Support NeoGAF

[SlimySnake]

Anyone getting Kingdom Come 2 here? some of the reviews look terrible, but the PC gamer review on the max settings looked excellent at times. really impressive draw distance on foliage and good mid day lighting which looks drab in other reviews but not here.

Good lord. What a gorgeous looking screenshot.

 

[Buggy Loop]

Ninja Gaiden 2 black's ending scene tells me that Team Ninja should continue with UE5. They got quite good with it.

I want more. Looks so so much better than NG4. The game is still cooking but I doubt it will surpass this.

 

[Radical_3d]

Marvelous! Thank fuck we have RT. Some smooth brain would suggest that a game that already has very high density areas like the forest could handle a planar reflection there. But no. Way better like this, with SpongeBob on the mirror.

 

[SlimySnake]

Ninja Gaiden 2 black's ending scene tells me that Team Ninja should continue with UE5. They got quite good with it.

I want more. Looks so so much better than NG4. The game is still cooking but I doubt it will surpass this.

good lighting but those rocks dont look nanite to me.

Marvelous! Thank fuck we have RT. Some smooth brain would suggest that a game that already has very high density areas like the forest could handle a planar reflection there. But no. Way better like this, with SpongeBob on the mirror.

its so dumb. TLOU2 and uncharted have them in ps4 games. several ps2 games had this. i dont care how expensive it might be to render things twice. you are in a tiny fucking dressing room. it cant be that expensive.

 

[Myuni]

Anyone getting Kingdom Come 2 here? some of the reviews look terrible, but the PC gamer review on the max settings looked excellent at times. really impressive draw distance on foliage and good mid day lighting which looks drab in other reviews but not here.

Though I didn't like some vegetation stuff I saw in a couple of previews, I'll certainly test it for 2 Steam-hours to get a personal impression.

 

[ProtoByte]

EA Motive ( Dead Space Remake and the upcoming Iron Man Game) is working on the Single Player for Battlefield which is described as a cinematic take on Battlefield. This should be fun.

Ooo. If they apply some of the large scale destruction to Iron Man it could be really good...

 

[kevboard]

Ninja Gaiden 2 black's ending scene tells me that Team Ninja should continue with UE5. They got quite good with it.

fuck UE5. many parts in the game look like absolute shit.

I'm happy that NG4 doesn't seem to be UE5 (someone claimed it is, but it absolutely doesn't look like it, so maybe they just don't use Lumen, which is good enough)

 

[kevboard]

Marvelous! Thank fuck we have RT. Some smooth brain would suggest that a game that already has very high density areas like the forest could handle a planar reflection there. But no. Way better like this, with SpongeBob on the mirror.

it's insane to me that game development these days is so fucked that they forgot how to do mirrors in small enclosed rooms.

the worst example for this was the hotline room in Control.
LITERALLY a black void, 4 walls, a table and a phone... and you get zero reflections if RT is disabled.

meanwhile Hitman 2 had a beach house at night with multiple massive windows with planar reflections and tons of interior detail reflected in them.

 

[Schmendrick]

They shadowdropped a Monster Hunter Wilds Benchmark on steam....
My old PC with a 5800x and an RTX 3080 got an average of 65fps with DLSS balanced at 5120 x 1440p without RT(seems only to be used for reflections)...not too bad, right?..... BUT half of that benchmark is running !!cutscenes!!......the parts where you have actual gameplay were in the mid 40s while looking like an "okay" PS4 game. And on top of that the IQ is still grainy soft garbage...
Haven`t tested it yet with my new 9800x3d/5080 rig because I wanted comparability to the beta.

Bottom line is that this benchmark didn`t run much better than the beta fps wise and the IQ and....well, everything else is still rather bad visually. So much for the optimization they touted....
RE Engine strikes again.

 

[SlimySnake]

They shadowdropped a Monster Hunter Wilds Benchmark on steam....
My old PC with a 5800x and an RTX 3080 got an average of 65fps with DLSS balanced at 5120 x 1440p without RT(seems only to be used for reflections)...not too bad, right..... BUT half of that benchmark is running !cutscenes!......the parts where you have actual gameplay were in the mid 40s while looking like a ~meh PS4 game. And on top of that the IQ is still grainy soft garbage...
Haven`t tested it yet with my new 9800x3d/5080 rig because I wanted comparability to the beta.

Bottom line is that this benchmark didn`t run much better than the beta fps wise and the IQ and....well, everything else is still rather bad visually.
RE Engine strikes again.

Could it be a cpu bottleneck during gameplay like the town center in dragons dogma 2? What was your gpu utilization during the gameplay benchmark?

I really don’t understand why these games are so heavy on the cpu.

 

[Buggy Loop]

good lighting but those rocks dont look nanite to me.

You can throw crap geometry in nanite. It takes a special kind of skillset to go into the kinds of assets we saw in Wukong.

I didn't stop to see if there was LOD problems in the game though. Seems like DF says that it uses nanite.

Anyway, the screenshot is still in a place where they should iterate upon and improve. Japan is having a hard time overall with graphics this gen to be honest.

 

[Schmendrick]

Could it be a cpu bottleneck during gameplay like the town center in dragons dogma 2? What was your gpu utilization during the gameplay benchmark?

I really don’t understand why these games are so heavy on the cpu.

at least in this benchmark it isn`t a CPU limit, or at least it doesn´t look like it. 98%+ GPU utilization vs ~40-60% CPU utilization.
In some parts with especially bad framerates though the GPU utilization drops into the low 80s while the CPU utilization is still in the 60s (I´ve only used the NVIDIA overlay and not a detailed per-core overlay, though)
But so far it seems to be the same inexplicable garbage people had in the beta where even 4090s coupled with x3d chips couldn`t get past certain fps threshholds despite the last gen visuals.

 

[SlimySnake]

at least in this benchmark it isn`t a CPU limit, or at least it doesn´t look like it. 98%+ GPU utilization vs ~40-60% CPU utilization.
In some parts with especially bad framerates though the GPU utilization drops into the low 80s while the CPU utilization is still in the 60s (I´ve only used the NVIDIA overlay and not a detailed per-core overlay, though)
But so far it seems to be the same inexplicable garbage people had in the beta where even 4090s coupled with x3d chips couldn`t get past certain fps threshholds despite the last gen visuals.

Yeah, same on my 3080. GPU utilization is maxed out at all times and at DLSS 4k balanced, it was dropping to the 40s in the open world region.

Still bangs my CPU hard but at least unlike Dragons Dogma 2, it was maxing out my GPU utilization. Game does have some decent lighting. Especially coming from FF7-2 and Kingdom Come 2. But the rocks and other world assets and texture look atrocious. This Monster Hunter team has always sucked. I mean they decided to make games on psp and 3ds so they arent exactly geniuses. Other than that, im just not seeing why this game is so taxing. Maybe RTGI on the RE Engine is too expensive?

 

[SlimySnake]

Bought Kingdom Come 2. Saw it on sale for $44 and figured what the hell.

It looks fairly similar to what we saw on youtube. But I am playing on DLSS Performance which despite what PC fanboys say, doesnt exactly look as sharp as 4k. Still, fairly decent textures, foliage and lighting. Sadly while the grass looks great, the trees and leaves dont look all that great from up close. They lack that next gen sheen of Avatar.

My biggest issue is the screenspace reflections. They are really bad in the first major cutscene which takes place next to a lake and you see all kinds of artifacts around the characters through out the cutscene. During gameplay its mostly fine but it did ruin this moment as I was admiring the beauty of the world.

Overall, I'd say that this is very much a RDR2.5 looking game. It does several things better, and has a very familiar look to RDR2, but it just doesnt quite have that next gen look. Still worth playing if you are a graphics whore and can stand hour long cutscenes, 15 minute brewing sessions and long drawn out sword battles.

P.S Indoor lighting looks good especially around fire. It doesnt have that fake feeling of HFW and other baked lighting games.

 

[yurinka]

The guy did two seasons of a tv show in the last 4 years since shipping TLOU2 instead of making video games. His studios, aimless without its CEO and the defacto Dictator, sorry Director, wasted nearly 5 years on last gen looking remakes and cancelled GaaS games.

Bullshit. During this time they released Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection, TLOUP1 remake, TLOU2 Remastered, the PC ports and in addition to working in TLOU Online they have been working in Interestellar and minimum another SP game.

Even if ignoring remasters, remakes and ports, they are/have been working on more games at the same time than ever before. But we are not in the PS1 days, the development cycles get longer each generation. Nowadays a big AAA takes around 5-9 years on average.

 

[kevboard]

They shadowdropped a Monster Hunter Wilds Benchmark on steam....
My old PC with a 5800x and an RTX 3080 got an average of 65fps with DLSS balanced at 5120 x 1440p without RT(seems only to be used for reflections)...not too bad, right?..... BUT half of that benchmark is running !!cutscenes!!......the parts where you have actual gameplay were in the mid 40s while looking like an "okay" PS4 game. And on top of that the IQ is still grainy soft garbage...
Haven`t tested it yet with my new 9800x3d/5080 rig because I wanted comparability to the beta.

Bottom line is that this benchmark didn`t run much better than the beta fps wise and the IQ and....well, everything else is still rather bad visually. So much for the optimization they touted....
RE Engine strikes again.

so not much better than the Beta then?
because the Beta also ran like garbage on everything.

RE engine just isn't made for open games like this. and the fact that Capcom seems to not have an alternative for it is alarming if they want to continue making more open world like titles.

 

[kevboard]

Bought Kingdom Come 2. Saw it on sale for $44 and figured what the hell.

It looks fairly similar to what we saw on youtube. But I am playing on DLSS Performance which despite what PC fanboys say, doesnt exactly look as sharp as 4k. Still, fairly decent textures, foliage and lighting. Sadly while the grass looks great, the trees and leaves dont look all that great from up close. They lack that next gen sheen of Avatar.

My biggest issue is the screenspace reflections. They are really bad in the first major cutscene which takes place next to a lake and you see all kinds of artifacts around the characters through out the cutscene. During gameplay its mostly fine but it did ruin this moment as I was admiring the beauty of the world.

Overall, I'd say that this is very much a RDR2.5 looking game. It does several things better, and has a very familiar look to RDR2, but it just doesnt quite have that next gen look. Still worth playing if you are a graphics whore and can stand hour long cutscenes, 15 minute brewing sessions and long drawn out sword battles.

P.S Indoor lighting looks good especially around fire. It doesnt have that fake feeling of HFW and other baked lighting games.

one of the rare modern games not running on Unreal Engine Shite... I mean 5...

Cryengine!
saving PC graphics since 2007

 

[Senua]

Bought Kingdom Come 2. Saw it on sale for $44 and figured what the hell.

It looks fairly similar to what we saw on youtube. But I am playing on DLSS Performance which despite what PC fanboys say, doesnt exactly look as sharp as 4k.

DLSS4?

 

[SlimySnake]

DLSS4?

Did it ship with it? I don’t know.

I tried dlss4 in other games and the 5-10% performance hit wasn’t worth it on my 3080.

 

[SlimySnake]

one of the rare modern games not running on Unreal Engine Shite... I mean 5...

Cryengine!
saving PC graphics since 2007

Actually crysis famously didn’t run well even on the top of the line cards back in the day. I bought a gtx 570 4 years later and even then i was cpu bound.

But back then we realized that greatness came at a cost. Rdr2 is praised to this day and that game couldn’t be maxed out at launch either.

 

[kevboard]

Actually crysis famously didn’t run well even on the top of the line cards back in the day. I bought a gtx 570 4 years later and even then i was cpu bound.

But back then we realized that greatness came at a cost. Rdr2 is praised to this day and that game couldn’t be maxed out at launch either.

Crysis didn't run well mainly due to the CPU utilisation being poor.

but even then, I played it on an Intel Core 2 Quad, and a 8600GT.
it ran decently fine, especially for how next gen it looked at the time.

But I am playing on DLSS Performance which despite what PC fanboys say, doesnt exactly look as sharp as 4k.

noone says that.
DLSS Quality mode looks like native, not performance mode.

Performance mode is usually still worth it at 4k I'd say, even tho it doesn't look as good as native

 

[Jack Howitzer]

It looks fairly similar to what we saw on youtube. But I am playing on DLSS Performance which despite what PC fanboys say, doesnt exactly look as sharp as 4k. Still, fairly decent textures, foliage and lighting. Sadly while the grass looks great, the trees and leaves dont look all that great from up close. They lack that next gen sheen of Avatar.

Ppl saying there are hidden console commands to unlock couple of these graphics parameters further.From my experience dlss quality seems quite decent and smooth . The closer range asset quality are still a bummer and nowhere near avatar quality ,hell it's a downgrade version indie jones at best but hey the overall foilage density and lighting atmosphere,color and scenery design certainly speaking for themselves.

And feels like lod popins are almost nowhere to be found so far which is a huge achievement comparing to these two imo,at least the opening sequence has the selling points (look at you xbox graphical popping masterpiece indie jones ). Coming from the janky indie rooted kcd1 I'm quite surprised xd

 

[PixelatedBeast]

Jesus, those clouds in the last screens are orgasmic. To think these are volumetric clouds in a day/night cycle open world game, to me it's amazing.

Compare these to FF7 static skybox, almost all games really, I mean you can't, there's no comparison. And I could run this max 4K on my mediocre Ryzen 5600x and RTX 4070.

Flying through those clouds at that fidelity was something else. First time I ever remember doing that in a video game, the DLC was amazing.

Pepople need to stop acting like the UE5 is the end all be all of next gen graphics. I rather have Decima Engine graphics than UE5 at 900p while struggling to reach 60fps. Its not worth it IMO, but I understand it help smaller or less talented studios punch above their weight.

 

[winjer]

Not exactly about graphics, but this is a very interesting video for anyone that might be of interest for anyone considering entering the industry.

 

[Senua]

Did it ship with it? I don’t know.

I tried dlss4 in other games and the 5-10% performance hit wasn’t worth it on my 3080.

Nope you have to force it. People are raving about the new transformer model, not the old CNN. It's well worth the slight performance loss. As you can just lower the DLSS quality mode and still have a better image.

 

[coachmcguirk91]

Well im not a fan of shooters at all so thats a huge slew of western gmaes that pretty much dont exist to me.

Yeah, very few Western games do hand to hand combat well. Off the top of my mind, the recent God of War games are the only Western franchise with great hand to hand combat. I find most shooters to be very repetitive.

It's one of the reasons I'm super excited for Intergalactic from Naughty Dog. Western studios are not developing games like that. You will get crazy good graphics and animations on a game emphasizing hand to hand combat. Also, whatever Sony Santa Monica is working on will probably not be a shooter either

 

[Gonzito]

I would gladly take games that look like Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 with a clean IQ, no ghosting or other shitty UE5 nasty effect and on top of that a good optimization with no stuttering.

Studios should start using Cry Engine more often in my opinion

Edit: please papito SlimySnake dont kill me for this take, I am unarmed

 

[SlimySnake]

Nope you have to force it. People are raving about the new transformer model, not the old CNN. It's well worth the slight performance loss. As you can just lower the DLSS quality mode and still have a better image.

Yeah those people are wrong or blind. i tried it in several games and the model cant yet handle foliage without massive flickering and shimmering. it reminds me of pssr its so fucking bad.

it might do some things right but all i noticed were flaws. that said, i will give it a shot in kingdom come 2. the foliage and IQ are not an issue in DLSS performance. I was simply pointing out why i dont sound too overly enthused about this game's graphics.... i.e., because im playing on dlss performance whereas i played black myth, silent hill 2, avatar and star wars outlaws at 4k dlss quality which always seem way sharper and much more detailed to me than dlss performance. i was basically trying to make an excuse for the game.

 

[SlimySnake]

I would gladly take games that look like Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 with a clean IQ, no ghosting or other shitty UE5 nasty effect and on top of that a good optimization with no stuttering.

Studios should start using Cry Engine more often in my opinion

Edit: please papito SlimySnake dont kill me for this take, I am unarmed

eh. its fine. There was a thread on era last night about how Demon Souls is still the best looking game on ps5, and there is something to be said about high resolutions, 60 fps and stable image quality. UE5 games cant do 60 fps and retain higher resolutions, and console gamers really want to play 60 fps modes where devs downgrade settings even further so at that point, if people think demon souls or kingdom come 2 look better, who am i to argue?

besides, like demon souls, pretty this game is using a realtime GI system. Just software based like UE5's Lumen. Starfield also uses realtime GI and i am a big fan of that game's visuals. of course, you are not getting nanite quality assets so that comes at a cost. it was not an issue in demon souls because its not an open world game so Bluepoint just went ham with the asset quality, but you can clearly tell that this game has last gen assets amidst some pretty impressive foliage draw distance.

Ppl saying there are hidden console commands to unlock couple of these graphics parameters further.From my experience dlss quality seems quite decent and smooth . The closer range asset quality are still a bummer and nowhere near avatar quality ,hell it's a downgrade version indie jones at best but hey the overall foilage density and lighting atmosphere,color and scenery design certainly speaking for themselves.

And feels like lod popins are almost nowhere to be found so far which is a huge achievement comparing to these two imo,at least the opening sequence has the selling points (look at you xbox graphical popping masterpiece indie jones ). Coming from the janky indie rooted kcd1 I'm quite surprised xd

really? i saw lod pop-in several times during the opening horse ride, and even when exploring the pond area where you first make camp. nothing major like horizon fw or even immersion breaking like its SSR reflections but its definitely there.

 

[SlimySnake]

This is disappointing. RTX mega geometry does fucking nothing.



Just a 300 mb difference in vram consumption. 11.1 gb to 10.8. Maybe 10% improvement in CPU performance though no one is playing at those low resolutions. And only 5-10% improvement on the gpu side. But only on the rtx 20 and 30 series cards. No improvement on 40 or 50 series cards.

It will be interesting to see how Nanite gets enhanced from this. Avowed is out soon. Then Expedition 33, mgs3 and maybe marvel's 1943 if it ever releases. Somehow i doubt that the difference in performance will be major.

 

[Jack Howitzer]

really? i saw lod pop-in several times during the opening horse ride, and even when exploring the pond area where you first make camp. nothing major like horizon fw or even immersion breaking like its SSR reflections but its definitely there.

I donno the opening playable area seems fine on my rig , gonna mess with more testing to give a final verdict that's for sure

 

[Jack Howitzer]

This is disappointing. RTX mega geometry does fucking nothing.



Just a 300 mb difference in vram consumption. 11.1 gb to 10.8. Maybe 10% improvement in CPU performance though no one is playing at those low resolutions. And only 5-10% improvement on the gpu side. But only on the rtx 20 and 30 series cards. No improvement on 40 or 50 series cards.

Ah the classic team green vram compression magic,ages as fine as another team green's fav console xbox series s,biting consumers and devs nonstop these days

 

[Polygonal_Sprite]

It looks fairly similar to what we saw on youtube. But I am playing on DLSS Performance which despite what PC fanboys say, doesnt exactly look as sharp as 4k. Still, fairly decent textures, foliage and lighting. Sadly while the grass looks great, the trees and leaves dont look all that great from up close. They lack that next gen sheen of Avatar.

It's quality mode they say that about. Performance mode is like what 900p native at 4k output. Quality mode is 1080p or 1440p native I think before it's DLSS'ed to 4k.

 

[rofif]

Anyone getting Kingdom Come 2 here? some of the reviews look terrible, but the PC gamer review on the max settings looked excellent at times. really impressive draw distance on foliage and good mid day lighting which looks drab in other reviews but not here.


Good lord. What a gorgeous looking screenshot.

AW2 is so mixed. It can look INCREDIBLE under right conditions

 

[GymWolf]

Playing kc2 maxed out on pc and hearing the exagerated praises to the graphic is giving me genital herpes

The vegetation is great from distance, but from up close all the flowers are super low quality and the models are just decent\good, the geometry is obviously not nanite tier and the texture work is very hit and miss, so i guess the lights are good? i'm not an expert, i could not recognise good lighting even if it hit me in the head with a path-traced mace.

The animations work and facial expressions are also pretty wonky.

 

[rofif]

Playing kc2 maxed out on pc and hearing the exagerated praises to the graphic is giving me genital herpes

The vegetation is great from distance, but from up close all the flowers are super low quality and the models are just decent\good, the geometry is obviously not nanite tier and the texture work is very hit and miss, so i guess the lights are good? i'm not an expert, i could not recognise good lighting even if it hit me in the head with a path-traced mace.

The animations work and facial expressions are also pretty wonky.

it's dry season. Nothing is coming out.
And on top of that this game is not woke.
So it's getting all the praise it can get, deserved or not feels like it.
I don't doubt it's a good game but no way in hell everyone on twitch would be playing it with other games around

 

[GymWolf]

it's dry season. Nothing is coming out.
And on top of that this game is not woke.
So it's getting all the praise it can get, deserved or not feels like it.
I don't doubt it's a good game but no way in hell everyone on twitch would be playing it with other games around

No i think the game is great if you want a realistic medieval simulator, it's very well written.

Maybe too slow sometimes and the combat is...one of the combat system of all time, and i stop there

 

[SlimySnake]

Playing kc2 maxed out on pc and hearing the exagerated praises to the graphic is giving me genital herpes

The vegetation is great from distance, but from up close all the flowers are super low quality and the models are just decent\good, the geometry is obviously not nanite tier and the texture work is very hit and miss, so i guess the lights are good? i'm not an expert, i could not recognise good lighting even if it hit me in the head with a path-traced mace.

The animations work and facial expressions are also pretty wonky.

I think it's because the game does look good. Just not next gen like we want games to look in this thread. So your average gamer who holds RDR2 as the bar sees something like this which at times does look better, and they think its next gen.

I brought up Demon Souls earlier. Same thing. I called it PS4.5 in this thread like 3 years ago, but people truly believe its the best looking game on PS5 still.

 

[SlimySnake]

it's dry season. Nothing is coming out.
And on top of that this game is not woke.
So it's getting all the praise it can get, deserved or not feels like it.
I don't doubt it's a good game but no way in hell everyone on twitch would be playing it with other games around

this is true. The game is so poorly paced that it makes me want to slit my wrists from boredom. People just trash (and rightfully so) sony exclusives for their constant walking segments, but here? GOTY. And its far far worse than anything in GOW or Spiderman 2 which are the worst when it comes to those forced walking segments.

I just had the main credits roll after a 3 hour intro where the biggest fight i had was a 1v1 fight. After the so called opening credits, we had another hour long cutscenes and dialogue sequences before I finally got to see the open world. At least dragon age started off with a bang and had constant gameplay even if the storytelling was weak. And btw, the storytelling here and the cutscene direction/character models are mid at best. Something similar to maybe Insomniac, Sucker Punch and GG's PS3 era efforts. They are literally two gens behind sony when it comes to storytelling. its all so fucking boring.

And yet PC gamers are going to pretend this is the greatest thing since slice bread. Just like how PS gamers pretended FF7 Rebirth's constant mini games werent fucking torture. People are hypocrites.

 

[Buggy Loop]

This is disappointing. RTX mega geometry does fucking nothing.



Just a 300 mb difference in vram consumption. 11.1 gb to 10.8. Maybe 10% improvement in CPU performance though no one is playing at those low resolutions. And only 5-10% improvement on the gpu side. But only on the rtx 20 and 30 series cards. No improvement on 40 or 50 series cards.

It will be interesting to see how Nanite gets enhanced from this. Avowed is out soon. Then Expedition 33, mgs3 and maybe marvel's 1943 if it ever releases. Somehow i doubt that the difference in performance will be major.

I guess he had to pick low PT for even making the 2000 series enter the arena but otherwise, there's videos showing +13% even in the city on 4000 series. I imagine the forest is higher gain. Kind of hard to estimate as there's not a lot of peoples benching this, with 5000 series trickling in. But DF's video is kind of at odds with other observations. >1GB saved at 4k DLAA

 

[SlimySnake]

So what do we think? Next gen worthy? Would this game land in the top 10 for this gen?

Again. Ignore the shimmering in the gif. IQ is perfect ingame.

 

[TronNerd82]

Maybe my standards are just low, but I still think PS2 games still look high-def. Love the look of SpongeBob Battle for Bikini Bottom, and Driver Parallel Lines. It doesn't take much to impress me.

 

[dok1or]

So what do we think? Next gen worthy? Would this game land in the top 10 for this gen?

Again. Ignore the shimmering in the gif. IQ is perfect ingame.

Playing it on PRO and draw distance is very good; few days ago I have finishe first part on PC and LOD i same if not better than moded PC version. And it runs smooth.

Player and vegetation interaction is better than i n first one.

 

[mrqs]

So what do we think? Next gen worthy? Would this game land in the top 10 for this gen?

Again. Ignore the shimmering in the gif. IQ is perfect ingame.

Looks ok I guess.

 

[kevboard]

So what do we think? Next gen worthy? Would this game land in the top 10 for this gen?

Again. Ignore the shimmering in the gif. IQ is perfect ingame.

and all it took is not being made in UE5

meanwhile every other developer: "hey! let's throw all our engines into the trash and use that shitty engine over there!"

 

[Myuni]

So what do we think? Next gen worthy? Would this game land in the top 10 for this gen?

Again. Ignore the shimmering in the gif. IQ is perfect ingame.

Not next gen, but this gif looks good.
Except for the petals painted onto the wiggling transparent cardboards in the foreground.
I know I'm a stickler, but I can't help myself

 

[alloush]

 

[GymWolf]

So what do we think? Next gen worthy? Would this game land in the top 10 for this gen?

Again. Ignore the shimmering in the gif. IQ is perfect ingame.

Lmao, Definitely not top 10.

Gif format making games looking better since 1993.

Then you get close to those flawers...

 

[Radical_3d]

Ha! I remember MLiD saying you’d be fine with a 3060 for the rest of the generation before it was announced. Not the card’s fault but modern gaming shittyness but still…

 

[SimTourist]

Lmao, Definitely not top 10.

Gif format making games looking better since 1993.

Then you get close to those flawers...

It's top 10 by virtue of there only being 10 proper currentgen games overall