Stoney Mason said:The flood of hypocritical Republican moral quotes over the years on this issue that are going to be brought up should be hilarious.
Absolutely fucking hilarious
omg rite said:Palin was smart to do it today. The hurricane is going to completely overshadow it.
SpeedingUptoStop said:So judging by the reaction i'm assuming Palin was running with Abstinence values?
What does vet mean anyways? It keeps getting thrown around and I feel left out :Xgkrykewy said:So I guess it's pretty apparent that Palin was not vetted even a little bit. What a desperate, shoestring campaign.
The abstinence education the GOP supports just failed for it's own VP candidate?Door2Dawn said:Wait what just happened?
Backgrounds checks.SpeedingUptoStop said:What does vet mean anyways? It keeps getting thrown around and I feel left out :X
Gaborn said:Nope, she's on the record as being pro contraception...
SpeedingUptoStop said:What does vet mean anyways? It keeps getting thrown around and I feel left out :X
beermonkey@tehbias said:Your kids getting knocked up is what happens when you are an absentee mom who chooses career over staying at home to raise the family.
that's what right-wing pundits would be saying if she were a dem
(post edited)
Oh. Just sort of assumed that.Gaborn said:Cyan - there's no evidence she was taught abstinence only.
HolyStar said:And so what if her daughter is pregnant a lot of teenageers get pregnant I don't see how this confilcts with family vaules.
Jenga said:The abstinence education the GOP supports just failed for it's own VP candidate?
If Palin supported abstinence education, this is a low blow. If she didn't, she'll probably be able to shrug it off except from the most hardcore christian voters.
In 2002, when she was running for lieutenant governor, Palin sent an e-mail to the anti-abortion Alaska Right to Life Board saying she was as "pro-life as any candidate can be" and has "adamantly supported our cause since I first understood, as a child, the atrocity of abortion."
Palin said last month that no woman should have to choose between her career, education and her child. She is pro-contraception and said she's a member of a pro-woman but anti-abortion group called Feminists for Life.
"I believe in the strength and the power of women, and the potential of every human life," she said.
Gaborn said:
ronito said:"Sweetie, this nomination means that we're going to go through a lot of media scrutiny. Fact that you're teenaged pregnant will have to be made known not only the church and school, but everyone in the United States. A lot of people will be mocking you and calling your immoral and others will just laugh. I'll be busy and wont be able to help you during this time of need. So after carefully considering the facts I've decided. I'm going to run. Love ya, Bye!"
Yeah, yeah.Gaborn said:Cyan - Ass/u/me
CharlieDigital said:Good thing she passed down those pro-contraception views to her daughter.
LOL.
Yeah, keep defending her. First, she was for contraception, except when it came to her own daughter.
Are you serious Gaborn?
Funny thing is, the GOP would be sticking it to a Democrat candidate if this happened. Mostly because the whole family values thing matters more to the hardcore right of the Republicans than any Democrats. I really wonder what the GOP will do. Announcing it during Hurricane coverage is probably the smartest thing done about it thus far.beermonkey@tehbias said:Your kids getting knocked up is what happens when you are an absentee mom who chooses career over staying at home to raise the family.
that's what right-wing pundits would be saying if she were a dem
(post edited)
GhaleonEB said:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/31/AR2008083101620.html
Didn't see it mentioned. Howard Wolfson is an Obama convert. It's a surprisingly honest piece.
omg rite said:... You're joking, right?
Amir0x said:As a parent, you can only do so much to prevent your child from doing this sort of thing no matter what you preach.
Amir0x said:Well now we know, hopefully that kills the baby conspiracy forEVER.
The actual conclusion is nothing special. As a parent, you can only do so much to prevent your child from doing this sort of thing no matter what you preach. That difficulty was probably compounded by the fact that Palin was a hard working mother who was obviously not able to be there all the time.
I don't think many Americans will give a shit, or if they do it'd be in the form of minor sympathy. Millions of Americans have teenagers who get pregnant, unfortunately.
TDG said:I can't believe that the same PoliGAFers who spent weeks ranting about how Rev. Wright was a non-issue, who talked about how what really mattered was the candidates, not who the candidates knew, who just yesterday were complaining about people getting all wrapped up in little issues that hardly matter while ignoring big issues that really matter, spent the last several days speculating about Palin's youngest child actually belonging to her daughter, and are now laughing and celebrating about Palin's daughter being pregnant.
Hypocrisy FTW.
Voted NO on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education and contraceptives. Vote to adopt an amendment to the Senate's 2006 Fiscal Year Budget that allocates $100 million for the prevention of unintended pregnancies.
Voted YES on $75M for abstinence education. Vote to retain a provision of the Budget Act that funds abstinence education to help reduce teenage pregnancy, using $75 million of the Maternal and Child Health Block Grant Program.
voted to end the Title X family planning program, credited with helping prevent over 9 million abortions, and quite a bit of teen pregnancy as well.
-- found himself ranked among the 25 worst senators for children by the Children's Defense Fund.
-- voted against making abstinence-only education medically accurate.
-- supported taking $75 million from the Maternal and Child Health Block Grant for an abstinence-only program.
HolyStar said:...no I'm not maybe it is against christian family values but good family values are loving your children even when they are in unfavorable circumstances. And how does it reflect on Palin as a mom?
ronito said:lessee just off the top of my head:
1. Opposes woman's right to choose what to do with her body even in the case of rape and incest. I mean even MORMONS will make these exceptions.
HolyStar said:...no I'm not maybe it is against christian family values but good family values are loving your children even when they are in unfavorable circumstances. And her daugher getting pregnant makes Palin a bad mom now? thoughts like these are why teen girls face scrutiny for getting pregnant.
Humor is lost on you I see. Must be that challenge you're a part of.HolyStar said:Based on what? The daughter would face scrutiny regardless. And this issue is going to come up and Palin is going to defend her and most likely provide finacial support for the child. So she should't run to be the VP because her daugher had sex. Get over yourself.
CharlieDigital said:But you can still provide contraception and proper education on the usage of contraception. If she's for contraception -- and we can only assume she practices what she preaches (not!) -- then how does this happen?
CharlieDigital said:But you can still provide contraception and proper education on the usage of contraception. If she's for contraception -- and we can only assume she practices what she preaches (not!) -- then how does this happen?