I'm nobody
Member
By laughing there arse off
It is technically possible, but I find it very unlikely that ValueAct would be able to persuade Nintendo management to sell to Microsoft.
Plus ValueAct might not even be currently doing that.
It's okay to say you hate a company.
I have two switches and still hate Nintendo, specifically how cheap they are with their games.
Again it’s pretty obvious by now Microsoft like buying company’s, it’s the manner of which there setting out to do so. it’s not enough for them to know Nintendo have zero interest in being bought out or merging there trying to go about it using stock market force which is highly questionable behaviour in my opinion.Wow, shocked that a company wants to buy another one
I think the more companies that can remain independent and competitive the more healthy the gaming landscape for everyone to be honest. The last thing you want is a monopoly because then your at the mercy of whatever bullshit gets set out by few major companies left.Sell to Apple to spite Microsoft
The purpose of ValueAct isn't to convince them, it's to coerce them into a position where they are easier to buy. That's what makes it so nefarious. In one long sentence:It is technically possible, but I find it very unlikely that ValueAct would be able to persuade Nintendo management to sell to Microsoft.
Plus ValueAct might not even be currently doing that.
But even if they got them to that position, they would still have to persuade Nintendo management to be bought right? Since Phil rules out a hostile takeover.The purpose of ValueAct isn't to convince them, it's to coerce them into a position where they are easier to buy. That's what makes it so nefarious. In one long sentence:
"If we can't buy you, we will use a long-game plan through proxies to buy shares who will use their clout to pressure you into overextending into a weak money-shedding position, so we can buy you"
But they would still have to persuade Nintendo management to be bought right? Since Phil rules out a hostile takeover.
Nintendo lives in their own bubble and can do what they want.
Pretty sure Nintendo's massive cash reserves are there to prevent a hostile takeover....it's been reacting and not "doing what it wants" for yearsNintendo doesn't need to react.
Pretty sure Nintendo's massive cash reserves are there to prevent a hostile takeover....it's been reacting and not "doing what it wants" for years
"I want the money of investors but I don't want to be bought."Nintendo could buy its own shares as a protective measure. That's how Guillemot defended Ubisoft from Vivendi's attempted hostile take over a couple of years ago.
Nintendo could also poison pill the company if there was a take over. So that the buyer ends up with a damaged, useless husk of a company. Or some other baggage.
Partner with Sony for real this time.
Common sentiment."I want the money of investors but I don't want to be bought."
Amazing the fanboying on this.
An agenda? To what, get better? Duh...that's the fucking point, right? Think most people on here just want MS to eternally stay in 3rd place and be happy being dominated for decades to come. MS can never have a win. Fuck that.
If u actually read the quotes around this topic (and Steam) l, they said they would never go thru it but if the opportunity opened up.
We're all in agreement that MS is in 3rd place for 1st party games. They need help....and they have more money than God...so nothing id off the table for them. They are in a different league than Sony or Nintendo. They could buy both and it'd be barely a blip on their quarterly. They just spent $70B in ABK yet the valuation on the IP alone came back at $100B.
Surely they'd want Nintendo's development strength intact no? From Phil's email he thinks Nintendo's future is putting games on other people's hardware, so I guess he want them making strong, exclusive games for Xbox and PC (on Gamepass of course).I see many roadblocks to it realistically happening, but if they actually sabotaged/weakened Nintendo enough from the inside over the long game, you never know. I don't really see MS owning Nintendo as we know it. I see them owning a former shell of Nintendo that owns all the characters, or just the rights.
For example you could see Konami either getting bought or selling all their IP as they go down. But I just don't see any world where MS owns a Nintendo that is conducting development of real games in Japan...and I doubt MS wants that part of it anyway. They would love a weak cheap sabotaged/desperate Nintendo however and are actively trying to create that
They won't be able to react. MS's goal is to coerce them via their BoD. They go the shares back from ValueAct, but that won't be the last time MS drives at Nintendo. As long as MS is in gaming, Nintendo is in their crosshairs.
Sony and Nintendo are like the Metallica and megadeth of the metal world, on one hand you can’t help but imagine the possibilities but on the other you have two great bands making there version of thrash.
Someone is going to have to translate this one...not sure what it is trying to say.Amazing the fanboying on this.
An agenda? To what, get better? Duh...that's the fucking point, right? Think most people on here just want MS to eternally stay in 3rd place and be happy being dominated for decades to come. MS can never have a win. Fuck that.
If u actually read the quotes around this topic (and Steam) l, they said they would never go thru it but if the opportunity opened up.
We're all in agreement that MS is in 3rd place for 1st party games. They need help....and they have more money than God...so nothing id off the table for them. They are in a different league than Sony or Nintendo. They could buy both and it'd be barely a blip on their quarterly. They just spent $70B in ABK yet the valuation on the IP alone came back at $100B.
I'm not an expert on the Japanese law on these things, but I'm fairly certain it would illegal for Nintendo to own 51% of their own shares.Well, for one, make sure they own 51% of their stock moving forward. Even though MS said a hostile takeover would look bad for them, it doesn't mean they won't do it. And now we also know that they've been using a proxy to buy up as many Nintendo shares as possible to use as leverage in the future.
The Saudi PIF fund is the largest holder of Nintendo stock outside of Japan. It is over 10%. But not too far over.I'm not an expert on the Japanese law on these things, but I'm fairly certain it would illegal for Nintendo to own 51% of their own shares.
It'll be around 10% max