jm89
Member
B-b-but it’s all about engagement now. Sales mean nothing anymore!!:
"Xbox has left playstation"
Like xbox had a choice in the matter.
B-b-but it’s all about engagement now. Sales mean nothing anymore!!:
What "energy" am I using? I already mentioned I hate the relationship that has formed between fans and Big corporations since social media. This thread could of just as easily been about any games sales record.Of course SM2 broke records. It was always going too.For months LOL, the so-called "graphics whore" not using the same energy on the very recent "built-from-the-ground-up" Forza and "next-gen exclusive" Starfield, wonder why?
Well, "bugs are part of the [studio] games' charm."What about this stat. Spider-Man 2 did lead in the coveted "most bugs in a Sony first party release" metric
Spider-Man 2 being the fastest selling game published by Sony Interactive Entertainment is in no way irrelevant.Why the fuck does every irrelevent "promotional" twitter post require its own thread?
Like who gives a shit if a billion dollar company is doing well or if a billion dollar IP is selling well? Why should the average gamer give a fuck? Im not a goddamm shareholder?
If it's been posted already, my bad
You must have missed the 24hrs part. And also the part where its predecessor took 3 days to even break that milestone.
Then again who are we kidding, even if it sold 10Min 24hrs I am sure you would have figured out some negative way to spin it.
Is the percentage to the userbase a new metric to make all games that aren't Mario or Zelda look bad on sales?Anyone who didn't buy it on day one is a casual to me. Wtf are you missing? I always complain about sales when it's a huge game and it's selling to 5% of the userbase. It's odd to me that more aren't buying the biggest game in a long time. I bought it and it's awesome. Where are you getting spin from me? Sensitive fanboys, I swear.
Is the percentage to the userbase a new metric to make all games that aren't Mario or Zelda look bad on sales?
I'm not really talking about your opinion or anything else, just haven't really seen anyone else talk about sales in percentage to the userbase which is quite odd as far as metrics go.I'm not trying to make it look bad, I said "it goes to show how most sales come from casuals." Like I said twice now. It's going to sell an insane amount in the end but most sales are coming much later than I would expect from an anticipated game. Why are people getting so salty about my opinion about who buys games? Lol
If it's been posted already, my bad
If it's been posted already, my bad
I'm not really talking about your opinion or anything else, just haven't really seen anyone else talk about sales in percentage to the userbase which is quite odd as far as metrics go.
everyone knows that any game that doesn't sell like GTA5 is a failureHow one can spin 2.5m sold in 24 hours (no matter the userbase) into any kind of negative is not only comedy inducing, but completely out of touch with how this stuff works. There are bad takes and then there is that.
Here’s an example:I love how they always hold PlayStation to high standards, while ignoring the quality (or lack thereof) of the games that their favorite brand has released so far.
I don't even think it's about just "casuals". Unlike Nintendo where most of the userbase will buy into the platform for Mario/Zelda/Pokemon, most users on a console have very varied tastes. Sure, there's the usual Fifa/COD crowd but there are also many "hardcore" people that are into their own niche games and don't just play whatever Sony releases. Which is why it makes it a strange metric to use, unless we're trying to talk about gamer's varied tastes, the only other reason to use it is to try and downplay sales. Not saying this is what you specifically tried to do, just saying, I also don't have a horse in this race and I'm mostly an observer.I don't think it's odd to use that metric. I think it's odd that a large percentage of users of a console don't buy the console's biggest games. But I also can't understand casual gamers since I'm not one.
Seems that it's similar to the percentage of casuals, who don't visit gaming forums, vs. us more hardcore gamers. They outnumber us by A LOT.
People buy the games they want when they can afford too. Not everyone is going to run out and buy a game day one.I don't think it's odd to use that metric. I think it's odd that a large percentage of users of a console don't buy the console's biggest games. But I also can't understand casual gamers since I'm not one.
Seems that it's similar to the percentage of casuals, who don't visit gaming forums, vs. us more hardcore gamers. They outnumber us by A LOT.
I don't even think it's about just "casuals". Unlike Nintendo where most of the userbase will buy into the platform for Mario/Zelda/Pokemon, most users on a console have very varied tastes. Sure, there's the usual Fifa/COD crowd but there are also many "hardcore" people that are into their own niche games and don't just play whatever Sony releases. Which is why it makes it a strange metric to use, unless we're trying to talk about gamer's varied tastes, the only other reason to use it is to try and downplay sales. Not saying this is what you specifically tried to do, just saying, I also don't have a horse in this race and I'm mostly an observer.
its extremely stupid metric,I don't think it's odd to use that metric. I think it's odd that a large percentage of users of a console don't buy the console's biggest games. But I also can't understand casual gamers since I'm not one.
Seems that it's similar to the percentage of casuals, who don't visit gaming forums, vs. us more hardcore gamers. They outnumber us by A LOT.
Last belda hit ~8% of userbase on its first week, SM2 might actually surpass it.Is the percentage to the userbase a new metric to make all games that aren't Mario or Zelda look bad on sales?
its extremely stupid metric,
only a braindead 50 yo console warrior would use as a sad spin.
by same logic totk could only reach %7 of switch players with 10 mil 3 day sales.
but these are the same morons, who is trying to equate dloads to to full price sales, what can you expect?
If it's been posted already, my bad
The purpose was to give the trolls something to repeat it was a dog whistle & as you can see the dogs are out lolWhat is this guy on about? What was the purpose of the 6% nonsense? 2.5 million in 24hrs is phenomenal
Yeah but he actually comes off very badly, you simply can't downplay that amount of sales regardless of how you put it.The purpose was to give the trolls something to repeat it was a dog whistle & as you can see the dogs are out lol
Spider-Man 2 fastest selling 1st party PlayStation game in history. Should be approaching 5m already then.
So Ragnarok sold less than 2.5m in 24 hours, but over 5.1m in 5 days. Interesting. That gives some insight into launch day vs the days that follow in terms of sales distribution in games. Would have thought launch day would have been over 50% of first week sales honestly but it seems not.
Why the fuck does every irrelevent "promotional" twitter post require its own thread?
Like who gives a shit if a billion dollar company is doing well or if a billion dollar IP is selling well? Why should the average gamer give a fuck? Im not a goddamm shareholder?
B-b-but it’s all about engagement now. Sales mean nothing anymore!!:
If it's been posted already, my bad
well, if console warring actually required a certain amount of intelligence, your confusion would be more understandable. but, as things are,...Yeah but he actually comes off very badly, you simply can't downplay that amount of sales regardless of how you put it.
plus some of us just like analyzing statistics and data,Because sells matter to the games that gamers get to play. But you already knew that. Now you just mad.
The truth doesn't really matter to trollsYeah but he actually comes off very badly, you simply can't downplay that amount of sales regardless of how you put it.
Here’s an example:
This is incredibly weird post. People have different tastes, play different genres, have all kinds of obligations, want to wait for bugs to get fixed (and Spider-man 2 has some that aren't just in the title). What the heck does any of that have to do with being "casual"?The game will sell 5x this number in a month, more or less. Those non day 1 buyers are kind of casual to me. That's all I'm saying. Are the people who buy it a month from now not fans of the genre? Doubt it. They are just more casual. But yes, it could also be money situation. Kids pestering their parents for the game or having to wait until their birthday.
Yep, that's why sales threads exist, its fun to look at various sales data around the world.plus some of us just like analyzing statistics and data,
Ive already explained more than once why I made the post if you want to know you can read my post history instead of implying I give a shit about console wars or that Im emotionaly invested in whether sm does well or not. I couldnt care less either way. If you read my orginal post about why I posted that you would see the irony in any console warrior accusations Im recieving.Because sells matter to the games that gamers get to play. But you already knew that. Now you just mad.
Well it may be not be due to warring but it was very short sighted. You really don't understand why gamers are happy when games do well and further you don't see why this is good for gamers?Ive already explained more than once why I made the post if you want to know you can read my post history instead of implying I give a shit about console wars or that Im emotionaly invested in whether sm does well or not. I couldnt care less either way. If you read my orginal post about why I posted that you would see the irony in any console warrior accusations Im recieving.