l2ounD
Member
You can do a 360 when in bumper or hood view with the right analog stick
Last edited:
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Next-gen Racing Graphics Face-off | (Next-gen means current-gen)
- Thread starter Gestault
- Start date
LostDonkey
Member
So it's not the player car?
Also when i take screens with share button i dont get writing in bottom corner.
Also when i take screens with share button i dont get writing in bottom corner.
Last edited:
fran.fernandez
Member
Force look like a game, GT is more real than real life lol
FukuDaruma
Member
You can clearly see some aliasing and lower samples motion blur in the first image.
Creative and talented people make all kinds of amazing shots using the bumper camera in gameplay.
They use their car as the "camera" to shoot other cars.
All these are gameplay with the "Prioritize Frame Rate" 2K mode. The "Prioritize Quality" mode doesn't have Motion Blur but does Supersampling AA.
Apart from Replays, the 1080p60 "Prefer Frame Rate" mode has Motion Blur in gameplay (except in the Cokpit view), and it has great realistic moments:
Last edited:
FukuDaruma
Member
And I do get the lower right text when doing in-game screenshots with the share button.
It's the GT logo on the lower left part that is exclusive to the photomode captures.
FukuDaruma
Member
FukuDaruma
Member
GTS
M1chl
Currently Gif and Meme Champion
Downforce is interesting: https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/a3RnnPv_460sv.mp4
FukuDaruma
Member
Last edited:
Someone complained about rough foliage quality in FH4. Yes, msaa has no alpha to coverage component by default and sprites have no msaa, but you can force alpha to coverage in nvidia drivers. Just turn on transparent AA specially for FH4 exe.
but does that eat fps ? if so i allways find stuff that dont matter for me like those and lowering that to gain some fps.
M1chl
Currently Gif and Meme Champion
Da fuq is dat!
GTS
My guess is invisible walls, without "roof" : ) A since the downforce "sucks" to the ground, it kind of make sense, I guess : D
Last edited:
FukuDaruma
Member
Driveclub.
A lot of the "little gifs" previously posted were taken from here. This is at 1440p quality:
A lot of the "little gifs" previously posted were taken from here. This is at 1440p quality:
Last edited:
FukuDaruma
Member
Yes, of course it does. Use it only if you have GPU power to spare.
Connxtion
Member
Personally I think if Forza or any versions had proper lighting like GTS and Driveclub it would look a lot like what you see in GTS/Driveclub.
Lighting goes a long way it making the final image look pleasing to the eye or natural.
The issue with GTS/Driveclub lighting is at times it can make the game look bland/flat and unattractive.
Probably why forza games go for a custom look over natural lighting. Us humans like vibrant colours, it looks more pleasing to our eyes. (Brain)
This is why food packaging is bright colours, gets our attention and we like vibrant colours
Lighting goes a long way it making the final image look pleasing to the eye or natural.
The issue with GTS/Driveclub lighting is at times it can make the game look bland/flat and unattractive.
Probably why forza games go for a custom look over natural lighting. Us humans like vibrant colours, it looks more pleasing to our eyes. (Brain)
This is why food packaging is bright colours, gets our attention and we like vibrant colours
You can ignore this tweak if you play at 4k. However 1080p+msaa looks awfull because of lack of foliage antialiasing. You can force DSR 4k or use transparent AA with 1080p. DSR looks better, but fps drop would be even bigger(I have 40fps with my 980t at dsr 4K ). With 1080p+trsaa I achieve stable 60fps.
As for me, transparent AA worth it. I use it in some games even at 4k. Crysis 1 has no foliage AA, so 4k doesn't fix the problem, only trsaa can make this game look good.
Last edited:
FukuDaruma
Member
phil_t98
#SonyToo
way to blurry and yes I do have it myself
Personally I think if Forza or any versions had proper lighting like GTS and Driveclub it would look a lot like what you see in GTS/Driveclub.
Lighting goes a long way it making the final image look pleasing to the eye or natural.
The issue with GTS/Driveclub lighting is at times it can make the game look bland/flat and unattractive.
Probably why forza games go for a custom look over natural lighting. Us humans like vibrant colours, it looks more pleasing to our eyes. (Brain)
This is why food packaging is bright colours, gets our attention and we like vibrant colours
Car colors are vibrant in real life. Why do you prefer dull colors?
FukuDaruma
Member
PSVR res and CA sucks, but car detail is still impressive even in the severely cut down VR version of the game.
FukuDaruma
Member
Let's put ut some Forza's beauties too. 
Last edited:
Turk1993
GAFs #1 source for car graphic comparisons
I have to adress this because you said that i made this up on another site and now the same here, and that it doesn't change the detail in the environment and when zooming in on photomode. I have showed it a couple of times now that GTS photomode upgrades the environment also just like the car model. The grass, the trees, reflections, draw distance and shadows all get better in photomode. And GTS only renders the zoomed part in photomode where it enhances everything in that zoomed frame. It happens also in the replays, why do you think it runs 30fps in 1800p mode and 60fps with drops in 1080p if it was the same as gameplay. Here is all the proofThat's not true.
GTSport gameplay
GTSport replay
gameplay
photomode
gameplay
photomode
now lets look at replays, look how much leafs and grass it renders in replays vs gameplay where there is almost no grass and less foliage
gameplay
replay
and this is for zoom part, where you said that it was bullshit that it renders only whats in frame and enhance it.
normal 28mm
zoomed 448mm
LostDonkey
FukuDaruma
Member
Man, you sure do have real talent finding the worst bugs in GTS and Driveclub.
FukuDaruma
Member
GTS
Last edited:
Turk1993
GAFs #1 source for car graphic comparisons
That happens in all the games, Forza included. Just wanted to show that it gets enhanced in photomode and replay. The trees look ok in general, and with the right lighting better than Forza Motorsport 7 even in gameplay. Soo this is not to shit on itMan, you sure do have real talent finding the worst bugs in GTS and Driveclub.
Connxtion
Member
Never said I prefer dull colours. I said if forza used realistic lighting (and not more on the warmer side of the spectrum) it would look a lot like GTS/Driveclub.
GTS/Driveclub use cool colours/blue light to be specific which is what sunlight is here on earth. Why when we see videos/gifs it looks closer to what we see everyday outside. And thus more realistic, as technically it is.
I prefer the real look, but it can look dull as hell, unlike a lighting system that makes everything vibrant and colourful.
l2ounD
Member
I'd be curious to see what details get enhanced on different tracks
Replay mode enhanced!
Last edited:
Turk1993
GAFs #1 source for car graphic comparisons
Here you can also see the difference pretty clear, there are more grass and leafs. Also the water is now reflecting the area and the trees are higher quality with higher quality shadows.
gameplay
photomode
LostDonkey
Member
I knew I remembered seeing it.
Getting told its bullshit when its not.
Getting told its bullshit when its not.
FukuDaruma
Member
Real Life
GTS
GTS
l2ounD
Member
I knew I remembered seeing it.
Getting told its bullshit when its not.
Just making sure, you do understand this is a gameplay shot now?
GTSport gameplay
Last edited:
Hobbygaming
has been asked to post in 'Grounded' mode.
LostDonkey
Member
FukuDaruma
Member
Any tips how to improve gifs' image quality?
SunhiLegend uses Photoshop and 30fps...
l2ounD
Member
I was thinking more in terms of replays but I'd expect photomode to render out a higher quality image given how long it takes. It sucks that it doesnt capture the marbles or the rain hitting the ground though as it would make for more interesting photos.
But in lobbies that you join and spectate the replay system there is missing more stuff than when you're playing like tire marks and way more smoke than the clip shows, which is a bummer cause I would like to capture a more detailed full frame vid. Still can look cool to me.
But in lobbies that you join and spectate the replay system there is missing more stuff than when you're playing like tire marks and way more smoke than the clip shows, which is a bummer cause I would like to capture a more detailed full frame vid. Still can look cool to me.
Here you can also see the difference pretty clear, there are more grass and leafs. Also the water is now reflecting the area and the trees are higher quality with higher quality shadows.
gameplay
photomode
Last edited:
LostDonkey
Member
Now know why the writing was missing on my screenshots. Monitor was goong into overscan? Cutting a portion of the border off.
I have to adress this because you said that i made this up on another site and now the same here, and that it doesn't change the detail in the environment and when zooming in on photomode. I have showed it a couple of times now that GTS photomode upgrades the environment also just like the car model. The grass, the trees, reflections, draw distance and shadows all get better in photomode. And GTS only renders the zoomed part in photomode where it enhances everything in that zoomed frame. It happens also in the replays, why do you think it runs 30fps in 1800p mode and 60fps with drops in 1080p if it was the same as gameplay. Here is all the proof
gameplay
photomode
gameplay
photomode
now lets look at replays, look how much leafs and grass it renders in replays vs gameplay where there is almost no grass and less foliage
gameplay
replay
and this is for zoom part, where you said that it was bullshit that it renders only whats in frame and enhance it.
normal 28mm
zoomed 448mm
Besides the procedural grass increase which varies depending on the track, everything else you're showing in those pics is the photomode benefits from supersampling and better filtering, which is what I mentioned on the other site; shadows and reflections also benefit from supersampling. In photomode there's a limitless filtering for the distant object texture detail, whereas in gameplay there is a cutoff area. That's why in gameplay the closer environment objects to the camera can look the same as in photomode, but after the cutoff area you will see the difference the filtering brings.
Also, GTS is 1800p checkerboarded, so you're outputting that to a 4k native screenshot size which does the opposite of supersampling and upscales the lower native-res output to a larger-sized screengrab. Downsampling GTSport to 1080p to give it some supersampling makes it closer to photomode, it's still not perfect since photomode supersampling multiplier is higher by an unknown amount, but the difference below isn't notably large. Supersampling and better filtering is stuff that you can easily brute force on PC, and why emulated old games can look amazing.
gameplay downsampled
photomode
And no, replay doesn't add the same benefits of photomode as you described besides the procedural grass fauna (which again the amount depends on the track). Draw distance trees, shadows, reflections, and texture/environment detail filtering is the same as gameplay.
gameplay
replay
Replays drop to 30fps because of the wider field of view and higher panning camera angles which requires the game to render a larger portion of the environment on screen compared to the limited field of view and low angle with gameplay cameras. Forza 7 on One X also drops the replays and environment intro sequences to 30fps, why do you think that is?
Last edited:
l2ounD
Member
there's still some time to kill till the next gamesit's amazing to be still in discussion between the differences of replay and ingame of GT sport .. this thread is fascinating
phil_t98
#SonyToo
looks like a lot of cutbacks I gameplay mode to get it running smooth 60fps, as soon as it gets to replay which I believe is 30fps there is more detailI have to adress this because you said that i made this up on another site and now the same here, and that it doesn't change the detail in the environment and when zooming in on photomode. I have showed it a couple of times now that GTS photomode upgrades the environment also just like the car model. The grass, the trees, reflections, draw distance and shadows all get better in photomode. And GTS only renders the zoomed part in photomode where it enhances everything in that zoomed frame. It happens also in the replays, why do you think it runs 30fps in 1800p mode and 60fps with drops in 1080p if it was the same as gameplay. Here is all the proof
gameplay
photomode
gameplay
photomode
now lets look at replays, look how much leafs and grass it renders in replays vs gameplay where there is almost no grass and less foliage
gameplay
replay
and this is for zoom part, where you said that it was bullshit that it renders only whats in frame and enhance it.
normal 28mm
zoomed 448mm
phil_t98
#SonyToo
you can defiantly see detail changers in the trees on the left between gameplay and replay modeBesides the procedural grass increase which varies depending on the track, everything else you're showing in those pics is the photomode benefits from supersampling and better filtering, which is what I mentioned on the other site; shadows and reflections also benefit from supersampling. In photomode there's a limitless filtering for the distant object texture detail, whereas in gameplay there is a cutoff area. That's why in gameplay the closer environment objects to the camera can look the same as in photomode, but after the cutoff area you will see the difference the filtering brings.
Also, GTS is 1800p checkerboarded, so you're outputting that to a 4k native screenshot size which does the opposite of supersampling and upscales the lower native-res output to a larger-sized screengrab. Downsampling GTSport to 1080p to give it some supersampling makes it closer to photomode, it's still not perfect since photomode supersampling multiplier is higher by an unknown amount, but the difference below isn't notably large. Supersampling and better filtering is stuff that you can easily brute force on PC, and why emulated old games can look amazing.
gameplay downsampled
photomode
And no, replay doesn't add the same benefits of photomode as you described besides the procedural grass fauna (which again the amount depends on the track). Draw distance trees, shadows, reflections, and texture/environment detail filtering is the same as gameplay.
gameplay
replay
Replays drop to 30fps because of the wider field of view and higher panning camera angles which requires the game to render a larger portion of the environment on screen compared to the limited field of view and low angle with gameplay cameras. Forza 7 on One X also drops the replays and environment intro sequences to 30fps, why do you think that is?
FukuDaruma
Member
GTS
waltyftmus Prime
Member
Stunning.
Hobbygaming
has been asked to post in 'Grounded' mode.
Wait this is real right?I was thinking more in terms of replays but I'd expect photomode to render out a higher quality image given how long it takes. It sucks that it doesnt capture the marbles or the rain hitting the ground though as it would make for more interesting photos.
But in lobbies that you join and spectate the replay system there is missing more stuff than when you're playing like tire marks and way more smoke than the clip shows, which is a bummer cause I would like to capture a more detailed full frame vid. Still can look cool to me.
Last edited:
FukuDaruma
Member
Damn, that Anna short is fantastic. That IceVip1337 sure is some seriously talented mofo.
Turk1993
GAFs #1 source for car graphic comparisons
Are you serious? The reflections, added grass, added leafs, higher quality shadows and higher lods has nothing to do with a filter. you can cleary see even leafs and grass been added right next to you and the shadows below you car gets nice and softer in photomode so its not only about the draw distance. You can downsample as much as you whant nothing will change the facts that GTS photomode enchances the graphics like in my picture. And also in replay you can clearly see big difference in draw distance, added leafs, added grass and reflections wich is absent in gameplay. Every map has some sort of enhancement in GTS in photomode and replay. And even if its a so called "filter" as you say its still not the same as gameplay where you see huge differences. And photomode been native 4K is a enhancement in itself wich you are even saying yourself. just look at the trees and the car model and other things like grass and shadows and leafs. you still insist that its gets enhanced.Besides the procedural grass increase which varies depending on the track, everything else you're showing in those pics is the photomode benefits from supersampling and better filtering, which is what I mentioned on the other site; shadows and reflections also benefit from supersampling. In photomode there's a limitless filtering for the distant object texture detail, whereas in gameplay there is a cutoff area. That's why in gameplay the closer environment objects to the camera can look the same as in photomode, but after the cutoff area you will see the difference the filtering brings.
Also, GTS is 1800p checkerboarded, so you're outputting that to a 4k native screenshot size which does the opposite of supersampling and upscales the lower native-res output to a larger-sized screengrab. Downsampling GTSport to 1080p to give it some supersampling makes it closer to photomode, it's still not perfect since photomode supersampling multiplier is higher by an unknown amount, but the difference below isn't notably large. Supersampling and better filtering is stuff that you can easily brute force on PC, and why emulated old games can look amazing.
gameplay downsampled
photomode
And no, replay doesn't add the same benefits of photomode as you described besides the procedural grass fauna (which again the amount depends on the track). Draw distance trees, shadows, reflections, and texture/environment detail filtering is the same as gameplay.
gameplay
replay
Replays drop to 30fps because of the wider field of view and higher panning camera angles which requires the game to render a larger portion of the environment on screen compared to the limited field of view and low angle with gameplay cameras. Forza 7 on One X also drops the replays and environment intro sequences to 30fps, why do you think that is?
gameplay
photomode
gameplay
photomode
and here the added reflection on the water is not because of a filter lol
Here you can also see the difference pretty clear, there are more grass and leafs. Also the water is now reflecting the area and the trees are higher quality with higher quality shadows.
gameplay
photomode
Ofcourse, they prioritized frame rate over graphics in gameplay to make it as smooth as possible wich is a good thing. But saying there are no enchancements in photomode and replays is just untrue, its clear as daylight.
FukuDaruma
Member
GTS
l2ounD
Member
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Poll