Snow White 2025 Official Trailer | Gal Gadot & Rachel Zegler
- Thread starter LectureMaster
- Start date
Dural
Member
Jungle Book is without a doubt the best but I also thought Cinderella and Beauty and the Beast were good.
GateofD
Member
How do people get paid so much to write this trash.
Sleeping Beauty meets her Prince beforehand as well. I don't remember Snow White since its been so long, thought that was the one that they never met, but looked up the song and they have.
I assume this isn't in the live action movie, but its actually a great shot. The Prince serenading Snow White, and then panning to show the Queen seeing it all and getting tipped over the edge over her envy.
Sleeping Beauty meets her Prince beforehand as well. I don't remember Snow White since its been so long, thought that was the one that they never met, but looked up the song and they have.
I assume this isn't in the live action movie, but its actually a great shot. The Prince serenading Snow White, and then panning to show the Queen seeing it all and getting tipped over the edge over her envy.
Last edited:
StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
The animation in those old movies were incredible. It's like it has double or triple the frame animations compared to any modern day non-CGI cartoon. Then you look at your typical anime and it probably has 1/4 the frames.
The number of animators they had back then must had been massive.
Last edited:
GateofD
Member
When I watched Bambi and like Snow White as kid, I thought it was just part of the same pile/era of movies with the tapes of Beauty and the Beast or Aladdin my aunts got me.
Then older I'm like hold on...this was made in 1937 and 1945!? Like I be like "oh looks older, probably the 70's or something" but not that far back. Same with the looney tunes show on tv.
I heard good things about the Looney Tunes movie out right now too, and that got 0 advertising.
Then older I'm like hold on...this was made in 1937 and 1945!? Like I be like "oh looks older, probably the 70's or something" but not that far back. Same with the looney tunes show on tv.
I heard good things about the Looney Tunes movie out right now too, and that got 0 advertising.
Last edited:
Hari Seldon
Member
Under domestically. This will need Mufasa legs to make a profit, but Mufasa came out over Christmas and had solid reviews.
GymWolf
Gold Member
I'm gonna print some of these and glue them on my fridge door so i can laugh everytime i pass by.
AJUMP23
Parody of actual AJUMP23
Lovely. The original is timeless this one will be forgotten in time. And that is the best Disney can hope for.
I totally forgot about this but might drag the kids to see it this weekend.
Live action Lilo & Stitch seems to hew very close to the cartoon, but I suspect there are gonna be issues with it. Live action Moana is gonna be a TOUGH sell as the original feels too recent and the CG films feel almost live actiony already.
Disney needs to do a proper Black Cauldron. Though they would just f it up.
Disney needs to do a proper Black Cauldron. Though they would just f it up.
We need a Time Machine to go back and stop Katzenberg from cutting all that footage and destroying it.
ChuckeRearmed
Member
RetroGamingUK
Member
Chittagong
Gold Member
Review in The Times seems mostly mixed
Last edited:
Yes, fully expect a series based heavily on Welsh folklore to suddenly look like the UN, losing Princess Eilonwy, a redhead, for sure.
N0S
Al Pachinko, Konami President
Snow White Review - IGN
A live-action Disney remake that meaningfully adapts its original, rather than creating a lesser mimicry.www.ign.com
IGN gave it 7.
kruis
Exposing the sinister cartel of retailers who allow companies to pay for advertising space.
Madflavor
Member
Unbelievable.
You know Snow White may not be the most popular Disney Princess, but she sure as shit is the most important. It’s the film that started everything for Disney, and a timeless classic. The way they handled making this film was just wrong. Most other studios would’ve understood that now was not the time to fuck around by updating for modern audiences, or racebending the titular character. Especially with an actress who’s incredibly unlikable. This was the time to pay respect to your history and origins.
They deserve the embarrassment and financial loss. This company really used to make you believe they were putting pure magic on the screen. Now look at em.
You know Snow White may not be the most popular Disney Princess, but she sure as shit is the most important. It’s the film that started everything for Disney, and a timeless classic. The way they handled making this film was just wrong. Most other studios would’ve understood that now was not the time to fuck around by updating for modern audiences, or racebending the titular character. Especially with an actress who’s incredibly unlikable. This was the time to pay respect to your history and origins.
They deserve the embarrassment and financial loss. This company really used to make you believe they were putting pure magic on the screen. Now look at em.
GateofD
Member
Yikes, yea a redhead. She’s gone for sure.
LectureMaster
Has Man Musk
AJUMP23
Parody of actual AJUMP23
Well he won’t crash a plane.
Saber
Newd Member
Who would in their sane mind goes around shitting on a classic that put the company on the top place and defined them?
It's just like what Disney did with Acolyte.
Do you like Jedi? Too bad, they are evil now.
Do you think it's a battle between good and evil? No, theres no good and evil.
Do you think Anakin was the chosen one? Nah, he was just a man because it was a patriarchy series.
Just imagine somenone doing that with Harry Potter. Telling all the fans who loves the series they are all wrong and dated.
StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
If this was 3-4 years ago, all these modern audience stuff would be the norm. Since Floyd riots 5 years ago, just about every company (especially media and entertainment) went full DEI and BLM for years. All ;pro sports leagues turned into BLM promoters for a year or two - even NHL hockey with the 10 black guys in a league of 700 players. It's just a matter if they went back to normal by now or if they still are amped up on modern audience content. The past 12-18 months have been a slaughterhouse against it, especially with Trump winning. Nobody is afraid anymore to counter back or simply just ignore watching or paying for this stuff.
I think what happened is Snow White with Rachel Z an CGI dwarfs was already in production and everything set. So no turning back unless they wanted to scrap it all and start over. As I suspected, it totally fits the timeline.... I just checked Wiki and the cast was picked in 2021.
But for media/entertainment, its more interesting how much they do this for future projects as they now got time to adjust. Some will, some wont.
Amazingly, Top Gun Maverick is as predictable and dude bro as you can get flying planes and Tom Cruise getting the girl and made $1.5B sales and surely shitloads of DVD/BR sales. That movie was 3 years ago. If that movie cant even get movie studios to get back to less political and modern audience norms like before nothing will for some.
Last edited:
Movie also named their enemy, the enemy. which was stupid. Also movie was bad for me.
Even though it's Gal Gadot, she is a bad actress, and the reason why wonder woman worked is because her accent actually fits.
StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
Never followed Gal Gadot's career aside from WW which I thought was a good superhero movie (even though I dont like many of them and arent even a supe movie fan). I didnt see WW84.
Looking at her film resume on wiki, it looks like most of her films are either Fast Furious or Wonder Woman related. Never saw Fast movies, but looks like she's in most of them. She's no good in those movies?
Alebrije
Member
they have tons of money, they can produce 10 more fail movies and still have money for other 10 more fails.
obviosly this wont be good for shareholders.
Last edited:
GymWolf
Gold Member
She is the eye candy like in any movie that give her a role.
She is kinda of a luckier megan fox but with a more annoying accent.
Last edited:
scoobidoo112
Member
Ouch. Expecting a large second week drop and poor legs.
I think the 'dwarves' were actually some sort of motley ethnically diverse human cast first, then they went back and made them versions of the animated dwarves from the old cartoon. One of the reasons why the film was so delayed and cost so much. This flick was never about a close adaptation of the cartoon until the initial hue and cry made them pivot.
Stitch, since it has a largely non-white cast to begin with, was an easier sell to be more faithful to the original film. Moana I'm sure as well. HIGHLY doubt you will see some black, white, or arabic folk on moanas island or the green plant lady look clearly jewish, for example.
DonkeyPunchJr
World’s Biggest Weeb
Definitely sounds like a Return to Form for Disney.
Saber
Newd Member
Thats probably it, which is weird.
I mean, theres a literal dwarf in the army cast. Like, spoilers really, but theres an actual dwarf that really plays an important part at the ending. Which will probably beg the question of why not use real dwarves instead. At this point they really....really didn't want to use dwarves as main protagonists in this movie hence the movie no longer has them in the title anymore.
Last edited:
GymWolf
Gold Member
Peter dickhead was against using actual dwarfs.
Saber
Newd Member
Hence why is weird. Like I said, theres an actual dwarf in the movie and I shit you not, he actually plays an important role in the movie.
Last edited:
GateofD
Member
Using dwarfs as dwarfs is bad cause what Peter doesn’t want to be seen as dwarf actor. But he has built up his own merits. How about others that just want to be part of the project?
Why doesn’t they do what LoTR did with hobbits and use camera tricks to portray them, or would that be dwarf-face?
Why doesn’t they do what LoTR did with hobbits and use camera tricks to portray them, or would that be dwarf-face?
That forced perspective stuff is hard to do in camera and takes a lot of time for the other actors. The lazy route these days is do it all in a computer lab.
Heimdall_Xtreme
Hermen Hulst Fanclub's #1 Member
I see the actress has a phobia about grabbing a broom and helping clean the dwarves' house.
Let's send Rachel back to medieval times, where she belongs, and boycott the movie.
Let's send Rachel back to medieval times, where she belongs, and boycott the movie.
pauljeremiah
Gold Member
Just out of seeing it at the cinema.
It’s fine. I liked that they tried to expand the story to give the characters more depth, but at times, the film felt very muddled and hampered by callbacks to the original animated film. Rachel Zegler is great in this and gives it her all for the musical numbers. Gal Gadot has a great screen presence as the Evil Queen but feels more like a pantomime villain when performing her big solo number.
2.5/5
It’s fine. I liked that they tried to expand the story to give the characters more depth, but at times, the film felt very muddled and hampered by callbacks to the original animated film. Rachel Zegler is great in this and gives it her all for the musical numbers. Gal Gadot has a great screen presence as the Evil Queen but feels more like a pantomime villain when performing her big solo number.
2.5/5
AJUMP23
Parody of actual AJUMP23
Drive your kids home safely.
Angry_Megalodon
Member
Critics aren't only saying it's bad, they are addressing the real issue: desecration. That's the word.
Disney exposed as the evil cunts they are.
Disney exposed as the evil cunts they are.
StreetsofBeige
Gold Member
Down to 44% after 172 critics on RT. This morning it was 47% after 100. So looks like even among critics it's trending down moreso.
AJUMP23
Parody of actual AJUMP23
Lucas called them the evil empire and white slavers.
DeafTourette
Perpetually Offended
I've changed my mind. Not even watching on streaming unless there's nothing else to watch