That artist has a history of being really bad with metaphors:
I don't entirely understand this. Is he saying we're hitting the big and unimportant things in the aftermath instead of the small and important one?
That artist has a history of being really bad with metaphors:
I don't entirely understand this. Is he saying we're hitting the big and unimportant things in the aftermath instead of the small and important one?
CHEEZMO™;45768833 said:
I don't entirely understand this. Is he saying we're hitting the big and unimportant things in the aftermath instead of the small and important one?
That comment from the article is incredibly racist and yet she doesn't realize it...I'm not sure which is worse...
It's based off of a painting called The Problem We All Live With, by Norman Rockwell and....that's about as far as I can go trying to make sense of this moronic cartoon.
The point of the original Rockwell painting, was to show how a young black child needed to be escorted to (an all White) school by U.S. Marshalls because of the prevalent racism against black people at the time. And this is why I'm sort of at a loss as to what Lester's trying to get at. Taken in the same context as the Rockwell paining, Limbaugh is apparently in need of protection from the evil liberal critics (who are supposed to represent the KKK, I'd imagine. Also, note the word "conservative" written on the wall, presumably supposed to be an equivalent slur as "nigger" in the Rockwell painting. Awesome work, Mike!).
Now, if that WAS what Lester was going for, that'd be one thing. Yes, it would still ultimately be fucking retarded and offensive, but at least I'd understand his point. The problem though, is that the marshalls are labeled "NFL", "Lib Media", and "True Racism". Is Lester trying to say that Rush is being protected by the NFL, Lib Media, and True Racism? That can't be it. Is it that those things are somehow part of the government? The latter two I could understand from the prism of a right wing twit, but where does the NFL fit in? And even if the NFL was part of the government, THAT STILL WOULDN'T MAKE ANY GODDAMNED SENSE!
It's based off of a painting called The Problem We All Live With, by Norman Rockwell and....that's about as far as I can go trying to make sense of this moronic cartoon.
The point of the original Rockwell painting, was to show how a young black child needed to be escorted to (an all White) school by U.S. Marshalls because of the prevalent racism against black people at the time. And this is why I'm sort of at a loss as to what Lester's trying to get at. Taken in the same context as the Rockwell paining, Limbaugh is apparently in need of protection from the evil liberal critics (who are supposed to represent the KKK, I'd imagine. Also, note the word "conservative" written on the wall, presumably supposed to be an equivalent slur as "nigger" in the Rockwell painting. Awesome work, Mike!).
Now, if that WAS what Lester was going for, that'd be one thing. Yes, it would still ultimately be fucking retarded and offensive, but at least I'd understand his point. The problem though, is that the marshalls are labeled "NFL", "Lib Media", and "True Racism". Is Lester trying to say that Rush is being protected by the NFL, Lib Media, and True Racism? That can't be it. Is it that those things are somehow part of the government? The latter two I could understand from the prism of a right wing twit, but where does the NFL fit in? And even if the NFL was part of the government, THAT STILL WOULDN'T MAKE ANY GODDAMNED SENSE!
Rush was fired as an NFL commentator on ESPN in 2003 for making some racist comments about Donovan McNabb. Of course, that also doesn't make sense, since this strip has a copyright of 2009.
Oh by the way, since I was absent for the week, I'm not aware of the reference in the new thread title. Someone wanna fill me in?
Yeah I'm aware of that NFL thing from 03', but even if this were made in that year, it STILL wouldn't make sense.
What game keeps track of your killcount on cops and hos specificallyMy Ramirez post for today:
My Ramirez post for today:
My Ramirez post for today:
WTF?The day after Labor Day, just as campaign season was entering its final frenzy, FreedomWorks, the Washington-based tea party organization, went into free fall.
Richard K. Armey, the group’s chairman and a former House majority leader, walked into the group’s Capitol Hill offices with his wife, Susan, and an aide holstering a handgun at his waist. The aim was to seize control of the group and expel Armey’s enemies: The gun-wielding assistant escorted FreedomWorks’ top two employees off the premises, while Armey suspended several others who broke down in sobs at the news.
The coup lasted all of six days. By Sept. 10, Armey was gone — with a promise of $8 million — and the five ousted employees were back. The force behind their return was Richard J. Stephenson, a reclusive Illinois millionaire who has exerted increasing control over one of Washington’s most influential conservative grass-roots organizations.
Did anyone ever tell him that the swirlies are annoying
The cartoonist wasn't serious with this right? A carrot you'll never get as the American dream for most Americans does seem about right.
LOL! The artist is such an idiot. Someone with a carrot to spare riding on the back of someone without a carrot, who will never get the carrot, is the perfect representation of the current situation in America. The rich have indeed been holding a carrot in front the poor. God this is so sad when you don't even have to work to switch a Republican cartoon back around on them. Are these people really that stupid?!The rich leading the poor along while riding on their backs.
YES.This is the phantom Obama conservatives and the GOP's been running against since 2008. Clint Eastwood and the empty chair at the RNC perfectly encapsulates this phenomenon.
The rich leading the poor along while riding on their backs.
Ok, the reason all of you aren't getting it is because you're still thinking with a reality-based vocabulary. "True racism" doesn't mean the KKK or anything like that, but supporters of affirmative action and black history month. "True racists" are those who refuse to acknowledge our colorblind utopia.That artist has a history of being really bad with metaphors:
Ok, the reason all of you aren't getting it is because you're still thinking with a reality-based vocabulary. "True racism" doesn't mean the KKK or anything like that, but supporters of affirmative action and black history month. "True racists" are those who refuse to acknowledge our colorblind utopia.
That assumes support for integration.There are a lot of issues with the image, but the one that really bugs me is how in his parody, he makes the US Marshalls protecting the little girl into villains.
Liberal propaganda. Wait, that's conservative propaganda?My Ramirez post for today:
Wait, I thought Obama had a job? Isn't Mittens the freeloading welfare queen with no job? 13% taxes is pretty much welfare.
That assumes support for integration.
I meant seeing the men as protectors assumes support for integration.No it doesn't.
I meant seeing the men as protectors assumes support for integration.
I meant seeing the men as protectors assumes support for integration.
...I had one say you shouldn't drink milk with your coffee because it's mixing an acid with a base.
Rush gets more money with dems in power, but obviously the artist isn't that clever.I could accept this explanation, but the thing is, Rush seems pretty content in that comic.
Congress is one dysfunctional institution.
Congress is one dysfunctional institution.
ahh so many unfunny cartoons make it stop!
Richard K. Armey, the group’s chairman and a former House majority leader, walked into the group’s Capitol Hill offices with his wife, Susan, and an aide holstering a handgun at his waist. The aim was to seize control of the group and expel Armey’s enemies: The gun-wielding assistant escorted FreedomWorks’ top two employees off the premises, while Armey suspended several others who broke down in sobs at the news.
Dick Armey armed coup. Dat ish cray.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/12/dick-armey-gun-coup-freedomworks.html
I mean seriously. Damn...
hahahaAs they say, the only thing that can stop a bad guy with an ethical breach is a good guy with an ethical breach.