DeadOblivion78
Banned
I can see Nintendo laughing at their bum ass of the thought of Microsoft trying to buy them.
"true agenda" lol. You're acting like Phil is a generic moustache twirling villain whose evil plan to take over fhe world has been leaked.
It’s no secret how Microsoft deals with competition.
This. But some people on this board don't want to understand that. They want drama instead.They probably knew since forever, those people are very smart businessmen and I'm pretty sure this seemed to them like a manual tactic
I love how you mentioned literally every current system right now that you supposedly own, in your first reply. I call BS on no bias.
Also, if you want to be less obvious, wait for at least a few replies before you try to cover yourself.
So the OP's web browser history consists of "Hermine Harry Potter Cosplay Porn Pornhub" cool, another individual exposed. Round them up. @German Hops @kanjobazooie Skelterz Who's next on the exposed list?
The email is someone aksing Phil about Nintendo, and him basically saying "owning Nintendo at somepoint in the future would be cool, here's my thoughts on the matter".
They don't actually plan on acquiring Nintendo any time soon, therefore there's nothing Nintendo needs to do.
Nintendo could buy its own shares as a protective measure. That's how Guillemot defended Ubisoft from Vivendi's attempted hostile take over a couple of years ago.Well they can't prevent companies buying shares.
This. I wonder why people seem to think that Nintendo's upper mangement and board of directors is made up of naive idiots. There are many people there who have studied this whole business bullshit. There are people there who have been at it longer than most of the people on this board were alive. Fucking hell, Yamauchi himself built Nintendo up again also by scheming and shrewd business deals.Nintendo probably have an eye on who is buying larger number of shares anyway. Nintendo will not be outplayed here.
Lol, never really thought about it before but "X" means no/negative in Japan (there's that thing about the playstation O and X buttons having the opposite functions in Japan).
X means no in most places isn't it? even the unicode for the no gesture is going to show you an X.Lol, never really thought about it before but "X" means no/negative in Japan (there's that thing about the playstation O and X buttons having the opposite functions in Japan).
It's kind of funny how Xbox literally means the No-box.
If they lean into it with their streaming/cloud technology it could actually work in their favor whereas before it probably didn't.
I understand the sentiment but the way he describes going about it is underhanded, Irresponsible also to leave that type of narrative residue in email form regardless if it’s peer to peer, The whole thing stinksThis is a joke thread.
If you were the CEO of any company, ofcourse you have contemplated and tried to get everything under you.
It's freaking Microsoft. This is why their CEOs are paid to expand their business with new ideas.
Why do you expect any reaction? Nintendo has known this for years. Any sane business person knows that large companies with a gaming interest would love to buy Nintendo. This is a giant nothingburger that people are blowing out of proportion just like with the comment about Xbox leaving gaming if non xbox revenue does not increase more than what some internal team estimated.I’m pretty shocked by the leaks it’s been a few days now but one thing I just can’t shake is the hubris of Phil Spencer, The fact he genuinely believes Nintendo would be better off under the Microsoft banner is laughable to me but I want to know what everyone else thinks.
In light of this information how should Nintendo react.
Nintendo's share buyback wasn't big enough to stave off a secret hostile takeover or devaluation by an agency working on behalf of Microsoft. It represented less than 1% of the company's shares. Share buybacks don't protect against that kind of thing anyway. They likely did it to protect the value of their assets considering the devaluation of their pile of cash amid global inflation.Actually this is a situation where it's more than Microsoft simply wanting to buy Nintendo. They have a partner that has acted as a proxy that is buying shares to get a position on their board so they can push for market expansion, effectively putting them at risk of devaluing the company.
IIRC, Nintendo did buy back about $400 million of shares last year. This could have been a reaction to Microsoft's partner.
I stand correctedSuck a dick pal.
It is technically possible, but I find it very unlikely that ValueAct would be able to persuade Nintendo management to sell to Microsoft.There is a lot of "Nintendo wont sell" or "They laughed at Microsoft the last time they tried to purchase them" type posts.
Most seem unaware that Phil Spencer, in emails spoke of how they can purchase Nintendo. They're using a Venture Capitalist firm, which their ex board of directors is now the ceo of. The firm is called: ValueAct And Microsoft has a way into Nintendo via the purchasing of Nintendo shares. Microsoft already has influence to the tune of 1.1 Billion worth of Nintendo stock.
Thinking it's not possible is a mistake. It is in fact a Market reality via this method...
Exclusive: ValueAct eyes Nintendo with stake of over $1.1 billion - letter
Activist investor ValueAct Capital Partners LP has built a stake of over $1.1 billion in Nintendo, according to a letter seen by Reuters, a bet that digital software distribution and the development of new entertainment products will fuel growth at the Japanese gaming company.www.reuters.com