:lol :lol :lol :lolHyllian said:http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/4039/ninteyburymhge4ft9.gif
kassatsu said:Need to download that episode again, will have him in there soon
Hyllian said:
Hyllian said:[[/IMG]
Better rehost that before the frog shows up.Hyllian said:http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/4039/ninteyburymhge4ft9.gif
But I don't think the manufacturers were bleeding as much as today (except Nintendo).damisa said:The first price drop last gen happened in may for all 3 consoles.
Ronin said:
pilonv1 said::lol :lol
Basically US is lower price = win.
Hyllian said:
Shit, someone better rehost that for him!kassatsu said:Better rehost that before the frog shows up.
People spend $300-400 on mp3 players, digital cameras, and a whole slew of other electronics devices all the time. $400 for a next-gen game console isn't much at all, especially considering the average age of gamers over the past decade has been in the mid to late 20's. The majority demographic aren't pre-teens saving up lunch money to buy a videogame system. We are adults. If you count inflation, the premium 360 is only like $50 more than what the PS2 launched at. The 360 even has a $300 SKU. So why isn't the 360 really taking off? The problem is that Xbox simply isn't as popular a brand as Playstation. It never has been and never will maybe until X720. It's a fraction of the popularity. I agree the PS3 is too much at $600 but if it didn't include Blu-ray and launched at the same price as the 360, $299-399, it would be absolutely dominating right now. I fully expect and hope (for my gaming tastes) that the next round of consoles are going to be $400-500.. because that means that there will be a true generational leap in technology over this gen , leading to improvements in every facet of gaming... gfx, gameplay, audio, interactivity, etc. By the time they're released in another 5 years, the $400 price tags will be even more acceptable.LAMBO said:Good to see people not buying 400 and 600 consoles. Atrocious prices.
damisa said:The first price drop last gen happened in may for all 3 consoles.
soundwave05 said:Give 'em an inch and they take a mile :lol
Seriously when was the last time there was a PSP game in the top NPD top 10. I can't even remember anymore.
ORANGUTAN said:People spend $300-400 on mp3 players, digital cameras, and a whole slew of other electronics devices all the time. $400 for a next-gen game console isn't much at all, especially considering the average age of gamers over the past decade has been in the mid to late 20's. The majority demographic aren't pre-teens saving up lunch money to buy a videogame system. We are adults. If you count inflation, the premium 360 is only like $50 more than what the PS2 launched at. The 360 even has a $300 SKU. So why isn't the 360 really taking off? The problem is that Xbox simply isn't as popular a brand as Playstation. It never has been and never will maybe until X720. It's a fraction of the popularity. I agree the PS3 is too much at $600 but if it didn't include Blu-ray and launched at the same price as the 360, $299-399, it would be absolutely dominating right now. I fully expect and hope (for my gaming tastes) that the next round of consoles are going to be $400-500.. because that means that there will be a true generational leap in technology over this gen , leading to improvements in every facet of gaming... gfx, gameplay, audio, interactivity, etc. By the time they're released in another 5 years, the $400 price tags will be even more acceptable.
ElectricBlue187 said:Anybody know what the projected month for Wii passing the 360 is at this rate?
ORANGUTAN said:People spend $300-400 on mp3 players, digital cameras, and a whole slew of other electronics devices all the time. $400 for a next-gen game console isn't much at all, especially considering the average age of gamers over the past decade has been in the mid to late 20's. The majority demographic aren't pre-teens saving up lunch money to buy a videogame system. We are adults. If you count inflation, the premium 360 is only like $50 more than what the PS2 launched at. The 360 even has a $300 SKU. So why isn't the 360 really taking off? The problem is that Xbox simply isn't as popular a brand as Playstation. It never has been and never will maybe until X720. It's a fraction of the popularity. I agree the PS3 is too much at $600 but if it didn't include Blu-ray and launched at the same price as the 360, $299-399, it would be absolutely dominating right now. I fully expect and hope (for my gaming tastes) that the next round of consoles are going to be $400-500.. because that means that there will be a true generational leap in technology over this gen , leading to improvements in every facet of gaming... gfx, gameplay, audio, interactivity, etc. By the time they're released in another 5 years, the $400 price tags will be even more acceptable.
ORANGUTAN said:People spend $300-400 on mp3 players, digital cameras, and a whole slew of other electronics devices all the time. $400 for a next-gen game console isn't much at all, especially considering the average age of gamers over the past decade has been in the mid to late 20's. The majority demographic aren't pre-teens saving up lunch money to buy a videogame system. We are adults. If you count inflation, the premium 360 is only like $50 more than what the PS2 launched at. The 360 even has a $300 SKU. So why isn't the 360 really taking off? The problem is that Xbox simply isn't as popular a brand as Playstation. It never has been and never will maybe until X720. It's a fraction of the popularity. I agree the PS3 is too much at $600 but if it didn't include Blu-ray and launched at the same price as the 360, $299-399, it would be absolutely dominating right now. I fully expect and hope (for my gaming tastes) that the next round of consoles are going to be $400-500.. because that means that there will be a true generational leap in technology over this gen , leading to improvements in every facet of gaming... gfx, gameplay, audio, interactivity, etc. By the time they're released in another 5 years, the $400 price tags will be even more acceptable.
They actually can. Nintendo tied them, but it took both the Wii and the monster that is the DS to do it.Stop It said:Indeed, they can't even claim software supremacy this month, I can't wait to see Sony spin their way out of this one too, last month they didn't even refer to PS3, this month...I can see them not referring to much at all, except that PS2 outsold 360, which is hardly an achievement.
But most gamers will easily spend that much on games in a year. Over the life of a console, the hardware isn't the biggest investment.LAMBO said:Good to see people not buying 400 and 600 consoles. Atrocious prices.
Well, I think that's obvious...but momentum is still momentum and MS has been at the same price for a year and a half now...higher in the last two months if you wanna count Elite. Summer is here it might not matter as much, but, IMO, if they don't cut by early August, they'll have squandered a perfectly good runup to increase sales rate before the big titles hit (Madden, Halo 3, GTAIV, etc.)...increasing what userbase they have quickly and boosting software that much more. It also helps them clear inventory earlier in anticipation of lower-cost revisions of the system. Something's gotta leave the channels to make room for the inevitable Halo 3 X360 Spartan/Elite/whatever bundle, right? MS can't play against Sony this way, IMO. In my view, they should be keeping their competition off-balance, not giving them time to recover.Cosmozone said:People who are demanding price cuts are dead wrong. Sales are slow these months. If a price drop occurs now, sales would increase only that far and in the holiday season where sales are much stronger, you're missing out a lot of money. Can't raise the price again you know. And higher losses with each console sold, of course, as already stated.
:lolParch said:But most gamers will easily spend that much on games in a year.
Parch said:But most gamers will easily spend that much on games in a year.
Nah, kill this sucker.schuelma said:So are we sticking in this thread or migrating to the "official" one?
Parch said:But most gamers will easily spend that much on games in a year. Over the life of a console, the hardware isn't the biggest investment.
GTFOEarthstrike said:Just more proof people can't deal witht he reality that Nintendo is outputting games more people want to play, so they just put the entirety of the onus on the price, instead of attributing some of the poor sales to Sony's and Microsoft's unimaginative, primitive notions about what games are and what they should become.
Earthstrike said:Just more proof people can't deal witht he reality that Nintendo is outputting a platform that people can afford to play
Most of games for Nintendo platforms were the company's titles, compared with the Xbox 360, which had games from independent publishers break the charts," said Aaron Greenberg, group product manager for Microsoft's Xbox 360.
"For the Xbox 360, we are seeing 65% of third-party sales come from third-party publishers, compared with 15% for the PS3 and 25% for the Wii," he said.
360 THE PLACE TO BE FOR 3RD PARTY.capslock said:
:lol :lol :lolHyllian said:
LAMBO said:Most gamers here, not most gamers. I don't come close to $400 a year on games. I've never payed more than $200 for a console and that's not going to change just because MS and sony are delusional.
sonycowboy said:Don't expect any other numbers than Bloomberg's (which came by way of Microsoft) and Gamedailys (came from ???) .
sonycowboy said:Fixed
That's wierd and pretty true. The PSP is the anti-360.jj984jj said:Will it help in Japan though? I remember that the PSP LTD got close to passing the DS LTD even though it launched months later, the US does like to buy the hardware.
More like Nintendo moneyhats, scb told is PS3 beat it this month.
capslock said:
Most of games for Nintendo platforms were the company's titles, compared with the Xbox 360, which had games from independent publishers break the charts," said Aaron Greenberg, group product manager for Microsoft's Xbox 360.
"For the Xbox 360, we are seeing 65% of third-party sales come from third-party publishers, compared with 15% for the PS3 and 25% for the Wii," he said.
Ryudo said:You miss out on some of the best games then. Your loss.
ORANGUTAN said:People spend $300-400 on mp3 players, digital cameras, and a whole slew of other electronics devices all the time. $400 for a next-gen game console isn't much at all, especially considering the average age of gamers over the past decade has been in the mid to late 20's. The majority demographic aren't pre-teens saving up lunch money to buy a videogame system. We are adults. If you count inflation, the premium 360 is only like $50 more than what the PS2 launched at. The 360 even has a $300 SKU. So why isn't the 360 really taking off? The problem is that Xbox simply isn't as popular a brand as Playstation. It never has been and never will maybe until X720. It's a fraction of the popularity. I agree the PS3 is too much at $600 but if it didn't include Blu-ray and launched at the same price as the 360, $299-399, it would be absolutely dominating right now. I fully expect and hope (for my gaming tastes) that the next round of consoles are going to be $400-500.. because that means that there will be a true generational leap in technology over this gen , leading to improvements in every facet of gaming... gfx, gameplay, audio, interactivity, etc. By the time they're released in another 5 years, the $400 price tags will be even more acceptable.