SweetTooth
Gold Member
Its happening now except they burned $70B to delay it 3 years
[Activision] has been disappointing,” said Denny Fish, a Janus Henderson Investors portfolio manager who oversees two funds that included a total of more than $800 million in Microsoft stock as of November.
""I just think the majority of the game market doesn't really want a game pass" like the one Microsoft is offering, said Gus Zinn, a portfolio manager of the Macquarie Science and Technology Fund"
Those numbers for "Cloud First Gamers" seem utterly ludicrous. This graph indicates that Microsoft is expecting more growth among them than of PC first gamers. We're still seeing significant issues in most of the world streaming games that are from multiple generations ago in 2025. But by 2030 tons of people will be streaming the latest games to their smart TVs, streaming stick apps, low end PCs, and limited mobile devices.The goal was based on PC and cloud growth. This is the chart of their projections
And it only took 2700% spending and operating costs.
The ABK acquisition was a huge mistake. Huge.
I wonder if someone at PlayStation immediately realized it and was laughing under their breath the whole time...
Is there really a market of 100 million players worldwide willing to pay around $100 annually? Even the most famous F2P game, Fortnite, has only reached a maximum of 13 million concurrent users. The casual audience wouldn’t spend this much money anyway. The number of Steam and console users is already known. This is just a foolish dream.100 million subscribers is basically monopolizing the current console gaming market, how very Microsoft of them.
I asked Copilot to write me a song and I made an edit or two... (all in fun Xbox bros.)
The graph to me seems completely arbitrary. They even added random dips and trajectory changes. It appears completely handwavy at best.Those numbers for "Cloud First Gamers" seem utterly ludicrous. This graph indicates that Microsoft is expecting more growth among them than of PC first gamers. We're still seeing significant issues in most of the world streaming games that are from multiple generations ago in 2025. But by 2030 tons of people will be streaming the latest games to their smart TVs, streaming stick apps, low end PCs, and limited mobile devices.
What is more funny that among the big gaming cloud services xCloud is arguably the worst quality-wise. It's like they are living in some kind of delusion making these projections.Those numbers for "Cloud First Gamers" seem utterly ludicrous. This graph indicates that Microsoft is expecting more growth among them than of PC first gamers. We're still seeing significant issues in most of the world streaming games that are from multiple generations ago in 2025. But by 2030 tons of people will be streaming the latest games to their smart TVs, streaming stick apps, low end PCs, and limited mobile devices.
In my opinion, the acquisition of ABK has forced Microsoft to publish its games on all platforms.Come on let’s hear from the financial experts on Neogaf on how purchasing one of the greatest revenues in gaming was a huge mistake…
Please do not start with it needs to recoup $80billion… otherwise go back to middle school finance before continuing.
Meanwhile, Sony gives absolutely nothing and are rewarded with increasing market share, go figure.
Xbox hasn’t been real competition in sometime. Besides, as we always have to point out to doom/gloom posts like this, Nintendo and Steam very much are competition to PlayStation. The best three will remain.No one should want this. Sony needs some kind of competition.
That being said, companies constantly review every part of their business.
20 million units this year? Lol.Some people on reddit are very optimistic
4 out of 5 biggest games of 2024 could only be played on the PlayStation console.Meanwhile, Sony gives absolutely nothing and are rewarded with increasing market share, go figure.
He doesn’t either. It’s just that chickens have very little to do in life. Either grift or become4 out of 5 biggest games of 2024 could only be played on the PlayStation console.
Nobody buys this narrative of "Sony being as bad as Xbox."
$20 per month (for the tier that has day-one first-party games).100 million subs seems to be a pretty high percentage of console gamers. And a lofty goal. How much is gamepass these days, $14 or so? That's a lot of income to walk away from just because it's under the stated goal.
$20 per month (for the tier that has day-one first-party games).
And that's a lot of revenue to walk away from. If the operating expenses are higher than the operating revenue, and Game Pass is making a net annual loss, earnings per share would increase if Microsoft decided to shut down Game Pass / Xbox business.
There are people still buying. Mostly normies who like to game and don't follow the news.
At least they had a proper vision on gaming back then. Hipster or not, he just sat down and explained it during an E3 conference.
It was about online gaming, friends, first-party titles and achievements. Regardless of what you think about these points, at least they had points instead of whatever they're doing now. The thing that comes closest to Microsoft's current public vision on Xbox was that weird round-table on YouTube early last year they did after a total shit storm.
I've said it multiple times but I still believe they cannot just kill the entire thing off, as Nadella says it needs to wind down. You can't just plain shut it down without severe backlash from gamers, consumer organizations and governments. They'll be torn several extra assholes by all of them if they don't refund like Google did with Stadia, or at the very least give a year (or 2 in the EU) notice.
The hardware situation is pretty crazy. There's so little stock, no deals over black friday. No deals at all.
They've either given up this generation and are all hands on dick for next gen or they are literally giving up on console hardware but are trying to not tell anyone.
It's Sunsetting in IT-Slop dialect of EnglishThey've all but discontinued their physical models, they're barely making hardware in general, and they're not pushing for any serious exclusive 3rd party deals.
$20 per month (for the tier that has day-one first-party games).
They had to make some ridiculous goal like that to get greater Microsoft to approve spending 70 billion on Activision. At this point even the ceo is tied to trying to make Xbox work because shareholders would call for his head if they decided to get out of gaming after that sale.Is there really a market of 100 million players worldwide willing to pay around $100 annually? Even the most famous F2P game, Fortnite, has only reached a maximum of 13 million concurrent users. The casual audience wouldn’t spend this much money anyway. The number of Steam and console users is already known. This is just a foolish dream.
PC GP is $11.99 and gets all the first party games 1.
For now. But their main GP audience is on console. PC GP experience is a horror show or a comedy of errors, depends on the game. The amount of growth from PC is very-very low.PC GP is $11.99 and gets all the first party games 1.
Ambitious targets.
100 million subs seems to be a pretty high percentage of console gamers. And a lofty goal. How much is gamepass these days, $14 or so? That's a lot of income to walk away from just because it's under the stated goal.
It's incredible how the entire Xbox strategy has collapsed, nothing has gone well for them, not hardware sales, not the increase in GP subscriptions, not software sales, etc... and all this after a huge investment.
Yep that sales baseline has to be beyond awful at this point. I simply don't see a way back for them, even if they make 10 1P AAA exclusives of top quality in one year, it's simply too much of an uphill battle rn, those acquisitions should have happened during the One gen so they can hit the ground running with strong exclusives this gen.This is true, but they did just have presumably their worst CY Q3 ever, which indicates that casual gamers are abandoning them too.
They're phasing out physical gaming as they pivot to an all digital future across Hybrid PC.
Phil Spencer himself asking the tough questions lol.It's a valid question considering you're using that as a retort but yet you're not taking advantage of it.
So what's in it for you in this case?
It's a valid question considering you're using that as a retort but yet you're not taking advantage of it.
So what's in it for you in this case?
Yep that sales baseline has to be beyond awful at this point. I simply don't see a way back for them, even if they make 10 1P AAA exclusives of top quality in one year, it's simply too much of an uphill battle rn, those acquisitions should have happened during the One gen so they can hit the ground running with strong exclusives this gen.
One thing I want to say is that the mass-porting is a reaction to the HW sales decline (which incidentally started really showing in the Starfield launch quarter lol), not a reason for it happening.
I'm seeing some Xbox podcasters trying to make the business case for keeping exclusives, and it's entirely nonsensical.
I think retailers almost definitely won't want to take on massive stocks like they did this gen. They're already doing things like outsourcing part servicing to iFixit like Valve does.I think the next gen Xbox(es) could be direct to consumer only.
Yep.I think the HW sales decline happened well before Starfield. Starfield was meant to right the ship and yet when it released there was no change at all.
Yep, I think the brand is largely getting rejected en masse at this point. Suck for those who love it, but the facts on the ground speak volumes imo.People simply aren't buying Xbox for any specific game Microsoft puts out and their studios don't have the pedigree to pump out 10 top quality AAA exclusives. They really haven't done that in the 20 years they've been on the market. What success have they had outside of Bungie and Epic Games?
I think so too, but I think launching with Deathloop and Ghostwire as exclusives for Xbox rather than timed ones for Sony could have made a difference and kept consumer good will going. COD exclusivity being discussed in the build-up to the current gen launch rather than 2 years afterwards might have made a difference and gotten some COD diehards to pick Xbox instead.Even had they made the same acquisitions 5 years earlier, it wouldn't have made a difference. They acquired the wrong companies. They should have acquired companies like CDPR or Larian. Witcher and Cyberpunk being exclusives would have gone a longer way. Bethesda's best games take way too long to make and their talent profile is seriously going downhill. ABK was also going downhill before the purchase.
Correcting misinformation is not 'retort'. Wish you'd have done the same instead of this lame 'gotcha', G.
That's all that's in it for me at the moment.