• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

RTX 5070 | Review Thread

Draugoth

Gold Member


Blog Reviews




Videos










Charts

At 1440p

  • 5070 is 0.81x Performance of 5070 Ti
  • 5070 is 0.91x Performance of 4070 Ti Super
  • 5070 is 0.97x Performance of 4070 Ti
  • 5070 is 1.05x Faster than 4070 Super
  • 5070 is 1.22x Faster than 4070
  • 5070 is 1.55x Faster than 2080 Ti and 3070
  • 5070 is 1.61x faster vs 4060 Ti 16GB
  • 5070 is 1.78x Faster vs 3060 Ti
  • 5070 is 2.35x Faster vs 3060

rtx-5070-1080p-average.jpg



rtx-5070-1440p-average.jpg


rtx-5070-4k-average.jpg


Via

Pros & Cons

  • Cool and quiet Founder's Edition design
  • Over 20% faster than an RTX 4070
  • DLSS 4 can multiply your frame rate
  • Good pricing (at MSRP)
  • Fantastic overclocking potential
  • Extremely energy-efficient
  • Idle fan-stop
  • Compact dual slot design
  • Support for HDMI 2.1 & DisplayPort 2.1
  • PCI-Express 5.0
  • Good video encode/decode hardware acceleration support

Cons:
  • Actual market pricing will be much higher than MSRP
  • Gen-over-gen improvement not that impressive (except for multi-frame generation)
  • Fans could be quieter
  • 12 GB VRAM not enough for 4K + RT + Frame Gen in some titles
  • Limited supply expected
  • Memory overclocking artificially limited by the driver
  • 35% worse than the 4090

- The Verge + TechPowerUp

 
Last edited:

T4keD0wN

Member
Sad Gordon Ramsay GIF by Hell's Kitchen

its not that bad hardware-wise compared to the 4070. These cards will end up being sold at 4090 msrp in real life, but wheres my 4090 performance fancy leather jacket man?
 
Last edited:

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
lmao, Lackwell is a complete fiasco. Jesus Christ.

lOC4LVN.png


Same performance as an RTX 4070. We're at the point where x70 cards barely get a 20% uplift gen-on-gen. Even the 2070 was 35% faster than the 1070 and 14% faster than the 1070 Ti. It also boasted okay RT performance and DLSS.

Lackwell is without a doubt the worst GPU generation in a long time. It makes Turing look like Pascal.
 

winjer

Gold Member

Pros & Cons


  • Cool and quiet Founder's Edition design
  • Over 20% faster than an RTX 4070
  • DLSS 4 can multiply your frame rate
  • Good pricing (at MSRP)
  • Fantastic overclocking potential
  • Extremely energy-efficient
  • Idle fan-stop
  • Compact dual slot design
  • Support for HDMI 2.1 & DisplayPort 2.1
  • PCI-Express 5.0
  • Good video encode/decode hardware acceleration support

Sorry, but several of those things are not Pros.

The Founder Edition cooler sends a ton of hot air on top of the CPU and memory. And this can become a problem in the summer, especially due to memory being very sensitive to temperature.
20% faster than the previous gen is a terrible improvement. Probably the worst ever in a gen over gen.
Fake frames have a ton of issues, including latency and image artifacts. The more fake frames it generates, the worst it gets.
Considering the lack of vram, even 550$ is a lot to ask for this GPU. And if we look at the die size, this should be a 5060.
PCI-e Gen5 is useless even on an RTX5090. Much more useless for a 5070.
 
Last year you could find a 4070 Super for even under 600€, now this is releasing at 669€, but no one will be able to find it for less than 700€ for months probably.

Performance per price was better last year with the series 4000 than it will be this year with the new gen (at least for now), crazy.

Wonder how will the 9070 compare to this.
 
Last year you could find a 4070 Super for even under 600€, now this is releasing at 669€, but no one will be able to find it for less than 700€ for months probably.

Performance per price was better last year with the series 4000 than it will be this year with the new gen (at least for now), crazy.

Wonder how will the 9070 compare to this.

The regular 9070 should be a bit faster.
 

64gigabyteram

Reverse groomer.
lmao, Lackwell is a complete fiasco. Jesus Christ.

lOC4LVN.png


Same performance as an RTX 4070. We're at the point where x70 cards barely get a 20% uplift gen-on-gen. Even the 2070 was 35% faster than the 1070 and 14% faster than the 1070 Ti. It also boasted okay RT performance and DLSS.

Lackwell is without a doubt the worst GPU generation in a long time. It makes Turing look like Pascal.
You should have posted the Indiana Jones screencap. 13fps due to 12gb VRAM.

0xr94Lf.png


It's the 8gb 3070 all over again.
We are already at a point where even 12gb is not enough for modern games. AMD should really reconsider cancelling that 32gb 9070 XTX.
 
Last edited:

yamaci17

Member
I'm happy with my 3070
I hope 6070 brings some decent improvements so I can build a PC around it eventually. 4070 and 5070 are not worth it for me
 

64gigabyteram

Reverse groomer.
The AMD prices are really competitive, let's see how those cards turn out.
9070 XT is rumored to be competitive with 4070 ti super in RT. if the 9070 isnt much slower than the XT in RT, AMD will for the first time have a product at similar value and SKU that beats Nvidia in RT
 
Top Bottom