Barely above PS2 graphics, running the same calendar system gameplay across 20+ years, uneven pacing, load screens everywhere, everything feels fully scripted through every moment you play through, with only the disguise of choices, zero dynamic elements in the games (even as basic as day night, weather), 90% of dialogue having no voice actingWhat flaws do you mean in particular? They are darlings of the industry for the past decade and more so I'm curious about what you mean. How are they behind the curve?
Well I'm an avid enjoyer of Atlus games. Your criticism are valid up till you realize their budgets are a fraction of what a normal AAA game from a western developer would cost like. Also their games are all heavily stylized, they go for kind off a timeless anime look instead of realistic 3D rendering.Barely above PS2 graphics, running the same calendar system gameplay across 20+ years, uneven pacing, load screens everywhere, everything feels fully scripted through every moment you play through, with only the disguise of choices, zero dynamic elements in the games (even as basic as day night, weather), 90% of dialogue having no voice acting
Game Freak gets torn to shreds for their unchanging formula and dated graphics but nobody says a thing about Atlus
And no I'm not saying they are bad games, they just don't get critiqued the way other games do
I've always been saying that BoTW as basically MGS5: TPP but Nintendo/Anime.Breath of the Wild would have got a 6/10 if it didn’t have Zelda in the title.
Well I'm an avid enjoyer of Atlus games. Your criticism are valid up till you realize their budgets are a fraction of what a normal AAA game from a western developer would cost like. Also their games are all heavily stylized, they go for kind off a timeless anime look instead of realistic 3D rendering.
I agree that pretty all games in each IP they own are very iterative, but hey most people aren't complaining so...
Good hot take I suppose
Lol just no. Why is this even a take here? If you don't like it then you can simple disable vibration on your controller and go on your merry way.
On the other hand I can factually say that playing without rumble worsens the gaming experience for millions of console players across the global. It has become an integral feature for decades now; thus not a gimmick.
Evidence: There are more and more mouses coming out nowadays that now emulate rumble features similar to the ones in controllers.
I would say you have a bad take but I could never speak ill against the Ambassador of Centauri <3I just wish videogames had never become mainstream
dude, same here, I even played some of the other fry cry games, but blood dragon was the most funFar Cry Blood Dragon is the best Ubisoft game and the only one I like from that company.
I'm seeing more and more people are getting soured on the open world Zelda games. 3 years ago if someone said stuff like this they would've had to go into protective custody. Also maybe I'm a bit aloof but it seems like to me that Tears of the kingdom came out without much fanfare? I know as a Nintendo 1st party game its obviously successful but I'm wondering if Nintendo is sensing fan fatigue for this formula?The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild and The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom are rubbish. They are not even good video games, let alone the masterpieces of the Zelda franchise that the fanboys make them out to be. Nintendo shat out gameplay mechanics that other games had done a decade before but Nintendo fanboys wouldn't know that because they've been stuck playing boring Mario and Kirby spinoffs. Cooking, tablet telekinesis, climbing stamina, are all derivative nonsense and gimmicks shoehorned in to "innovate" when really Zelda should have been left as is. Ocarina of Time and Link to the Past are still the pinnacle of Zelda, and future Zelda games should emulate them in their tone, design, gameplay, and atmosphere. Zelda is dead to me until Nintendo does that.
For me BotW and TotK are good games, they don't have any replay value. I finish them, will probably never play them again from the Beginning.I'm seeing more and more people are getting soured on the open world Zelda games. 3 years ago if someone said stuff like this they would've had to go into protective custody. Also maybe I'm a bit aloof but it seems like to me that Tears of the kingdom came out without much fanfare? I know as a Nintendo 1st party game its obviously successful but I'm wondering if Nintendo is sensing fan fatigue for this formula?
VR is vastly more innovative and fun than regular gaming this gen.
I read VR porn is a game changer but I'm too scared to verify that lest I lose my flimsy anchor to reality.What are some of your favorites?
The two REs; Villiage and 4 remake, Red Matter 2, No Man’s Sky, Gran Turismo 7, Hubris, Metro.What are some of your favorites?
That reminds me.After the end credits are over he goes over sorts Peaches pipes out.
Like rock'n'roll it has become just a product to consume, and the magic will never come back.
FTFY?Rockstar games are disgustingly over rated.
There's still no market for them and it's ruining game devs for wasting money on games no one wants to play.1. "Woke" is actually good for gaming. All I see it as is an opportunity for new stories and perspectives to be told, where there previously wasn't a market for them.
People keep on complaining that gaming has gone stale. If that's the case, why get into an uproar when developers are trying to do something new?
The fact that they exist means there is space and a market for them. Developers should make the games and stories they feel passionate about, this will lead to the best end product.There's still no market for them and it's ruining game devs for wasting money on games no one wants to play.
Don't know if hot take really but Sonic is just straight up trash.
You know what. I'll grant you that there is a niche fringe population that would celebrate 'Woke' games. The term is diluted and very loaded but here is what I think of when I hear of a game being 'Woke' and what I would find in it:The fact that they exist means there is space and a market for them. Developers should make the games and stories they feel passionate about, this will lead to the best end product.
Is that a hot take? RDR2 is 100% carried by it's atmosphere and world. It's gameplay is actually kind of shit, just like GTA. If 1 had 2's graphics it wouldn't be a contest.Red Dead Redemption 1 is leagues better than 2 because of 0 invisible walls during the missions, walk-only restrictions (not even light run), also because Arthur controls like a sack of potatoes, and because RDR2’s landscape despite being obviously better-looking it felt like GTA in the prairie/mountains rather than a classic spaghetti western which the aesthetic of RDR1 allowed it to. Also RDR 2 people think the song moment was unique and “so wow” but it was literally copied from 1 when you go to Mexico for the first time.
The fact that they exist just means there are developers who want to make a market, it doesn’t mean there is one. It’s also why they try and link this shit to popular IPs because it would have no chance of making money without it.The fact that they exist means there is space and a market for them. Developers should make the games and stories they feel passionate about, this will lead to the best end product.
Nooo bro there are many coop games where teamwork is paramount in multiplayer, games like GTFO, phasmophobia, Destiny Raids etc. They wouldn't work in a couch coop setting but they are amazing.There is nothing fun in online multi-player games. Either couch co-op, or solo game.
Fallout 4 dumps all over New Vegas in nearly every way.
Fallout 4 dumps all over New Vegas in nearly every way.
Both of you showed up and chose violence xDExtremely underrated game I loved it. NV was supposedly better than F3 but no it wasn't at all.
This is basically the feeling I had while playing through Dragon Quest III HD-2D Remake. On one hand, it's pretty cool what they did with it. On the other hand, I wish they'd done more.HD-2D is both charming and disappointing.
I'm seeing more and more people are getting soured on the open world Zelda games. 3 years ago if someone said stuff like this they would've had to go into protective custody. Also maybe I'm a bit aloof but it seems like to me that Tears of the kingdom came out without much fanfare? I know as a Nintendo 1st party game its obviously successful but I'm wondering if Nintendo is sensing fan fatigue for this formula?
You know what. I'll grant you that there is a niche fringe population that would celebrate 'Woke' games. The term is diluted and very loaded but here is what I think of when I hear of a game being 'Woke' and what I would find in it:
Hyperfixates on everyone's sexuality, refusal to take mature personal responsibility for own actions, being entitled and hate being productive, thinking that bad manners are a virtue, general sarcastic nihilism and lack of earnestness, very solipsistic morality, pervasive disdain for males.
Don't know about you but most people would find that repulsive.
HD-2D is a nice evolution of old 2D games, but deep down, at least when it comes to remakes of 2D old school JRPGs, I kinda expect graphics at least on the level of BotW, Genshin Impact, or Visions of Mana, even if it means reimagining the whole thing.This is basically the feeling I had while playing through Dragon Quest III HD-2D Remake. On one hand, it's pretty cool what they did with it. On the other hand, I wish they'd done more.