Takes
Takes
You could not pick a COD more ready to land with a thud.
One of these days the people saying COD is dead will get it rightSaid everyone, for the last eight years.
The ability for people to sign up for a month to play and then cancel when it's no longer needed is just the nature of subscriptions. MS has to understand that and will likely factor that in. Things are dynamic as they are and from reading some people's comments here, COD will initially attract those with Game Pass subs who've been ignoring the series, who didn't find the game worth putting down $60-70 for but will jump in due to the sub they already have.People need to realize that Game Pass has reached however many people it meant to reach. That's why Xbox has constantly increasing its price. Because they don't see any volumetric growth, which is why they are increasing revenue by increasing ARPU.
- 2021 - "Bethesda's back-catalog will move the needle for Game Pass." -- It didn't.
- 2022 - "Halo Infinite will move the needle for Game Pass." -- It didn't.
- 2023 - "Starfield will move the needle for Game Pass." -- It didn't.
- 2024 - "COD BO6 will move the needle for Game Pass." -- It won't.
COD will not bring many new long-term subscribers to Game Pass. People may sign in for a month ($20) to play COD and then unsubscribe, which won't help Xbox; it will in fact harm Xbox more. The only win for Xbox here is if COD brings subscribers that will stay subscribed for months and even years, and that's not happening.
This forum rarely discusses it, but brand matters. PlayStation, Nintendo, Apple... all of them are just as corporate as the rest but they've all cultivated reputations and a level of brand affinity that keep their customers sticky year after year. Then you look at companies that have let their brands fall from grace, like XBOX, Disney and Ubisoft - products are the bricks and mortar of your business, but reputation is the foundation you are building on.Man, stop with the tribal BS. Xbox has consistently failed to deliver on exclusives for a long time now. It's a chronic problem thanks to Phil Spencer who thinks great games don't move hardware.
If it was 3 exclusives at the level of the first couple of Halo games, early Gears and Forza then they'd get way more support.
The reason people are so on board with Playstation is because they have delivered consistently enough that they have build up a wealth of trust. Xbox obliterated that thanks to Phil giving up on regular high quality exclusives and letting unfinished shit come out way too often.
If you blame consumers you're a lost cause. You should be blaming Xbox as this situation is all of their own doing.
I guess sales don't really matter
Yes he didexactly what i was about to say.
also did Phil re-tweet?
I guess sales don't really matter
When I was reading the quote, this is exactly what I was thinking."Did you know a new “Call of Duty” game is launching this week?
If not, Microsoft would probably pay to find out where you’ve been hiding, because the tech giant has shelled out a marketing budget comparable to any “major motion picture blockbuster that would be launching this year,” according to Tyler Bahl, the chief marketing officer at “Call of Duty” studio Activision, to get “Black Ops 6” on every consumer’s radar"
Bullshit. When Sony had marketing rights COD was everywhere. While its its not completely absent its noticeably lower. For example I'm watching Champions League football right now the night before release and not an advert to be seen at half time.
Edit: I take all that back one just came on lol. Still nothing about gamepass mind you.
I guess sales don't really matter
Its out in around 5 hours. lol.When I was reading the quote, this is exactly what I was thinking.
This is the least amount of marketing I've EVER seen for COD in this last decade or so. It's always an event when COD launches every year. It's plastered everywhere - be it physical or digital media. Right now, I can't even remember the release date for BO6 off the top of my head.
Everything feels so muted this year.
By God, I genuinely thought it's sometime in November.Its out in around 5 hours. lol.
People need to realize that Game Pass has reached however many people it meant to reach.
- 2021 - "Bethesda's back-catalog will move the needle for Game Pass." -- It didn't.
- 2022 - "Halo Infinite will move the needle for Game Pass." -- It didn't.
- 2023 - "Starfield will move the needle for Game Pass." -- It didn't.
- 2024 - "COD BO6 will move the needle for Game Pass." -- It won't.
Gamepass only "doubled" because they rolled gold subs into it.What some weird bullshit to spout, in that time frame gamepass has more than doubled to 34 million.
Do you know how many more it will reach in the next 4 years? 10s of millions of more subscribers isn’t moving the needle? What is? 100 million?
"Doubled" (34 is not double of 25 lol!) only because they merged 2 services (GP + XBLG). And did you miss the fact that:What some weird bullshit to spout, in that time frame gamepass has more than doubled to 34 million.
Do you know how many more it will reach in the next 4 years? 10s of millions of more subscribers isn’t moving the needle? What is? 100 million?
I will quote myself from when the acquisition went through lol.I will quote myself from a month or so ago
Gamepass needs constant growth to sustain the developments of their first party games. GP not growing is probably the biggest reason why they are now porting their games to playstation.They do if they want to be even more profitable.
It's the age-old chicken and the egg problem.Gamepass needs constant growth to sustain the developments of their first party games. GP not growing is probably the biggest reason why they are now porting their games to playstation.
Phil has stated that Game Pass is sustainable and profitable as is. He mentioned that he doesn't ever anticipate it being greater than 10-15% of their content revenue.Gamepass needs constant growth to sustain the developments of their first party games. GP not growing is probably the biggest reason why they are now porting their games to playstation.
Phil Spencer says alot of things.Phil has stated that Game Pass is sustainable and profitable as is.
I guess sales don't really matter
Phil has stated that Game Pass is sustainable and profitable as is. He mentioned that he doesn't ever anticipate it being greater than 10-15% of their content revenue.
Microsoft tends to focus a lot of their advertising on digital avenues (things like Twitter account activity, Youtube Ads etc), but imo, that's not nearly as effective as doing irl and live sports advertising."Did you know a new “Call of Duty” game is launching this week?
If not, Microsoft would probably pay to find out where you’ve been hiding, because the tech giant has shelled out a marketing budget comparable to any “major motion picture blockbuster that would be launching this year,” according to Tyler Bahl, the chief marketing officer at “Call of Duty” studio Activision, to get “Black Ops 6” on every consumer’s radar"
Bullshit. When Sony had marketing rights COD was everywhere. While its its not completely absent its noticeably lower. For example I'm watching Champions League football right now the night before release and not an advert to be seen at half time.
Edit: I take all that back one just came on lol. Still nothing about gamepass mind you.
I guess sales don't really matter
Phil also said that Indiana Jones would be an Xbox exclusive and wasn't coming to PS5
He talks a lot, but nothing he says has a basis in reality
It's a downside because it is not on PS Plus.Don't see the downside to gamepass at all.
Warzone sucks. COD has been poor since anything after COD MW4.Cods been poor since MW 2019 the best mode is WARZONE which is free but even rebirth is stale now been playing WARHAMMER 4K breath of fresh air no hackers no chat bans it's like a game from the past.
But there was no mention of Game Pass on those.They literally had commercials in football games.
It's almost as if sales matter even if they try and twist the narrative to select media outlets.But there was no mention of Game Pass on those.
There were during the Packer games here in Wisconsin.But there was no mention of Game Pass on those.
It doesn't?How in the hell does Playstation make more money than Xbox from Call of Duty when Xbox owns Call of Duty?
Somebody please do this math for me
"Sales. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II became the fastest-selling Call of Duty game of all time. The game earned US$800 million in revenue in its first three days of release, and US$1 billion within 10 days, surpassing the series previous record-holders, 2011's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 and 2012's Black Ops II." - from WikipediaI don't get why that Destin guy would laugh at that excerpt. Black ink is referring to profits. One company takes all the risk and pays the dev / marketing cost. The other just takes a percentage of sales. I think a response of duh is more fitting than lol.
Anyway, how much Duty drives subs will be interesting to see play out. I'm not convinced it will be earth shattering but I've been wrong before.
Yeah that makes zero sense. I get you now."Sales. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II became the fastest-selling Call of Duty game of all time. The game earned US$800 million in revenue in its first three days of release, and US$1 billion within 10 days, surpassing the series previous record-holders, 2011's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 and 2012's Black Ops II." - from Wikipedia
If Black Ops 6 comes even close to this, there is no way what you're saying makes any sense. A billion dollars in 10 days? Microsoft gets 80% of sales on Playstation...wtf dude. The game costed between 250 and 300 mil to make.
I don't think people are referring to sales revenues when talking about black ink. In my mind black ink refers to profit."Sales. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II became the fastest-selling Call of Duty game of all time. The game earned US$800 million in revenue in its first three days of release, and US$1 billion within 10 days, surpassing the series previous record-holders, 2011's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 and 2012's Black Ops II." - from Wikipedia
If Black Ops 6 comes even close to this, there is no way what you're saying makes any sense. A billion dollars in 10 days? Microsoft gets 80% of sales on Playstation...wtf dude. The game costed between 250 and 300 mil to make.
I saw multiple BLOPS ads during games over the past two weekends and none of them showed any console logo or Game Pass.There were during the Packer games here in Wisconsin.
So if a game cost 300, let's say even 400 mil to make....that includes everything...marketing and development. however it makes a billion dollars within the first two weeks. That includes on xbox, playstation and pc...including gamepass subs, both current and new. You're saying that somehow, Sony makes more profit, just because they didn't have to market it or develop it....even though they only get 20% of all sales.I don't think people are referring to sales revenues when talking about black ink. In my mind black ink refers to profit.
With respect to profit, my understanding is Sony's revenue will essentially be pure profit (minus any overhead related to PSN expenses associated with the game). MS blank ink will be determined based on revenue, dev costs, post-launch support costs, and acquisition of the IP cost. I know the acquisition costs leaves room for debate when discussing profit. But I do not subscribe to the belief that it is irrelevant.
Yea I immediately thought of that quote when I saw this article. Good luck to MS I guess. I don't see how any service can possibly think one game is going to change things for them.
The way they are "marketing" BOPS6 for gamepass, I don't really think they want COD to move the needle. The game is too big for that. Devs like Larian knew best when they said no shot to gamepass because they knew what they had. This is another situation where Xbox is ok with mentioning it for those who are expecting COD to be on gamepass, but their true desire is to have as many people pay full price for the game out the gate. Xbox and PC gamepass users included.Phil himself said no one game will win them a generation. So I'm surprised they are thinking this one game will "move the needle" for GamePass.
Must be by location.I saw multiple BLOPS ads during games over the past two weekends and none of them showed any console logo or Game Pass.
No console or Game Pass mention on the officially released online version either.Must be by location.
No console or Game Pass mention on the officially released online version either.