 4 years to go in this console cycle. I'm not talking about pc.Future proof with CPU architecture from 5 years ago … solid
Where is a more future proof console? If I understand the post, I believe they meant future titles will be able to take advantage of PSSR and squeeze out more performance of console versions of games.Future proof with CPU architecture from 5 years ago … solid
There is no point in the PS5 Pro having a better CPU when it will only be used for playing PS5 games.Future proof with CPU architecture from 5 years ago … solid
never did try that, but i like the post processing effects in that game since they give it that CG filmic look. without it, the game would probably look rather basic.Alan
Did you turn of all of the post processing options to see if it help with shimmering especially motion blur? I posted a video in this thread which demonstrates this. It practically get rid of most shimmering.
Okay, so I'm still getting a PS5 Pro, but that review did not exactly seem favorable and pretty underwhelming. Outside of a few standout titles the whole thing seemed rather meh. I guess it's early days but on PS4 Pro, we had games like Infamous Second Son and HZD that showed massive improvements right off the bat.
so?its a 4070......and its a single GPU.
The PS5 PRO is a whole console.
The CPU architecture that is going to be the target for 99% of the developers. With exceptions like when things PC-centric like when Witcher 4 releases…Future proof with CPU architecture from 5 years ago … solid
Future proof with CPU architecture from 5 years ago … solid
so?
It just proves that mid range tech from early 2023 absolutely crushes a late 2024 ”pro” console
Consoles used to be good (360, ps2 etc) or at least have original tech (ps3, ps2, gamecube, 360 etc)
now 5 year old cpu and gpu tech is ”pro”.. yeah right
But the shimmering killed the whole presentation overall. I guess you need motion blur below 60fps.never did try that, but i like the post processing effects in that game since they give it that CG filmic look. without it, the game would probably look rather basic.
its a simple game with mostly walking sections so i didnt mind playing it at 40 fps and dropping down to 30 fps in the few times you head back out to the forest.
zen 4 cpus are the same architecture. the same work that went into upgrading from RDNA 2 to RDNA 4 with custom AI and RT enhancements couldve gone into upgrading their zen 2 chip to zen 4.I think retaining the same CPU is something to do with compatibility with current gen. Like I said, its possible 2028 for ps6, so maybe 3 to 4 years, just a short while it can be considered future proof for console side, for those 3 to 4 years to go in console cycle. I'm not talking about pc.
You live and troll these Pro threads.Are you?
This is clearly not what you expected.
Should we pay 600 for a series x with a 2tb drive though.700 pounds for "something" like fidelity mode at performance mode.
Don't fall for this shit peeps. Please.
What other Console in the market has better CPU? Its an honest question.Future proof with CPU architecture from 5 years ago … solid
PC gaming with top hardware was always superior though. The thing about consoles is that they are the best in terms of cost vs performance. That's still the thing with PS5 Pro. That's all.so?
It just proves that mid range tech from early 2023 absolutely crushes a late 2024 ”pro” console (a 4070 doubles ps5 pro performance haha)
And nvidia is about to release next gen any month now
Consoles used to be high tech (360, dc, ps2 etc) or at least have original tech (ps3, ps2, gamecube, 360 etc)
now 5 year old pc mid range cpu and gpu tech… sold as ”pro”.. yeah right
Yea nice. Keen as for Kingdom Come 2 but we gotta get better than 30fps. It's a shame the first game is stuck at such a pathetic performance point.Silent Hill 2 and Kingdom Come 2 are listed as getting Pro patches now
Indeed i don't trust these guys to manage 60 even with the ProYea nice. Keen as for Kingdom Come 2 but we gotta get better than 30fps. It's a shame the first game is stuck at such a pathetic performance point.
im not sure what are you bragging here. What is the "haha" here? "so" what?so?
It just proves that mid range tech from early 2023 absolutely crushes a late 2024 ”pro” console (a 4070 doubles ps5 pro performance haha)
And nvidia is about to release next gen any month now
Consoles used to be high tech (360, dc, ps2 etc) or at least have original tech (ps3, ps2, gamecube, 360 etc)
now 5 year old pc mid range cpu and gpu tech… sold as ”pro”.. yeah right
yeah not so much, when every other release is a stuttering, stumbling afterthought of a pc port, regardless of how much money you throw at your buildso?
It just proves that mid range tech from early 2023 absolutely crushes a late 2024 ”pro” console (a 4070 doubles ps5 pro performance haha)
And nvidia is about to release next gen any month now
Consoles used to be high tech (360, dc, ps2 etc) or at least have original tech (ps3, ps2, gamecube, 360 etc)
now 5 year old pc mid range cpu and gpu tech… sold as ”pro”.. yeah right
The PC salty race need to chill out.
Future proof with CPU architecture from 5 years ago … solid
You live and troll these Pro threads.
Pretty sad you are.
I thought you living in Pro threads and nonstop trolling was pretty sad but now you cowardly play dumb instead of manning up and admitting what you clearly do.Troll with what? Information?
What the fuck are you smoking?
Everything is attack to you, you and your friends were hyping this thing like second coming of Jesus: 33TF, 4070 super power level, rt on level of 7900xtx. And when I said something that was actually close to real performance of this thing I was "trolling" and "attacking".
Guess what? It was never gonna perform like you wished.
Yeah John was saying that it was probably the best looking game ever made on Console and that it compares to a high end PC game.Im kind of excited to give Horizon Forbidden West a go too. The DF team really made that sound impressive.
Buster Wolf?Are you ok?
Bro. Just stop.
They think that by us paying for this at the price where it's at with no disc drive it will be an incentive for Sony to make this the norm for the next generations of Playstation. That's the reason for them trying to derail people.
Real win for me is better FPS but mainly PSSR. Fuck console FSR- kill it with fire.Finally, a console that draws more power than the launch PS3 lol (weird that the slim uses more power than the launch PS5 model too)
Honestly, this is pretty dire. £700 for ~30% extra performance is disappointing. They really should have improved the CPU.
Future proof with CPU architecture from 5 years ago … solid
So the Pro has to beat a $600 GPU alone. Okso?
It just proves that mid range tech from early 2023 absolutely crushes a late 2024 ”pro” console (a 4070 doubles ps5 pro performance haha)
And nvidia is about to release next gen any month now
Consoles used to be high tech (360, dc, ps2 etc) or at least have original tech (ps3, ps2, gamecube, 360 etc)
now 5 year old pc mid range cpu and gpu tech… sold as ”pro”.. yeah right
Finally, a console that draws more power than the launch PS3 lol (weird that the slim uses more power than the launch PS5 model too)
Honestly, this is pretty dire. £700 for ~30% extra performance is disappointing. They really should have improved the CPU.
PS6 will undoubtedly not include a disc drive. It will only be an accessory
$699 PS6 would also not surprise me
I couldn't care less about disc drive. It will sell fine.Agreed. They're gonna have to really talk some major selling points to sell people on it, apart it from being just a next-gen console. And I guess by selling the Pro as they are, they are collecting that data now in preparation.
AI is not magic. Everyone who games on PCs knows this. you need raw GPU power on top of AI upscaling. 45% more power gets you from 720p to 900p at best. they are using 864p which is maybe 35% more raw pixels. just not enough.
I'll pay $700 just to not have to see FSR used anymoreFuture proof with CPU architecture from 5 years ago … solid
its just math.