The Vita's first year was a total trainwreck, it took more than a full year to reach one million.
No it didn't.
The Vita's first year was a total trainwreck, it took more than a full year to reach one million.
Right. If we include spinoffs then DQ Monsters as well. Also things like Kingdom Hearts or Fire Emblem if we delve into subgenres.Mario & Luigi is pretty competitive too on the Tales level.
Is it a good idea to burn their Sony audience with an obvious beta release? I'm not sure.
I wouldn't be surprised if Fire Emblem and Bravely are also bigger than Tales in the future. Xillia seems like the outlier now.
If anyone here is in Boston my school is hosting a weekly meet up and tournament this Saturday. Lmk if you're interested.
Not really a beta release. I was saying that Tales of Zestiria will just include a future arc like Graces coming almost a year later. Lot of games do this in, in fact I would say fans would jump on that quickly if Alisha's character progression is rectified.
ps4 will struggle to keep up with vita numbers, people should take it easy on the wii u overtaking.
The DLC scenario already seems to be taking place after the main game...
Lmao holy shit, I have no idea how I posted that in this thread.
Really?
Welp. I don't know what Namco can do to rectify this situation then. Maybe one day we will learn why they did it.
Layton 7 says hiyaIsn't it kind of crazy that Breath of Fire 6 was announced in August 2013 and still isn't out yet? How many phone/browser games have a dev cycle that long?
Really?
Welp. I don't know what Namco can do to rectify this situation then. Maybe one day we will learn why they did it.
Layton 7 says hiya
Not really a beta release. I was saying that Tales of Zestiria will just include a future arc like Graces coming almost a year later. Lot of games do this in, in fact I would say fans would jump on that quickly if Alisha's character progression is rectified.
Isn't it kind of crazy that Breath of Fire 6 was announced in August 2013 and still isn't out yet? How many phone/browser games have a dev cycle that long?
Money. Why else? I mean, they're even doing pre-order mystic artes now.
they didn't expect the fallout to be this bad
they expected mad dlc $$$
It still has the end result of telling people "Don't buy the first version", which could negatively affect future entries.
1 year is a suitable amount of time to stop that notion, especially now that we get a Tales nearly every year.
Famitsu tracks approx. 3,600 participating stores across Japan who send in sales data on a regular basis.
Media Create tracks more than 3,000 stores across Japan the same way.
Both companies extrapolate out to the rest of the Japanese market they don't directly track using proprietary algorithms.
Neither company is a perfect tracker of the Japanese market.
Famitsu has more historical data available (they're older) and tracks a few hundred more stores...but Media Create probably has more major customers in the video game industry...but Famitsu is partnered with NPD and GfK...etc.
Media Create's major customers:
Nintendo
Sony
Microsoft
Square Enix
Capcom
Konami
Bandai Namco
Sega
Electronic Arts
Dentsu Inc.
Other major publishers / developers / researchers
Basically, you can go back and forth with the two. It's best to just look at both sets of numbers and respect them equally.
Personally, Famitsu is my favourite.
It's probably best to move on to the next game.
Im very curious to see the effect of the ps3/vita over the sales of the ps4 versions. When people list the upcoming games, theres no doubt its a great lineup, but most of it is also coming on the ps3 or vita or both.Say what you will, but Dragon Quest: Heroes should have been a PS4 exclusive. I'm sure it will sell well, but I (and many people) pre-ordered the PS3 version (same with DB:Xenoverse). I refuse to upgrade until there are more exclusive games. VERY curious to see how the sales figures compare on the two versions though.
Im very curious to see the effect of the ps3/vita over the sales of the ps4 versions. When people list the upcoming games, theres no doubt its a great lineup, but most of it is also coming on the ps3 or vita or both.
The ps4 already had a couple of multiplatfor big japanese games and nome of them resulted in higher sales and in most of the cases, the audience just got divided. I think DQ heroes is the first title that can actually have some nice sales across both consoles. I've got no hope for the other titles at all.
Well the thing is the PS4 is the one leeching titles from PS3 and Vita, not the other way around. Especially in regards to stuff like God Eater and Toukiden.
PS4 SKU in such cases was probably added for Western sales. Its a good decision but lets see how it turns out.
I assume next week we won't get Xbox One numbers. We'll just a get a list of names of the people who bought it.
To a degree but then DQH is evidently still undecided for the west?PS4 SKU in such cases was probably added for Western sales. Its a good decision but lets see how it turns out.
Say what you will, but Dragon Quest: Heroes should have been a PS4 exclusive. I'm sure it will sell well, but I (and many people) pre-ordered the PS3 version (same with DB:Xenoverse). I refuse to upgrade until there are more exclusive games. VERY curious to see how the sales figures compare on the two versions though.
Say what you will, but Dragon Quest: Heroes should have been a PS4 exclusive. I'm sure it will sell well, but I (and many people) pre-ordered the PS3 version (same with DB:Xenoverse). I refuse to upgrade until there are more exclusive games. VERY curious to see how the sales figures compare on the two versions though.
On Comgnet store the ps3 version pre-order is ahead of ps4 version so i don't think it's a good thing for square enix to make it exclusive to ps4
i knew something was off with what you saidThe Vita's first year was a total trainwreck, it took more than a full year to reach one million. Meanwhile the PS4 got there in about 10 months.
It is indeed very hard to tell.
You have a few big retailers that comprise a lot of the market.
I remember Media Create saying the Top 10 had like 52%.
And it makes sense, considering their influence. Yamada Denki (ヤマダ電機 has 960 retail stores, and the vast majority of those sell video games.
Geo has 1,234 retail stores that sell new video games.
Tsutaya has 584 retail stores that sell new video games.
etc.
I've come across the 30,000 total video game stores number:
But I don't know how to relate it to the 3,600 stores figure.
For example, Famitsu + Media Create track Tsutaya. But I don't know if the 3,600 Famitsu / 3,000 Media Create figures count Tsutaya as 1 "store" (retailer), or if they count Tsutaya as 584 individual stores.
Not all Tsutaya stores sell videogames.
Tsutaya stores also sell CD and DVD and some shops are just specialited in these two articles, not selling videogames.
sörine;150651809 said:To a degree but then DQH is evidently still undecided for the west?
Alisha was marketed as the main heroine, but she ended up being a minor character you can't play for most of the game. But they're releasing a DLC with her as the main character (free for a limited time) soon. Most people are mad their waifu got slighted.
If you read the impressions from level headed people in the import thread on here or a few threads on GameFAQs, the game has a few issues, but it's a pretty good game.
Getting really tired of seeing this blanket statement trotted out here to dismiss any complaints directed towards.the Alisha DLC
I don't even care that much about the character. What I do care about is that Tales games have been having more and more content ripped out of them and put out as DLC. And now they're having an entire DLC chapter devoted to a characterI'm angry about the DLC practice. I'd be just as mad if it were a DLC chapter with Sorey or Mikleo or Lailah or whatever. I don't get how that point gets brushed under the rug because of "lol waifu." To me, increasing amounts of DLC is the much, much bigger problem here. And if they get away with this, past precedent shows that they'll just take more content out of future games and make them DLC.that was marketed in a misleading manner, with even the game Tales of Asteria listing Alisha as the heroine of ToZ until recently.
The DLC being free for a short period doesn't excuse it either, in my opinion.
Holy crap...I forgot that was even a thing.Layton 7 says hiya
So they specifically marketed Alicia as a important character to make people like her, way before the release, so that they could make money from the DLC that involved her, which was planned to be released right after the game's launch.
I would of thought my way would of made more money and would of not have had such a bad reaction.
1 year is a suitable amount of time to stop that notion, especially now that we get a Tales nearly every year.
Hopefully the game is scrapped and Capcom is now working on a proper sequel for Breath of Fire.Isn't it kind of crazy that Breath of Fire 6 was announced in August 2013 and still isn't out yet? How many phone/browser games have a dev cycle that long?
Less transportation clogging.Why Nintendo launches so many games on saturday?