To be fair they've been advertising a hell out for WiiU recently in Japan, and you just saw the result.
Wow, they did? I mean, how much is "hell out"?
To be fair they've been advertising a hell out for WiiU recently in Japan, and you just saw the result.
lolYeah and some people are like. Why is Persona 5 not for PS4? lol.
I wonder if it'll be a much better idea for NCL to swap the console side of their business for a Steam like infracture and then create a handheld top notch enough to play all from the NES to the WiiU...
A competitively priced new portable system which also plays all WiiU titles (digital), and has TV-out and controller support.
Mario 3D is seemingly:
- The best Mario game since Mario 64
- The best game of 2013 (amongst a strong list)
Expectations are high.
Done in Japan? If it was selling 500 a week like the og Wii right now I would agree with you. Nintendo just needs to continue to bring out great games consistently like they just promised for the entire 2014 calendar year and the sales for Wii U will be more consistent.
Herein lies a problem. As evidenced by Mario's less than stellar sales, people are really caring more about graphics than gameplay. Mario is, according to nearly everyone who played it, one of the greatest games they have played in a long while, yet it will be shunned. Why? It's a great game...it's just not the current cinematic stuff that floods the industry.
Your bar for "done" is 500 units a week? This is an incredibly low bar. Far below the sales of other systems which died early deaths.
Just posting because this is somehow unprecedented. Nintendo's home system ecosystem totally collapsed. I don't think many actually realize how crazy is this scenario. Even by considering Wii was based on casual audience - going from 100+ million system sold to....few millions is incredible.
It's obviously the combination of many factors, that reinforce each other negatively, including (a) price and little flexibility in dropping it; (b) lack of games; (c) long times between major releases; (d) total lack of third parties; (e) lack of proper online infrastructure; (f) lack of a major interest in the tablet, since tables are everywhere around us; (g) bad word of mouth by gamers and press; (h) lack of proper marketing; (i) confusion because of the name - people think it's a Wii extension somehow; (l) lack of innovation - the system doesn't bring anything interesting or different like, e.g. the Wiimote (this point is particularly incredible - coming from Nintendo especially).
Nintendo made all possible mistakes that could have been made - I can understand gambling on some of these factors, but hitting the negative target on each single of them is a total lack of proper R&D consumer research and system development. It's lack of professional attitude. Wii U was launched on the hype of the iPad and not considering the volatility and competition of is latter market, where everything gets copied really fast, consumer changes product every year and innovation vanish so quickly. Not a good basis for introducing a 5+ year home system. Nintendo's execs overestimated themselves because of DS and Wii's overwhelmingly successes - which, yes, were well targeted and constructed products, but that also benefitted from a certain fraction of coincidences and opportunism. Nevertheless, it's alright to recognize Nintendo's merits with DS and Wii - I think they offset what came from pure luck. Too bad this blinded them considerably afterwards.
Is this Iwata's responsibility? Yes it is, although it's cheap to say "it's all his fault". It's obvious people around him are as guilty as Iwata of being blinded toward the market's requirements. The reason of this failure is, beyond many other factors, that Iwata is a developer and not a businessman - and now this appears extremely clear. As much as he's really, extremely good in making teams below him produce high quality games and improve over time (yes, we can still say that, right?), he lacks skills for conducting proper business.
Ironically, what Nintendo need in reality is not to Iwata to step down, but a person to stay above Iwata and take care of the business part of the company. But I prefer not to give suggestions here.
Regardless of that, Iwata said that he would consider drastic measures for Wii U after Christmas figures..... There is little to do now, the tragic variables conditioning Wii U's ecosystem can be changed partially and the core of the disaster remain.
One possibility is to (a) offer a low price, tablet free Wii U package. Likely and doable, since we have the example of 2DS, which completely ditched the 3D effect. The price was very aggressive and marketed young audience - the one Nintendo always have been more successful, because of their IPs. This would help expanding the userbase and would maybe also bring back some of third parties multiplatform games (but I'm not betting on that).
Or (b), get rid of Wii U and announce another home system launching at the end of 2014. But this is less likely, for the simple reason they never be ready. They weren't even for Wii U's launch - a new system next year? LOL. Nintendo is a small company, but not as small to deviate the ship from the current path. However, they can take bigger and faster adjustments than other companies like introducing consistent modification of the current system.
Wii U clearly is a failure, but it would be nice to have it profitable eventually. In the meantime Nintendo will hopefully learn something and start thinking on the next home system.
It actually puts them in a rather tasty position for their next box, as in the next few years we'll see some fairly big advancements in low wattage/high power parts and they should be able to comfortably trump ps4 without breaking the bank.
Question for you- what games are the kids talking about getting if they aren't interested in SM3D World? I'm confused what would get them excited about the system right now if SM3D World isn't it.
Vita would finally be King and we'd finally have a proper MH game and more games in general tbh
But it's nice to dream sometimes I guess
2D Mario. Not kidding. And 2 boys said Pikmin 3 of all things. Wii Party came up a few times too and that is unsurprising, it's been advertised to hell and back.
I think thats part of the problem. The new bundles come with enough games to keep people content until Mario Kart.
13./14. [WIU] New Super Mario Bros. U # <ACT> (Nintendo) {2012.12.08} (¥5.985) - 18.072 / 638.755 <80-100%> (+42%)
Is there a bundle of this in Japan? It would certainly move during the December period.
That.....that's a very interesting concept. Surely they could do that by 2015 from a visual perspective.
Wii U seemed to be a promising console at first, it is too bad most of its games are bombas.
Vita TV is the new PSP go?
Indeed a very interesting concept - Gaffers have been pitching this, in various forms and guises, for the last year on the forum, it just makes more and more sense as we see the Wii U crumble.
That's what I've been saying for like half a year, although I have compared it to iOS on iPhone/iPod/iPad. Something like this:
Handheld with hardware that acts as baseline
Console with stronger hardware that uprenders to 1080p and supports local multiplayer
every game cross-play
Hopefully whoever takes over after Iwata is gone pushes for this.I've also mentioned many times now that NoA & NoE also need to be given autonomy over their respective regions, set up similarly to NCL (in terms of dev teams) and allowed to help with software output. Something that should have happened years ago. NCL can't keep doing it all by themselves.
Packed into basically every Wii U sold. Hence the discussion on the bundle actually hurting SM3D World adoption.
You are overestimating the cost of the PS4 and greating underestimating the cost of the Wii U.
Wii U has the worst cost-to-performance ratio seen in a long time. It's truely a marvel how badly designed and engineered the Wii U is at a cost-to-performance perspective.
Unfortunately, the system isn't selling well.Isn't it more important just to sell systems? If 2D Mario is selling, then they should sell as many systems as possible.
I've also mentioned many times now that NoA & NoE also need to be given autonomy over their respective regions, set up similarly to NCL (in terms of dev teams) and allowed to help with software output. Something that should have happened years ago. NCL can't keep doing it all by themselves.
By march 2014 the shipment will be more than 2M.I was thinking the other day chances are Mario 3D World will sell LESS than 2 million globally.
The line of reasoning as always been somewhat odd, considering the system launched with NSMBU.But when Wii U sales have been super low and we've heard for ages that it's because "the big guns" aren't out yet
There's the 100 billion yen question.If not even Nintendo's big IPs can boost HW sales by at least a decent amount, what will?
I've never understood this slippery slope argument, GTA: San Andreas goes to iOS and henceforth Take-Two will need to price GTA games at iOS prices?And now you can't sell your other games for more than 5 $, because people are used to it.
It's a product that seemingly has been produced without any particular target market, without basic market validation, and as such is very fundamentally flawed.The ideology that Wii U is so fundamentally flawed that no matter what software they would release for it tomorrow it still wouldn't make it sell well is quite ridiculous.
A competitively priced new portable system which also plays all WiiU titles (digital), and has TV-out and controller support.
Man, I can't wait for that January NCL briefing now. Time for a complete change in management (though whether we get it is another story).
Ouch @ SM3DW.
Ouch @ WIIU.
Ouch @ Vita.
Ouch @ FFXIII.
I hope SM3DW has long legs or else home console gaming is really dead in Japan. Why would PS4 sell over there?
I think the biggest damage inflicted on the WiiU is that there is no reason for anyone to really get a WiiU, even if you're a Nintendo fan. The 3DS library is sufficient for most people, and we talk about the biggest mainstream titles on the WiiU - 2D Mario, 3D Mario, Mario Kart, Donkey Kong, Monster Hunter, and Smash Brothers.... guess what? Nintendo is offering all those experiences on the 3DS too, sometimes before it even hits the WiiU. It's really hard to build any sort of audience on a home console when everything people would want to play with it are available elsewhere on a system with more support from other developments, and there's nothing really unique or outstanding on the system itself.
Hopefully whoever takes over after Iwata is gone pushes for this.
Oh absolutely. It won't happen any time soon under Nintendo's current corporate structure and philosophy though.
I think this is reaching... gamers just don't care enough about the Wii U in totality IMO. It sold 20k units on the week of a fantastic 3D Mario game. I think it's dead in the water.Another strike against Nintendo is the amount of used WiiUs flooding the shops. This week there might actually be 40k new WiiU owners but if I was buying a WiiU in Japan right now I'd buy used. The consoles are mint and a lot cheaper.
This is what hurt the 360. Every time there was a big new title like Blue Dragon the gamers bought used consoles and then sold them back afterwards. This stuffed the used shop channels and drove the used price even lower due to more supply than demand. Its a vicious cycle.
Yes, I am comparing Nintendo to Microsoft in Japan. This is not a good thing.
However if they can have a good holiday (something Nintendo is traditionally strong at and Microsoft is not) they can clear out some of the used inventory giving people more incentive to buy new.
All hope is not lost, but if they screw up the next months and not stabilize their baseline BEFORE Mario Kart, then this same pattern is likely to repeat.
And what would that actually accomplish? It'd put the company in further turmoil and potentially end up destroying it because the new person in charge may decide to capitulate to shareholders and go iOS or third party.
Iwata4lyfe, yo is clearly a much better plan.And what would that actually accomplish? It'd put the company in further turmoil and potentially end up destroying it because the new person in charge may decide to capitulate to shareholders and go iOS or third party.
[PS3] Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII <RPG> (Square Enix) {2013.11.21} (¥7.770) - 277.082 / NEW