I've seen that here too as well. Is the thread On Topic, that's the question behind it. Derailing threads is common, but sometimes going off topic is because the main topic has run its course. If it has not and there is contention between main topic and off topic then another thread is called for to split those discussions.
In any case, being on topic or not does not an echo chamber make.
Ah yes, eternal September, I regret it and I was born after it. We really do need to make netiquette be required in schools. Here is how to get maximum use of forum conversations, how to not click banner ads, how to think critically, how to reply against ideas not personalities, how to see the best interpretation of posts, and when to spot and stop feeding a troll, etc.one of these days I'm going to write up a bunch of screens and publish them as a nonfiction book.
I agree we have been going in circles at best. And when you are going the wrong direction, turning backwards is the first step to going the right direction. Does that mean you go backwards all the way to where you started? No! But you do need to make some changes somewhere or else you end up right back here in this (currently left hand) dead end alley.
Postmodernism, insufficient advocacy for change is automatically supporting the evil oppressor status quo. I think western society at large is getting sick of the obnoxiousness of this worldview. I at least am.
Yeah postmodern arguments is only too willing to take liberal discussions and norms and use them against those well meaning classical liberals to try to advance their agenda. Just like how certain cultures have a "do unto others before they do unto you, if they are stupid enough to fall for it then that is on them". It's un-Christian behavior but even for those for whom that word is an allergic word, it's an un-charitable toxic behavior that corrodes basic societal trust and is therefore to be condemned even if you set aside the religious take on it as I expect (without evidence) most of thr members here would prefer.
I echo this, people express dismay at how the objects of their enjoyment are not only no longer targeted at them (meh we wish otherwise perhaps if we have good memories of a franchise), but weaponized against them and targeted at fictiously inflated parts of society called "the modern audience" so the creators of the newly targeted content can preen about how fashionable they are.
We don't want fashionable, we want good product!
Thanks for sharing this true and underappreciated view here in the West. I got to spend a year in a former Soviet country and while I only got to interact with those who spoke English, they were staunchly what would today be called anti woke because they apparently saw where what at the time we called political correctness was going.
Agreed, there can be too much attraction to woke stuff from a hate standpoint, it's worth remembering there are other aspects of games to talk about besides just how high the woke meter goes.
Everyone thought Dolores umbridge was a moral majority Bible thumper and it turns out she was just a time traveling mod from a certain purple site!
This is the meta discussion and I agree wokeness is a big tool of subversion today, but I'm not going to get into it beyond that because I know this is a gaming site not a politics site and I don't want to take things too off topic.
Being fair and balanced and looking at the ideas is well and good.
But I caution that we don't put that too high on a pedestal. I don't want what has happened in the past to other forums (where people took this attitude overboard and stuck with it so long that it chased away the point of the site itself in the name of looking polite) to happen to NeoGAF.
I joined here because this sites tone reminds me of my 06 heydays and I'm not wanting to be trapped with no choices except the Case Colt Ingersoll grandpas and the Agora Rd catboys (though you will find I have accounts on both sites), So I want to preserve the neutral tone where the focus is the games themselves, with proper discussion on even unpopular points of view without heavy-handed banning.
That is not and should not be seen as incompatible with having us be welcoming and cordial to users especially those with viewpoints we agree to disagree with.
I agree with this being the win. I'm new enough on the site that I don't know if the site is getting that win or not but I plan to continue trying to get us there or at least to do my part to do so.
I agree with your post, I would say this as "all private groups are characterized by common ground" such as in this case a shared viewpoint. An echo chamber is a phenomenon where one only ever sees agreeing opinions that reinforce your existing world view, I would not say that this site is that one-sided currently, So for the sake of being pedantic I would say that common ground is more precise than echo chamber.
I agree and I hope we all continue to appreciate the site culture being what it is and continue to help it move into a better future without falling to the left hand or the right.
Agreed! I looked here for about a week before opening an account just to see what the controversial discussions looked like and I liked what I saw.
Postmodernism is caustic to our modernist worldview and these are some of its children, and while I agree with your posts point, I won't add to it to try to stay on topic (is gaf too one sided in anti woke) vs the broader (why woke is bad).
And potentially sealioning, but until the OP insistently repeats their points whilst ignoring our rebuttals, I'm not seeing that on my mental radar just yet. But if they are, then we stop engaging and feeding the trolls....but my troll I meter hasn't gone off yet, though I am watching it like Spock does his tricorder, looking for troll signs.
I agree, it's the "low quality and expecting that because the subject of the low quality work is a favored or fashionable totem right now, it is therefore beyond criticism and you are required to support it and love it and advance it, anyone who gets in the way of the glorious revolution is therefore tarnished" toxic phenomenon which is what this site rebels against (from what I have seen so far) more than direct animus of the fashionable totems themselves.