You weren't very descriptive yourself.
I've made this argument hundreds of times; how can we point to a model where the top 5 percent of gamemakers prosper and say that it's sustainable? Repeatedly the top 10 for NPD consists of the same 8-10 companies; Nintendo, Sony, MS, Epic, Capcom, EA, Ubisoft, and Activision, with odd appearances by companies with higher budgets yet lower game yields like Bethesda and Sega. It would be all well and good if the market only consisted of these publishers, yet it's only been reduced to that. Good luck sniffing the top 10 if your budget can't compete with that of any of these devs, and if it can, but bombs anyway? Shutter your doors.
What of the Mid and lower tier games? Would smaller developers like Atlus, Marvelous, or Majesco survive for one minute if they had to compete with these companies and play with the same budgets? We constantly talk about the success of companies in the NPD threads because that's what we see; yet for some reason (most likely because the average GAFer doesn't care about these games) no one asks, "where are the smaller titles on the 360 and PS3?"
No doubt someone will shout XBLA/PSN in retort, however both services aren't exactly a haven for mid tier devs as they've been lauded. Show me the explosion of support on XBLA, PSN, or even WiiWare for devs that are bigger than indies, but smaller than mega companies like Activision?