That would've 100% killed the mood for me and led to me bailing 30 mins in. Think it was a one time thing or is she one of those kind of people who are oblivious and text nonstop?
I was annoyed by it with on Monday's date with the Latina and I wasn't physically attracted to her; mid conversation, she busted out her phone and would start texting. She cited work stuff but my facial expression gave away that I was visibly annoyed. I wanted to bail out a few minutes into it since I wasn't feeling it. It was an excruciating slog. I've ghosted her and deleted her number.
To answer your question, I think she was one of those people who's oblivious and can't put down her phone because she's never been called out on it. She was gripping on to it when were walking and when we got to the subway, she whipped out her headphones and proceeded to record a performer covering Britney Spears' toxic to send to a friend. She's one of those people who paints themselves as being super social and "important." She reminded me of another girl I went out with last December who was similar.
I followed up with her and haven't heard back so it was a safe bet that I was just along for the ride/part of her plan. I've found that whenever I follow up with a girl and she takes at least 36 hours to respond, it's always been an L. Moving forward, I'm going to have some self-respect/0 tolerance for texting in the middle of a date/conversation and bail out if it happens again. My phone is always in silent mode during dates.
I updated my CMB profile and added "I appreciate when my date Doesn't check her phone during dates and gives me her full undivided attention" so the girl I'm seeing tomorrow can get the hint ahead of time.
On another note, I think I might have to delete and reboot my Tinder account as I haven't gotten any matches and Bumble has been dry. I get the occasional visitor on my OKC profile but I haven't gotten an unsolicited message in a few months. If anything, I feel discouraged from messaging them unless they "Like" me.
I find it ironic that for every time I read a profile about how the girl is a feminist and wants to smash the patriarchy, they don't message guys first and/or have only pictures of their face. Does not compute. One of my standout visitors today has been a 43 year old 6'4'' woman who addresses right off the bat that she used to be a model and a basketball player and has a small dog. Will try messaging her on a whim
I listened to that dating podcast,
Why Oh Why's two part Bumble episode and learned that the founder was an ex-girlfriend of a Tinder co-founder and that the app's algorithm puts super attractive women up front first before the average looking girls start popping up. There was some other stuff as well that was really insightful including why bots have proliferated Tinder and not Bumble yet (the Android version's API was a factor). It's worth giving it a listen.
GamerJM said:
Actually looking back at the original messages she didn't phrase it exactly like that. She said something like "We could chill at your place and watch something". Also on her questions she said she wouldn't have sex on the first date....but then she said she's also looking for casual sex (in addition to short term/long term dating) so idk. I figure I might as well buy condoms just in case but I'm not really expecting anything.
Women list casual sex because double standards but I'm sure she gets bombarded with triple the messages as a drawback. Otherwise, I agree to keep your expectations low.