You got killed by CROX too eh? It's gonna take awhile to get back up. I am not buying anymore CROX no matter how low it goes. It's too unpredictable, and no one really knows where they're going yet. The shoes are already there, they have a clothing line and those trendy trinkets. Yet to see where all this is going. I could have taken profit, but I didn't... I'm waiting to see how these new lines go.Maxwell House said:Yeah, luckily I have funds available. I plan to buy quite a bit tomorrow (including more Crox on any further pullback).
I have confidence in Crox, and think today's drop was overreaction.
Right, but Crox has expanded overseas and they couldn't get their manufacturing to match demand over there. Once they get the manufacturing up to speed, they should be back to posting estimate beating earnings again in a quarter or two.Ether_Snake said:Investing in fashion, isn't that REALLY risky? I know some fashion companies here in Montreal create whole new brands every few years because brands eventually go out of style after around three years. So you see all these different labels over the years but it's all the same company really.
Does anyone really still buy Tommy Hilfiger?
CROX sucks.me said:I work in fashion, so it's easy for me to keep track of the entire industry. CROCS are affordable, functional in the real world. Maybe a bit more than a trend, but time will tell.
I think they have a niche that sets them apart from other brands which are really just "names". I don't doubt people are going to snatch it up. It was overrated, but now it's a discount.
People have to wear clothes, right?
Marvel Entertainment Inc (NYSE:MVL - News), which licenses comic-book characters, posted a better-than-expected quarterly profit, helped by Spider-Man 3 merchandise licensing, and raised its 2007 outlook, sending shares up almost 22 percent.
Video-games publisher Activision (ATVI - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating) blew past analysts' expectations for the second quarter, thanks to sales of its hit titles, Guitar Hero Encore, and Transformers.
The company also guided results higher for the third quarter and full fiscal year.
Maxwell House said:I am getting an itchy finger when it comes to my STP holdings. It has run up like CRAZY the last 3 months. Maybe I should profit take before the Chinese bubble bursts.
Fuzzery said:Oh wow (haven't checked stocks in awhile, been busyyy irl) WTF happened lolll
nakedsushi said:I'm trying to decide if now is a good time to buy NTDOY or if I can risk seeing it go lower. I'd love to buy it for less than 70.
nakedsushi said:Man, I hope this doesn't bite me in the butt later.
I was staring at the CROX ticker earlier this morning and noticed it was slowing going up from 33 to 34. I thought, "Well, if it goes to 35, I'll buy." So I bought at 35. It closed at 37. Maybe it's finally stopped dropping?
CROX taught me some hard lessons. Me and my rookie "trust & hold" strategy. I should have left well enough alone... what did I think it was going to 100? Silly me. Now it's so red, I have no choice but to hold it. It can only go up from here.gkrykewy said:Holy fuck at CROX. Hope no one owns that - Jesus.
Businesswire said:Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP ("Coughlin Stoia") (http://www.csgrr.com/cases/crocs/) today announced that a class action has been commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado on behalf of purchasers of CROCS Inc. ("CROCS" or the "Company") (NASDAQ:CROX) securities during the period between July 27, 2007 and October 31, 2007 (the "Class Period").
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than 60 days from today. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact plaintiff's counsel, Samuel H. Rudman or David A. Rosenfeld of Coughlin Stoia at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058, or via e-mail at [email protected]. If you are a member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint as filed or join this class action online at http://www.csgrr.com/cases/crocs/. Any member of the purported class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.
The complaint charges CROCS and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. CROCS and its subsidiaries design, develop and manufacture consumer products from specialty resins worldwide. The Company offers footwear for men, women and children under the "CROCS" brand.
According to the complaint, during the Class Period, Defendants issued materially false and misleading statements that misrepresented and failed to disclose: (i) that the Company was experiencing significant distribution problems in Europe as it had moved distribution facilities and was experiencing distribution problems in Japan with a third-party distributor, causing the Company to lose tens of millions of dollars in sales; (ii) that the Company's sales were being negatively impacted by seasonal conditions as consumers reduced purchases of the Company's products in cold weather climates; (iii) that the Company's inventory levels were building far beyond historic levels as sales began to slow and the Company's sales began to be impacted by seasonality; and (iv) based on the foregoing, Defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about the Company, its earnings and prospects.
On October 31, 2007, CROCS issued a press release announcing its financial results for the third quarter of 2007, the period ending September 30, 2007. Following the earnings announcements, CROCS held a conference call for analysts and investors. During the call, Defendants discussed problems at its European and Japanese distribution centers and its growing inventory, among other things. In response to these announcements, the price of CROCS stock declined from $74.75 per share to $47.74 per share on extremely heavy trading volume.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of CROCS securities during the Class Period (the "Class"). The plaintiff is represented by Coughlin Stoia, which has expertise in prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud.
Coughlin Stoia, a 180-lawyer firm with offices in San Diego, San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York, Boca Raton, Washington, D.C., Houston and Philadelphia, is active in major litigations pending in federal and state courts throughout the United States and has taken a leading role in many important actions on behalf of defrauded investors, consumers, and companies, as well as victims of human rights violations. Coughlin Stoia lawyers have been responsible for more than $45 billion in aggregate recoveries. The Coughlin Stoia Web site (http://www.csgrr.com) has more information about the firm.
SOURCE: Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP
Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, New York
Samuel H. Rudman, 800-449-4900
David A. Rosenfeld
[email protected]
"It's hard to have confidence in the earnings outlook for exporters for the next six months,'' said Naoki Fujiwara, who helps oversee $3.2 billion at Shinkin Asset Management Co. in Tokyo.
guess said:NTDOY = bomb
I'm glad I bailed out.
Cheesemeister said:Bid: 66.58 x200 Ask: 66.60 x200
Buying opportunity ahoy!
guess said:Yep, I bailed out, but I will be getting back in. Should I feel bad for hoping it keeps dropping?
Cheesemeister said:Bid: 66.58 x200 Ask: 66.60 x200
Buying opportunity ahoy!
lil smoke said:I think I'm going to join the class against CROX. What do I have to lose? Has anyone ever been involved in something like this? Will I have to appear?
kathode said:I've been involved in a couple. Generally you fill out the paperwork, forget about it, hear nothing for years, and if you're lucky, eventually you'll get a check for something like $30. Settlements are usually doled out per-share and the amount is generally too small to be that meaningful to the average investor. Class action lawsuits get lawyers rich, that's about it.
oh, so it's not worth it, but for principle. They basically F'd with my $. I hadn't invested too much in it, but it did hurt a bit. I think I'll sign on just to help send the message.kathode said:I've been involved in a couple. Generally you fill out the paperwork, forget about it, hear nothing for years, and if you're lucky, eventually you'll get a check for something like $30. Settlements are usually doled out per-share and the amount is generally too small to be that meaningful to the average investor. Class action lawsuits get lawyers rich, that's about it.
lil smoke said:I wonder what this'll do to the perception of CROX? Is it all over?